Appendix G
Fit for the Future Student Overview David Law, superintendent
Page 67
Elementary school level Grades kindergarten through five
• • • •
All-day-every-day kindergarten in all schools. Math curriculum includes hands-on learning approach. Science focuses on inquiry and discovery. Language arts includes reading, writing, speaking, spelling, listening, and thinking skills. • Specialists teach elementary art, media, music, and physical education. • Discovery Education video library for all subjects. • Challenging talent development opportunities in all schools.
Middle school level Grades six through eight
• Variety of elective courses offered in each grade. • Advanced courses available. – Includes pre-engineering.
• High school credit for advanced math and world languages classes. • Help available for students in basic skills areas. – Taken in addition to regular language arts or math courses.
• Students exceed the state average on all state tests – reading, math and science.
High school level Grades nine through twelve
• Something for everyone with nearly 400 courses. • Goal is to prepare all students for post-secondary success. • Many college credit courses available: Advanced Placement, Honors, International Baccalaureate, College in the Schools, Tech Prep (STEP). • Top awards in band, orchestra and choir competitions. • National competitors in career and technical competitions (DECA, VICA, BPA, HOSA, etc.). • Extensive extracurricular opportunities: athletics, fine arts, academic competitions, student-led clubs.
Career and technical Unique programs available to district students
• Secondary Technical Education Program (STEP) for 11th and 12th graders. • Anoka-Hennepin Technical High School for 18 to 21-year-olds. • Features of both schools: – High school in a college setting, being part of the Anoka Technical College campus. – Collaboration with college. – Students can earn college credit.
Online high school A program called StepAhead
• StepAhead is a full-time online high school offered through Anoka-Hennepin. • Offers a complete high school curriculum that meets all state graduation requirements. • Students attending StepAhead have an opportunity to earn free college credit.
Space needs differ • Space needs differ based on grade level, course of study and student activities.
Students enrolled
5000
0 39,024 39,326 39,947 39,948 39,939 39,836 39,800 40,151 40,104 39,819 39,164 38,559 38,181 37,532 37,170 36,758 36,646 36,478 36,556 36,721
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
38,245
37,395
1995 1996
37,041
36,129
35,144
34,194
45000
1994
1993
1992
1991
33,191
10000
1990
15000 32,653
20000
1989
25000 32,190
30000
1988
35000 31,530
40000
1987
Enrollment
Student enrollment from 1985 to 2015-16, includes the 2016-17 projection
Fall enrollment counts (Oct. 1)
*Figures do not include students enrolled in Early Childhood Special Education or alternative programs (nearly 2,000 additional students in such programs).
Demographics Students of color
Demographics Free or reduced price lunch
Demographics Limited English students
Population change High school level
Population change Middle school level
Population change Elementary level
Other pressures on space To be explored by Fit for the Future
• Change to all-day-every-day kindergarten creates need for more space. • Due to lack of space, preschool programs must be relocated from year to year. • The state may increase preschool options creating a potential need for more space. • Building permits are on the rise in several cities in Anoka-Hennepin.
Comments and questions anoka.k12.mn.us
Facility Overview “Fit for the Future” Facility Use Task Force Chuck Holden, chief operations officer April 14, 2016
Demographic snapshot Who makes up Anoka-Hennepin
• District residents: – 78% in Anoka County. – 22% in Hennepin County.
• • • • • •
231,752 citizens. 83,968 households. 34% of households have children attending our schools. Current enrollment is approximately 38,000 students. Both parents work in 72% of district households. Average commute is 25 minutes.
One district, many cities • Anoka-Hennepin includes all or parts of the following cities: – – – – – – –
Andover Anoka Blaine Brooklyn Center* Brooklyn Park* Champlin Coon Rapids
*Less than half of the city is in Anoka-Hennepin.
– – – – – –
Dayton Fridley* Ham Lake Nowthen* Oak Grove* Ramsey
Thirteen cities, two counties • The school district was formed in 1952 through consolidation. Residents in a number of small-town and rural school districts voted to combine their resources to provide a better education. Today the district’s 172 square miles include urban, suburban and rural areas. • A school district is categorized as a “government unit,” separate from cities and counties, which are also government units.
