Name:
Williamson, Mark
Beginning Time: Employee ID:
Appraiser:
9:50
Lujan, Ysmael
Date:
2/25/2014
Campus:
PERMIAN HIGH SCHOOL
Assignment/Grade:
Professional Development And Apprai sal System
9, 10, 11, 12
Ending Time:
10:40
2012 Revision
019402
Observation Summary Summative Annual Appraisal
Domain I: Active, Successful Student Participation in the Learning Process Exceeds (x 5)
Proficient (x 3)
Below (x 1)
Domain II: Learner-Centered Instruction
Unsatisfactory (x 0)
Exceeds (x 5)
1. Engaged in learning
1. Goals and objectives
2. Successful in learning
2. Learner-centered
3. Critical thinking/ problem solving
3. Critical thinking and problem solving
4. Self-directed
4. Motivational strategies
5. Connects learning Subtotal
Total
0
12 Total:
1 20 12 4 0
to to to to
25 19 11 3
0
13
Exceeds Expectations Proficient Below Expectations Unsatisfactory
Comments:
Proficient (x 3)
Below (x 1)
Unsatisfactory (x 0)
5. Alignment 6. Pacing/sequencing 7. Value and importance 8. Appropriate questioning and inquiry 9. Use of technology Subtotal
Total
0
9 Total:
5 37 23 7 0
to to to to
45 36 22 6
0
14
Exceeds Expectations Proficient Below Expectations Unsatisfactory
Comments: Strengths
Areas to Address Students were engaged, but I did not see that all understood the lesson on parabola. While it was a review from previous learning, I would suggest to include a more varied instructional approach.
Strengths
1
Areas to Address Your objective was posted in the classroom and eduphoria. For materials, you mentioned that the smart board would be used, but this instructional tool was not used for another purpose than to put a document for visual. I suggest that Mr. Williamson use all instructional tools at his fingertips for delivery of instruction. Revised September As for alignment, Mr. Williamson needs2013 to follow the appropriate district curriculum sequence for delivery of instruction. Why do the students not have calculators in their hands?
Name:
Williamson, Mark
Beginning Time: Employee ID:
9:50
Appraiser:
Lujan, Ysmael
Date:
2/25/2014
Campus:
PERMIAN HIGH SCHOOL
Assignment/Grade:
Professional Development And Apprai sal System
9, 10, 11, 12
Ending Time:
10:40
2012 Revision
019402
Observation Summary Summative Annual Appraisal Williamson use all instructional tools at his fingertips for delivery of instruction. As for alignment, Mr. Williamson needs to follow the appropriate district curriculum sequence for delivery of instruction. Why do the students not have calculators in their hands?
Domain III: Evaluation and Feedback on Student Progress Exceeds (x 5)
Proficient (x 3)
Below (x 1)
Unsatisfactory (x 0)
1. Monitored and assessed 2. Assessment and instruction are aligned 3. Appropriate assessment 4. Learning reinforced 5. Constructive feedback 6. Relearning and re-evaluation
Total Subtotal
0
9 Total:
3 25 15 5 0
to to to to
30 24 14 4
0
12
Exceeds Expectations Proficient Below Expectations Unsatisfactory
Comments:
Strengths
2
Areas to Address I am not sure that there is positive communication with student. When you suggested to use gang sign as a reference to parabola. I am not sure that this is appropriate as an instructional strategy for the delivery of instruction. While students were participating in the lesson, it seemed that they practiced the correct answer to your questions. I did not observed any critical thinking or analysis of each September 2013 problem youRevised were working.
Name:
Williamson, Mark
Beginning Time: Employee ID:
9:50
Appraiser:
Lujan, Ysmael
Date:
2/25/2014
Campus:
PERMIAN HIGH SCHOOL
Assignment/Grade:
Professional Development And Apprai sal System
9, 10, 11, 12
Ending Time:
10:40
2012 Revision
019402
Observation Summary Summative Annual Appraisal to your questions. I did not observed any critical thinking or analysis of each problem you were working.
