CORPUS CHRISTI INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Corpus Christi, Texas DISTRICT GRADING GUIDELINES 2016-2017 The purpose of grades is to communicate to parents/guardians the academic achievement of a student toward the mastery of standards in all coursework including courses with Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) and those with standards: student expectations found in program descriptions for Dual Credit (DC), Advanced Placement (AP), International Baccalaureate (IB), and Advanced Technical Credit (ATC) courses. Report cards and progress

reports serve as written notice to a parent/guardian of a student’s current level of achievement in each class, subject, or course during a specified period of time. Grades are not indicators of disciplinary action or nonacademic performance. The District requires a combined use of the following grading practices:  



Multiple measures (more than one type of assessment to examine the same kind of knowledge as well as more than one assessment to evaluate learning of the same body of knowledge). Use of defined performance criteria including Rubrics, for which student responses, products, or performances are evaluated to ensure consistency in scoring and clarity of student performance expectations. Continuous and timely feedback on assessments.

Guidelines for grading student work in all courses include: 1. Grades entered in the teacher's gradebook and report card grades will reflect progress toward and achievement of knowledge and skills as outlined in the TEKS and DC, AP, IB, and ATC program course descriptions. Teachers shall enter grades into Teacher Access Center, the District’s electronic gradebook on a weekly basis for Interim Progress Reports (IPR) and CCISD Connect updates. 2. A minimum of six (6) separate grades during a six-week reporting period must be recorded for each class. An average of one grade for each class shall be recorded weekly in the District’s electronic gradebook. 3. No single recorded grade shall be weighted more than 25 percent of the final grade for any reporting period. 4. Mid-course and end-of-course (EOC) examinations may be administered at the secondary level. The decision to administer a mid-course or end-of-course examination shall be consistent across the academic department and must be submitted in writing to the Campus Advisory Team (CAT) for final approval. The weight value of the mid-course and end-of-course examination must not be more than 25 percent of the final grade for any six-week reporting period. Mid-course and end-of-course examination exemptions are not permitted. 5. A student found to have engaged in academic dishonesty shall be subject to grade penalties on assignments or tests as well as disciplinary penalties in accordance with the Student Code of Conduct. EIA (Local) Grade penalties shall be consistent across campus. 6. The teacher of record shall determine the final yearly grade by averaging together the final grades for each 1 of 4

2016-2017 District Grading Guidelines Page 2 reporting period. 7. For purposes of Dual Credit, the final grade must be submitted according to the college grade reporting deadline and shall determine the final grade for the District. 8. Grade changes are the responsibility of the teacher of record. For purposes of Dual Credit, no grade changes may be made after submission to the college without approval of the college department chair. 9. When grades are determined to be mathematically incorrect, the principal shall direct the teacher to adjust the grade. EIA (Local) 10. In accordance with campus grading guidelines, a student may be permitted a reasonable opportunity to redo an assignment or retake a test within the grading period for which the student received a failing grade. Campus grading guidelines shall define the opportunity, time frame, and grade to be awarded. 11. A student shall receive a grade of zero for any assignment or test not made up within the allotted time. The allotted time to make up work or tests that have been missed consists of one day for each day’s absence. 12. A student may receive a grade penalty not to exceed 20 percent for makeup work after an unexcused absence. 13. A teacher shall not impose a grade penalty for makeup work after an absence because of suspension. 14. A student shall be permitted to take tests administered in any class missed because of an absence. 15. A teacher shall not impose a grade penalty for a student whose attendance drops below 90 percent of the days the class is offered. A student who does not meet the attendance requirement and is not granted extenuating circumstances by the campus attendance committee (FEC Local) shall be denied credit; however, the final grade earned by the student shall not be altered. For a student not enrolled in a creditearning course and whose attendance drops below 90 percent, alternatives to retention may be considered by the campus attendance committee. 16. The teacher shall request a parent/teacher conference when a student is not achieving progress toward or achievement of the TEKS. EIA (Local) 17. A student or parent who feels that the grade received by the student has not been determined according to the District/Campus grading guidelines must discuss the concern with the teacher. If the concern is not resolved, the student or parent may present the concern to the principal. The principal shall investigate the facts to ensure that the grade is accurate and was determined in accordance with the established grading guidelines. EIA (Local) 18. Each campus principal and staff shall: a. Disseminate the District Grading Guidelines and Campus Grading Guidelines to all teachers, students, 2 of 4

