Profiles Home

Directories  

Statewide Reports  

State Profile  

Profiles Help

 

 

Massachusetts School and District Profiles Lunenburg Primary School Lunenburg Primary School (01620010) Elaine E Blaisdell, Principal Mailing Address: 1401 Massachusetts Avenue Lunenburg, MA 01462 Phone: (978) 582­4122 FAX: (978) 582­4173 Website: http://www.lunenburgschools.net This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.

Enrollment and Educator Data (2015­16 School Year) About the Data

Enrollment (2015­16)   Total Count

Educator Data (2015­16) School

District

State

  Total # of Teachers

503

1,567

953,429

African American or Black

0.8

1.6

8.8

Asian

1.4

1.5

6.5

Hispanic or Latino

7.0

5.9

18.6

Multi­race, Non­Hispanic

3.8

1.9

3.2

Native American

0.2

0.4

0.2

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

0.4

0.4

0.1

86.5

88.3

62.7

Male

51.3

51.9

51.2

Female

48.7

48.1

48.8

Race/Ethnicity (%)

White

Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified

Gender (%)

Student/Teacher Ratio Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers

Selected Populations (%) English Language Learner

2.6

1.5

9.0

Economically Disadvantaged

18.7

14.7

27.4

Students w/Disabilities

20.9

18.8

17.2

3.2

2.6

19.0

First Language Not English

Grades Offered: PK, K, 01, 02

 

School District 27.8 100.0 164

State

104.7 72,384.1 100.0

97.4

579 348,472

100.0

100.0

96.3

0.0

0.0

3.7

18.1 to 1 15.0 to 1 13.2 to 1 ­

0.0

0.9

2016 MCAS Results by Subgroup by Grade and Subject NOTE: First­year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first­year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first­year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.

More about the data Data Last Updated on September 26, 2016

GRADE LEVEL 3 ­ READING

Student Group Subgroups Students w/disabilities ELL and Former ELL Econ. Disadvantaged High needs Afr. Amer./Black Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. Asian Hispanic/Latino Multi­race, Non­Hisp./Lat. Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. White Male Female ELL Ever ELL   All Students 2016 2015

School District State Stud. Part. % at Each CPI SGP Incl. in Stud. Part. % at Each CPI SGP Incl. in Stud. Part. % at CPI SGP Incl. Incl Rate Level SGP (#) Incl Rate Level SGP Incl Rate Each in (#) Level SGP (#) # % A P NI W # % A P NI W # % A P NI W 23 100 4 17 43 35 57.6 3 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 21 100 10 24 48 19 67.9 39 100 8 23 44 26 64.7 2 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 1 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 8 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 2 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 99 100 5 54 33 8 83.1 54 100 4 50 37 9 80.6 58 100 7 50 33 10 82.3 1 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 3 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

N/A ­ N/A N/A ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ N/A N/A N/A ­ ­

N/A  ­  N/A  N/A  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  N/A  N/A  N/A  ­  ­ 

26 100 4 15 46 35 55.8 4 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 23 100 9 26 48 17 69.6 45 100 7 24 44 24 65.0 2 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 1 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 11 100 9 36 27 27 70.5 3 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 103 100 5 52 35 8 82.3 58 100 3 48 38 10 78.9 62 100 8 48 34 10 82.3 2 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 4 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

N/A ­ N/A N/A ­ ­ ­ N/A ­ ­ N/A N/A N/A ­ ­

112 100 5 50 35 10 81.5 N/A 125 100 10 50 34 6 85.0 N/A

N/A  N/A 

120 100 6 48 36 10 80.6 N/A 131 100 10 49 35 6 84.2 N/A

N/A  ­  N/A  N/A  ­  ­  ­  N/A  ­  ­  N/A  N/A  N/A  ­  ­ 

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­ 

N/A  ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­  N/A  24,217 100 11 49 32 9 83.4 N/A N/A 

   

GRADE LEVEL 3 ­ MATHEMATICS

Student Group Subgroups Students w/disabilities ELL and Former ELL Econ. Disadvantaged High needs Afr. Amer./Black Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. Asian Hispanic/Latino Multi­race, Non­Hisp./Lat. Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. White Male Female ELL Ever ELL   All Students 2016 2015