Domain IV: Management of Student Discipline, Instructional Strategies, Time, and Materials Exceeds (x 5)
Proficient (x 3)
Below (x 1)
Unsatisfactory (x 0)
1. Discipline procedures 2. Self-discipline and self-directed learning 3. Equitable teacherstudent interaction 4. Expectations for behavior 5. Redirects disruptive behavior 6. Reinforces desired behavior 7. Equitable and varied characteristics 8. Manages time and materials Subtotal
Total
0
24 Total:
0 34 20 6 0
to to to to
40 33 19 5
0
24
Exceeds Expectations Proficient Below Expectations Unsatisfactory
Comments:
Strengths
3
Areas to Address
Revised September 2013
Name:
Williamson, Mark
Beginning Time: Employee ID:
Appraiser:
9:50
Lujan, Ysmael
Date:
2/25/2014
Campus:
PERMIAN HIGH SCHOOL
Assignment/Grade:
Professional Development And Apprai sal System
9, 10, 11, 12
Ending Time:
10:40
2012 Revision
019402
Observation Summary Summative Annual Appraisal
Domain V: Professional Communication Exceeds (x 5)
Domain VI: Professional Development Proficient (x 3)
Below (x 1)
Unsatisfactory (x 0)
1. Written with students
1. Campus/district goals
2. Verbal/non-verbal with students
2. Student needs
Proficient (x 3)
Below (x 1)
Unsatisfactory (x 0)
0
0
0
0
3. Prior performance appraisal
3. Reluctant students 4. Written with parents, staff, community members, and other professionals
4. Improvement of student performance Subtotal
5. Verbal/non-verbal with parents, staff, community members, and other professionals
Total
Total:
6. Supportive, courteous Subtotal
Exceeds (x 5)
Total
0
12 Total:
1 25 15 5 0
to to to to
30 24 14 4
0
16 9 3 0
to to to to
20 15 8 2
NS
Exceeds Expectations Proficient Below Expectations Unsatisfactory
Comments:
13
Exceeds Expectations Proficient Below Expectations Unsatisfactory
Comments: Strengths
Strengths
Areas to Address
Areas to Address Mr. Williamson needs to be positive with the comments he makes to students. He would also need to support all district initiatives. Mr. Williamson needs to follow the district curriculum in reference to the YAG from the start of school, until school ends.
4
Revised September 2013
Name:
Williamson, Mark
Beginning Time: Employee ID:
Appraiser:
9:50
Lujan, Ysmael
Date:
2/25/2014
Campus:
PERMIAN HIGH SCHOOL
Assignment/Grade:
Professional Development And Apprai sal System
9, 10, 11, 12
Ending Time:
10:40
2012 Revision
019402
Observation Summary Summative Annual Appraisal
Domain VII: Compliance With Policies, Operating Procedures, and Requirements Exceeds (x 5)
Proficient (x 3)
Below (x 1)
Unsatisfactory (x 0)
Comments:
1. Policies, procedures, and legal requirements 2. Verbal/written directives 3. Environment
Total Strengths
Subtotal Total:
13 9 3 0
to to to to
15 12 8 2
Areas to Address
Exceeds Expectations Proficient Below Expectations Unsatisfactory
5
Revised September 2013
Name:
Williamson, Mark
Beginning Time: Employee ID:
Appraiser:
9:50
Lujan, Ysmael
Date:
2/25/2014
Campus:
PERMIAN HIGH SCHOOL
Assignment/Grade:
Professional Development And Apprai sal System
9, 10, 11, 12
Ending Time:
10:40
2012 Revision
019402
Observation Summary Summative Annual Appraisal
Domain VIII: Improvement of Academic Performance Of All Students on the Campus Exceeds (x 5)
Proficient (x 3)
Below (x 1)
Comments:
Unsatisfactory (x 0)
1. Aligns instruction 2. Analyzes state assessment data 3. Appropriate sequence 4. Appropriate materials 5. Monitors student performance 6. Monitors attendance 7. Students in at-risk situations 8. Appropriate plans for intervention Strengths
9. Modifies and adapts
Areas to Address
Total 1-9 Subtotal 1-9 PLUS 10. Campus Performance Rating of: A. Recognized Academically Unacceptable
=
2
_______
=
0
_______
Final Total Domain VIII
Signature of Appraiser:
Date:
My appraiser has given me a copy of this Observation Summary Report. (Sum of 1-10)
Signature of Teacher:
Date:
Observation Summary
**Teachers's 1st Teacher's Subsequent Year on Campus Years on Campus Total: 37 to 45 Exceeds Expectations 38 to 47 23 to 36 Proficient 24 to 37 7 to 22 Below Expectations 8 to 23 0 to 6 Unsatisfactory 0 to 7 **Campus performance rating or AYP not scored as per Commissioner's Rules, Ch. 150.1002(f)
Signature of Appraiser:
Date:
My appraiser and I have discussed this Summative Annual Appraisal Report. Signature of Teacher:
Date:
Summative Annual Appraisal
6
Revised September 2013