2016-2017 District Grading Guidelines Page 3 and parents. b. Communicate, discuss, and review the District and Campus grading guidelines to ensure that they are understood by all stakeholders (teachers, students, and parents) at the beginning of the school year and twice yearly thereafter. c. Ensure that each grade-level team or department develops consistent grading and examination procedures that are in accordance with Board policies, administrative regulations, state-prescribed TEKS, program course descriptions, and District Grading Guidelines. Campus Grading Guidelines shall address grade weighting, makeup work, late work, and opportunities for redoing assignments. The Campus Grading Guidelines are to be approved with signatures by the Campus Advisory Team (CAT). d. Determine a consistent late penalty to any assignment or project turned in after the due date. e. Maintain a copy of the District Grading Guidelines and a signed copy of the Campus Grading Guidelines in the school’s library and in the principal’s office not later than five workdays after the beginning of a course. EIA (Local) f.

Submit a copy of the Campus Grading Guidelines to the appropriate School Director and Executive Director for Educational Support by the tenth day of the new school year.

CRITERIA FOR PROMOTION Students shall be promoted or awarded credit based on the following: 1. Grades 1, 2, and 3 -- A final grade of 70 or above in each of the following: language arts, reading, and mathematics. 2. Grades 4 and 5 -- A final grade of 70 or above in each of the following: language arts, reading, mathematics, science, and social studies. 3. Grades 6, 7, and 8 -- A final grade of 70 or above in each of the following: language arts, mathematics, science, social studies, and a composite average of 70 or above in all courses taken. High school credit is earned for certain courses taken in middle school based on a final grade average of 70 or above in the course. Failure of a student to earn credit in one of the high school credit courses shall not cause the student to be retained. 4. Grades 3-8 Texas Assessment Program -- A student who fails any state-mandated assessment must receive accelerated instruction in the applicable subject area, which may include instruction outside of normal school operating hours. Grades 5-8 Texas Assessment Program -- A student who fails the state-mandated assessments in reading or mathematics and who is promoted to the next grade level must complete the required accelerated instruction as a condition of promotion by the Grade Placement Committee (GPC) and must 3 of 4

2016-2017 District Grading Guidelines Page 4 be assigned a teacher in the next grade level who meets state and federal qualifications to teach the subject in which the student failed. 5. Grades 9, 10, 11, and 12 -- High school credit is earned based on a final grade average of 70 or above in the course. GRADE PLACEMENT COMMITTEE The District shall notify the parent or guardian of a student who has failed to demonstrate proficiency on the first administration of a grade advancement test. The following information should be made available to the parent or guardian within five working days of the District’s receipt of student test results: a description of the District’s grade advancement policy, notice of accelerated instruction to which the student has been assigned, and notice of the possibility that the student might be retained at the same grade level for the next school year. In addition, the notice shall encourage parents or guardians to meet immediately with the student’s teacher to outline mutual responsibilities to support the student during accelerated instruction. (EIE Legal) After a student fails to perform satisfactorily on an assessment instrument the second time, a GPC shall be established to prescribe the accelerated instruction the student is to receive before the assessment instrument is administered the third time. All efforts of support and the accelerated instructional plan shall be documented in the District’s instructional management system. 06/21/2016

4 of 4

2016-2017 District Grading Guidelines 6.21.16.pdf

2016-2017 District Grading Guidelines 6.21.16.pdf. 2016-2017 District Grading Guidelines 6.21.16.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu. Displaying ...

128KB Sizes 3 Downloads 162 Views

Recommend Documents

Grading Guidelines 2016.pdf
The allotted time to make up work or tests that have been missed. consists of one day for each day's absence. EIAB (Local). Students shall receive a grade ...

Grading Guidelines 2016.pdf
because of suspension. ... The policy for a chord in metro is that the student remain in the program up until the end of the first ... Grading Guidelines 2016.pdf.