School District State Stud. Part. % at Each CPI SGP Incl. in Stud. Part. % at Each CPI SGP Incl. in Stud. Part. % at Each CPI SGP Incl. Incl Rate Level SGP Incl Rate Level SGP Incl Rate Level in (#) (#) SGP # % A P NI W # % A P NI W # % A P NI W (#) 23 100 13 30 35 22 70.7 3 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 21 100 19 48 24 10 83.3 39 100 18 38 28 15 78.2 2 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 1 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 8 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 2 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 98 99 43 35 16 6 89.5 54 100 41 37 11 11 88.0 57 98 37 35 25 4 88.6 1 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 3 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

N/A ­ N/A N/A ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ N/A N/A N/A ­ ­

N/A  ­  N/A  N/A  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  N/A  N/A  N/A  ­  ­ 

26 100 12 31 35 23 69.2 4 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 23 100 17 43 30 9 81.5 45 100 16 38 31 16 76.7 2 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 1 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 11 100 9 45 18 27 75.0 3 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 102 99 41 34 19 6 88.7 58 100 38 38 12 12 87.1 61 98 36 33 28 3 87.3 2 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 4 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

N/A ­ N/A N/A ­ ­ ­ N/A ­ ­ N/A N/A N/A ­ ­

111 99 39 36 18 7 88.3 N/A 124 99 21 45 20 14 81.3 N/A

N/A  N/A 

119 99 37 35 20 8 87.2 N/A 130 99 20 45 19 16 79.8 N/A

N/A  ­  N/A  N/A  ­  ­  ­  N/A  ­  ­  N/A  N/A  N/A  ­  ­ 

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­ 

N/A  ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­  N/A  24,152 100 32 39 18 11 85.4 N/A N/A 

   

ALL GRADES ­ ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

Student Group Subgroups Students w/disabilities ELL and Former ELL Econ. Disadvantaged High needs Afr. Amer./Black Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. Asian Hispanic/Latino Multi­race, Non­Hisp./Lat. Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. White Male Female ELL Ever ELL   All Students 2016 2015

School District Stud. Part. % at Each CPI SGP Incl. in Stud. Part. % at Each CPI SGP Incl. in Stud. Incl Rate Level SGP Incl Rate Level SGP Incl (#) (#) # % A P NI W # % A P NI W # 23 100 4 17 43 35 57.6 3 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 21 100 10 24 48 19 67.9 39 100 8 23 44 26 64.7 2 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 1 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 8 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 2 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 99 100 5 54 33 8 83.1 54 100 4 50 37 9 80.6 58 100 7 50 33 10 82.3 1 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 3 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

N/A ­ N/A N/A ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ N/A N/A N/A ­ ­

N/A  ­  N/A  N/A  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  N/A  N/A  N/A  ­  ­ 

153 21 139 259 16 6 6 58 10 3 760 456 403 9 33

99 96 98 99 100 ­ ­ 100 100 ­ 99 99 100 ­ 97

1 27 45 27 65.2 34.5 14 29 24 33 63.1 N/A 10 47 30 13 79.7 48.0 6 39 38 17 74.2 44.0 6 63 31 0 92.2 N/A ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 10 40 29 21 74.1 44.5 40 40 20 0 95.0 N/A ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 19 55 21 6 89.0 53.0 15 54 23 8 85.8 57.0 21 54 20 4 90.8 50.0 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 15 39 21 24 72.0 42.5

112 100 5 50 35 10 81.5 N/A 125 100 10 50 34 6 85.0 N/A

N/A  N/A 

859 99 18 54 22 6 88.2 52.0 847 100 21 54 19 6 89.3 52.0

108  16  99  187  14  ­  ­  42  5  ­  617  370  319  ­  26 

State Part. % at CPI SGP Incl. in Rate Each SGP (#) Level % A P NI W ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

689  ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 659  216,396 99 ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­ 

­ ­ ­  ­ 50.0 175,934 

   

ALL GRADES ­ MATHEMATICS

Student Group Subgroups Students w/disabilities ELL and Former ELL Econ. Disadvantaged High needs Afr. Amer./Black Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. Asian Hispanic/Latino Multi­race, Non­Hisp./Lat. Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. White Male Female ELL Ever ELL   All Students 2016 2015