ECDC Grading Guidelines 2016 CAT approved.pdf
Student shall receive a grade of zero for any ... ECDC Grading Guidelines 2016 CAT approved.pdf. ECDC Grading Guidelines 2016 CAT approved.pdf. Open.

Hamlin Grading Guidelines 2016-2017.pdf
Band/Theatre Arts/Spanish/Art/Choir/Orchestra/Technology Applications/Reading and Math. Support/AVID: All grades are weighted equally. Physical Education: ...

ECDC Grading Guidelines 2016 CAT approved.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. ECDC Grading ...

Campus Grading Guidelines 2016- 2017.pdf
accelerated instruction as a condition of promotion by the Grade Placement Committee (GPC) and. must be assigned a teacher in the next grade level who ...

DEE - ONLINE DISTRICT TRANSFER NORMS & GUIDELINES REG ...
DEE - ONLINE DISTRICT TRANSFER NORMS & GUIDELINES REG PROC.pdf. DEE - ONLINE DISTRICT TRANSFER NORMS & GUIDELINES REG PROC.pdf.

Recycling Letter-20162017.pdf
Page 1 of 1. NEW BRUNSWICK BOARD OF EDUCATION. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS. 268 Baldwin Street – P.O. Box 2683.

DakotaProfile 20162017.pdf
... Virginia Tech University. Drake University Northeastern University* University of Illinois* Wake Forest University*. Page 2 of 2. DakotaProfile 20162017.pdf.

Staffing Guidelines 2017-2018 District Staffing ...
Enter advertisements into the Electronic Staffing System for the current vacant positions at their school. 2. ... All applications will be accepted from teachers for the open advertisements until ​9:00. AM on Monday ..... Signature: Calgary Roman .

DakotaProfile 20162017.pdf
Page 1 of 2. School Profile 2016-2017. Dakota Ridge High School. Aspires to help all members of its community develop a sense of balance and synergy from the four basic. human needs: the need to live, the need to love, the need to learn, and the need

AMERICAN STUDIES 20162017 FINAL PDF VERSION.pdf ...
AMERICAN STUDIES 20162017 FINAL PDF VERSION.pdf. AMERICAN STUDIES 20162017 FINAL PDF VERSION.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In.

Grading Guidelines.pdf
Whoops! There was a problem loading this page. Whoops! There was a problem loading this page. Grading Guidelines.pdf. Grading Guidelines.pdf. Open.

20162017 Support Staff HandbookFinal.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. 20162017 ...

Oral Presentation Grading Rubric
Nonverbal Skills. 4 – Exceptional. 3 – Admirable. 2 – Acceptable. 1 – Poor. Eye Contact. Holds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact ...

Grading Manual.pdf
Appendix H: PowerSchool Parent Acceptable Use ... Leslie Dowling Roberta Montgomery Angela Tomlin-Hart ... Dana Fall Mary Kay Norton Dana Williams.

10 point grading scale
9th graders earn “quality points” for taking courses at a more rigorous level. Students in grades 10-12 will continue to earn quality points the same as in years ...

Grading Policy.pdf
Grading Policy.pdf. Grading Policy.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu. Displaying Grading Policy.pdf. Page 1 of 1.

Grading
Candidates use sources of information to research career areas ... career areas, giving sound information on how ... likely to be in the form of a list. Candidates ...

KBS 20162017 Student Handbook Final.pdf
Megan Smallwood Teacher. Misty Sparks Teacher. Sallie Speir Teacher. Julie Spence Teacher. Glennisha Stanley Teacher. Peggy Trammell Teacher. Elizabeth Tucker Teacher. Jan Turpin Teacher. Judy Walker Teacher. Patricia Watson Psychologist. Sandy Watso

KBS 20162017 Student Handbook Final.pdf
Ashley Wilson Paraprofessional. Page 3 of 39. KBS 20162017 Student Handbook Final.pdf. KBS 20162017 Student Handbook Final.pdf. Open. Extract.

Discrimination in Grading - Leigh Linden
human capital investments (Mechtenberg 2009; Tajfel 1970; Arrow 1972; Coate and. Loury 1993). Additionally, since such external evaluations are often used to deter- mine access .... discrimination against black children in Brazil. While these studies

Grading system - Asia.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. Grading system ...

grading-plan-view.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item.