School District Stud. Part. % at Each CPI SGP Incl. in Stud. Part. % at Each CPI SGP Incl. in Stud. Incl Rate Level SGP Incl Rate Level SGP Incl (#) (#) # % A P NI W # % A P NI W # 23 100 13 30 35 22 70.7 3 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 21 100 19 48 24 10 83.3 39 100 18 38 28 15 78.2 2 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 1 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 8 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 2 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 98 99 43 35 16 6 89.5 54 100 41 37 11 11 88.0 57 98 37 35 25 4 88.6 1 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 3 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

N/A ­ N/A N/A ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ N/A N/A N/A ­ ­

N/A  ­  N/A  N/A  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  N/A  N/A  N/A  ­  ­ 

156 22 140 261 16 6 6 58 10 4 760 459 401 9 34

100 100 99 100 100 ­ ­ 100 100 ­ 99 99 100 ­ 100

3 16 42 39 55.8 51.5 18 32 23 27 71.6 N/A 18 35 23 24 74.6 53.5 12 28 33 27 68.4 53.0 13 31 44 13 75.0 N/A ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 16 38 21 26 72.4 51.0 30 60 10 0 95.0 N/A ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 32 36 23 9 85.6 55.0 32 34 22 12 83.2 59.0 29 39 25 7 86.0 51.0 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 21 35 18 26 72.8 51.0

111 99 39 36 18 7 88.3 N/A 124 99 21 45 20 14 81.3 N/A

N/A  N/A 

860 99 31 36 23 10 84.5 53.5 848 100 29 38 22 11 84.9 48.0

108  16  98  187  14  ­  ­  41  5  ­  615  368  318  ­  25 

State Part. % at CPI SGP Incl. in Rate Each SGP (#) Level % A P NI W ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

686  ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 657  216,363 99 ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­

­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­  ­ 

­ ­ ­  ­ 50.0 176,568 

 

2016 Accountability Data ­ Lunenburg Primary School Accountability Information Accountability and Assistance Level

Level 2

Not meeting gap narrowing goals

This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1­99) All students:

­

This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1­100) Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)

On Target = 75 or higher ­  Less progress

More progress

All students

 36

Did Not Meet Target

High needs

 32

Did Not Meet Target

Econ. Disadvantaged

 

­

ELL and Former ELL

 

­

Students w/disabilities

 

­

Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.

 

­

Asian

 

­

Afr. Amer./Black

 

­

Hispanic/Latino

 

­

Multi­race, Non­Hisp./Lat.

 

­

Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.

 

White

­  36

Did Not Meet Target

 

Lunenburg Primary School: Accountability Data Detail 2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing  

Baseline 2015 CPI CPI

2016 CPI

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

CPI 2016 6 Year CPI Change Target Goal Percentile in School Type

N

PPI Points

Rating

All students

89.2

85.0

81.5

­3.5

91.9

94.6

20

112

0

Declined

High needs

77.9

71.8

64.7

­7.1

83.4

89.0

9

39

0

Declined

Econ. Disadvantaged

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

21

­

­

ELL and Former ELL

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

3

­

­

Students w/disabilities

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

23

­

­

Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Asian

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

1

­

­

Afr. Amer./Black

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

2

­

­

Hispanic/Latino

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

8

­

­

Multi­race, Non­Hisp./Lat.

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

2

­

­

Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

89.5

86.0

83.1

­2.9

92.1

94.8

16

99

0

Declined

Baseline 2015 CPI CPI

2016 CPI

N

PPI Points

Rating

White 2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing   0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

CPI 2016 6 Year CPI Change Target Goal Percentile in School Type

All students

91.4

81.3

88.3

7.0

93.6

95.7

41

111

50

Improved Below Target

High needs

81.8

61.2

78.2

17.0

86.4

90.9

42

39

50

Improved Below Target

Econ. Disadvantaged

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

21

­

­

ELL and Former ELL

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

3

­

­

Students w/disabilities

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

23

­

­

Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Asian

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

1

­

­

Afr. Amer./Black

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

2

­

­

Hispanic/Latino

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

8

­

­

Multi­race, Non­Hisp./Lat.

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

2

­

­

Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

92.9

82.7

89.5

6.8

94.7

96.5

36

98

50

Improved Below Target

Baseline CPI

2015 CPI

2016 CPI

White 2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing  

CPI 2016 Change Target

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

6 Year CPI Goal Percentile in School Type

N

PPI Points

Rating

All students

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

High needs

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Econ. Disadvantaged

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

ELL and Former ELL

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Students w/disabilities

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Asian

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Afr. Amer./Black

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Hispanic/Latino

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Multi­race, Non­Hisp./Lat.

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

White

 

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit  

Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) 2015 % Advanced

2016 % Advanced

N

All students

9.6

5.4

112

0

High needs

0.0

7.7

39

25

Econ. Disadvantaged

­

­

21

­

ELL and Former ELL

­

­

3

Students w/disabilities

­

­

Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.

­

Asian

Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more) 2016 % Warning/Failing

N

PPI Points

4.8

8.9

112

0

12.8

23.1

39

0

­

­

21

­

­

­

­

3

­

23

­

­

­

23

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

1

­

­

­

1

­

Afr. Amer./Black

­

­

2

­

­

­

2

­

Hispanic/Latino

­

­

8

­

­

­

8

­

Multi­race, Non­Hisp./Lat.

­

­

2

­

­

­

2

­

Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

10.5

5.1

99

0

2.6

7.1

99

0

White 2016 Mathematics Extra Credit

PPI Points

2015 % Warning/Failing

 

Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)

Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)

2015 % Advanced

2016 % Advanced

N

PPI Points

2015 % Warning/Failing

2016 % Warning/Failing

N

PPI Points

All students

21.0

38.7

111

25

High needs

5.3

17.9

39

25

13.7

6.3

111

25

34.2

12.8

39

Econ. Disadvantaged

­

­

21

25

­

­

­

21

ELL and Former ELL

­

­

­

3

­

­

­

3

Students w/disabilities

­

­

­

23

­

­

­

23

Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Asian

­

­

1

­

­

­

1

­

Afr. Amer./Black

­

­

2

­

­

­

2

­

Hispanic/Latino

­

­

8

­

­

­

8

­

Multi­race, Non­Hisp./Lat.

­

­

2

­

­

­

2

­

Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

20.4

42.9

98

25

11.5

5.1

98

25

White 2016 Science Extra Credit  

Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)

Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)

2015 % Advanced

2016 % Advanced

N

PPI Points

2015 % Warning/Failing

2016 % Warning/Failing

N

PPI Points

All students

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

High needs

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Econ. Disadvantaged

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

ELL and Former ELL

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Students w/disabilities

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Asian

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Afr. Amer./Black

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Hispanic/Latino

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Multi­race, Non­Hisp./Lat.

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

White

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

2016 English Language Arts Growth  

2015 SGP

2016 SGP

SGP 6 Year Change Goal

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Met Safe Harbor?

N

PPI Points

Rating

All students

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

High needs

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

Econ. Disadvantaged

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

ELL and Former ELL

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

Students w/disabilities

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

Asian

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

Afr. Amer./Black

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

Hispanic/Latino

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

Multi­race, Non­Hisp./Lat.

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

White

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

2016 Mathematics Growth  

2015 SGP

2016 SGP

SGP 6 Year Change Goal

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Met Safe Harbor?

N

PPI Points

Rating

All students

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

High needs

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

Econ. Disadvantaged

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

ELL and Former ELL

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

Students w/disabilities

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

Asian

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

Afr. Amer./Black

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

Hispanic/Latino

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

Multi­race, Non­Hisp./Lat.

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

White

 

­

­

­

51.0

­

­

­

­

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth 2016 SGPA

2016 Target

SGPA N Included

PPI Points

All students

 

­

60.0

8

­

High needs

­

60.0

8

­

ELL and Former ELL

­

60.0

8

­

2016 Assessment Participation  

English Language Arts

Mathematics

Science

Enrolled Assessed

%

Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed

%

Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)

All students

122

122

100

Yes

122

121

99

Yes

­

­

­

­

High needs

47

47

100

Yes

47

47

100

Yes

­

­

­

­

Econ. Disadvantaged

24

­

­

­

24

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

ELL and Former ELL

6

­

­

­

6

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Students w/disabilities

26

­

­

­

26

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Asian

2

­

­

­

2

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Afr. Amer./Black

2

­

­

­

2

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Hispanic/Latino

12

­

­

­

12

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Multi­race, Non­Hisp./Lat.

3

­

­

­

3

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

­

103

103

100

Yes

103

102

99

Yes

­

­

­

­

White

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

 

2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level About the Data NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html. The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.

GRADE LEVEL 4 ­ READING Student Group Avg. Scaled Score 235 209 200 217 249 215 242 220

All Students Stud. w/ Disab LEP African American/Black Asian/Pacific Islander Hispanic/Latino White Econ. Disadvantaged

A 14 2 1 3 31 3 17 5

Massachusetts % at Each Level P+ B+ BB % Assessed 50 82 18 100 20 55 45 18 12 44 56 9 25 65 35 7 68 89 11 6 25 61 39 19 58 89 11 65 29 67 33 42

Avg. Scaled Score 221 186 189 206 238 208 232 209

A 8 2 1 2 19 3 11 3

National Public % at Each Level P+ B+ BB % Assessed 35 68 32 100 12 33 67 13 8 32 68 11 18 51 49 15 53 81 19 5 21 54 46 26 46 79 21 49 21 56 44 55

A 7 2 1 1 22 3 10 2

National Public % at Each Level P+ B+ BB % Assessed 39 81 19 100 16 54 46 13 15 57 43 11 19 65 35 15 61 90 10 5 26 73 27 26 51 90 10 49 24 72 28 55

A 3 # # 1 9 1 4 1

National Public % at Each Level P+ B+ BB % Assessed 33 75 25 100 8 36 64 12 3 28 72 6 15 58 42 15 50 85 15 6 20 65 35 25 42 84 16 51 20 64 36 52

A 8 1 1 1 25 3 10 2

National Public % at Each Level P+ B+ BB % Assessed 32 70 30 100 8 32 68 12 5 31 69 6 12 47 53 15 58 86 14 6 19 60 40 25 42 81 19 51 18 58 42 52

GRADE LEVEL 4 ­ MATHEMATICS Student Group Avg. Scaled Score 251 231 223 230 273 232 256 236

All Students Stud. w/ Disab LEP African American/Black Asian/Pacific Islander Hispanic/Latino White Econ. Disadvantaged

A 13 4 2 1 38 3 15 4

Massachusetts % at Each Level P+ B+ BB % Assessed 54 90 10 100 25 74 26 18 17 65 35 9 26 73 27 7 81 98 2 6 28 74 26 19 62 95 5 65 31 80 20 42

Avg. Scaled Score 240 217 218 224 256 230 248 229

GRADE LEVEL 8 ­ READING Student Group Avg. Scaled Score 274 245 225 252 290 249 281 260

All Students Stud. w/ Disab LEP African American/Black Asian/Pacific Islander Hispanic/Latino White Econ. Disadvantaged

A 6 1 # 1 18 # 7 3

Massachusetts % at Each Level P+ B+ BB % Assessed 46 83 17 100 15 54 46 18 6 35 65 5 18 63 37 9 64 90 10 7 17 61 39 14 53 90 10 67 28 71 29 44

Avg. Scaled Score 264 229 223 247 279 253 273 253

GRADE LEVEL 8 ­ MATHEMATICS Student Group Avg. Scaled Score 297 264 251 268 324 271 304 279

All Students Stud. w/ Disab LEP African American/Black Asian/Pacific Islander Hispanic/Latino White Econ. Disadvantaged

A 18 3 2 4 44 4 20 7

Massachusetts % at Each Level P+ B+ BB % Assessed 51 81 19 100 16 51 49 18 10 38 62 6 22 54 46 9 73 94 6 7 24 61 39 15 59 88 12 66 31 67 33 43

Avg. Scaled Score 281 246 246 260 305 269 291 268

Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations. Grade/Subject

# in Sample

Grade 4 Reading Grade 4 Mathematics Grade 8 Reading Grade 8 Mathematics

3,100 3,200 3,000 3,100

% of Sample ­ Students with Disabilities 18 18 18 18

% of Sample ­ English Language Learners 9 9 5 6

% of Students Excluded from Original Sample 3 2 2 2