Where are students educated? • The Anoka-Hennepin School District offers educational programs from birth to age 22 in a variety of facilities. – The majority of our students attend traditional elementary (K-5), middle (6-8) and high (9-12) schools. – Anoka-Hennepin also offers programs in alternative settings, mall locations, portable classrooms, and other lease site locations across the school district.
Map of the district Includes elementary, middle and high school locations
Facility philosophy • Historically, Anoka-Hennepin has been conservative in adding school buildings and has based any such decisions on enrollment projections and demographic trends. • In the past, portable classrooms were added to schools to allow for growth spikes, but these classrooms are aging, and present maintenance and security challenges. • Most recently, Anoka-Hennepin has added permanent additions to schools to provide for stability of boundaries and allow for growth.
Facility breakdown • • • • • • • •
24 Elementary buildings. 6 Middle schools. 5 Traditional high schools. Anoka-Hennepin Regional High School. Anoka-Hennepin Technical High School. Secondary Technical Education Program (STEP). Compass program. River Trail Learning Center.
Facility breakdown • • • •
Andover downtown center (Bridges and more). Coon Rapids Family Center. Pathways program. Various small sites for early childhood family education, early childhood special education and other programs. • 5.3 million square feet in schools. • Schools are community centers. Our facilities are used for Adventures Plus school-age care, athletics and more.
Comments and questions anoka.k12.mn.us
Redesigning school libraries Fit for the Future: May 2016
Redesign for learners • Changing learners, changing needs – “Digital in person” learners – Flexible personal and instructional spaces to meet their needs
Redesign for learners • Safe, welcoming, inviting • Flexible arrangements of space, time, technology, and people • Well-designed formal, social and personal spaces
Anoka High School 1971
Anoka High School 2016+
Create a learner for life • Welcome digital learners who interact with each other, the resources, and the staff by designing for: – Better health • Good quality lighting that matches the task • Good quality ergonomic seating • Indoor air quality improvements
A learner for life • Digital spaces – Personal spaces • Increase access to power • Comfort for quiet reading, reflection, relaxation
– Collaborative spaces • Projection screens • Conference tables/chairs
Demographic Change & Anoka-‐ Hennepin School District Tom Gillaspy June 2016
[email protected]
Recent Anoka-‐Hennepin School District Enrollment Trends • Total enrollment rela:vely stable the past three years • Modest declines past 6 years consistent with some neighboring districts • High school declines consistent with state trend, long an:cipated. • Strong grade progression ra:os in the past year helped boost enrollment—(non-‐public to public, migra:on, open enrollment)
[email protected]
Anoka-‐Hennepin K-‐12 Enrollment Trend 45000 40000
40416
41028
99-‐00
04-‐05
39100
37667
37448
37127
37220
09-‐10
12-‐13
13-‐14
14-‐15
15-‐16
35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 Mn Dept of Ed data
[email protected]
Average Annual Change In Enrollment Of Selected Districts (2009-‐10 to 2015-‐16) Anoka-‐Hennepin
-‐0.77%
Elk River
0.56%
Minneapolis
1.04%
Forest lake St. Francis Centennial
-‐0.81% -‐2.57% -‐0.60%
Fridley
1.00%
Spring Lake Park Osseo
3.12% -‐0.32%
-‐4.0% -‐3.0% -‐2.0% -‐1.0% 0.0% Mn Dept of Ed data
[email protected]
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
Anoka-‐Hennepin Enrollment Trend By Grade Cluster 12000 10000 8000 2009-‐10
6000
2012-‐13 2015-‐16
4000 2000 0 K-‐2 Mn Dept Of Educ
3 to 6
7 to 9
[email protected]
10 to 12
Anoka-‐Hennepin Grade Progressions From 2014-‐15 To 2015-‐16 10-‐11 9-‐10 8-‐9 7-‐8 6-‐7 5-‐6 4-‐5 3-‐4 2-‐3 1-‐2 K-‐1 0.99
1
1.01
1.02
[email protected]
1.03
1.04
1.05
Minnesota Demographic Trends Important For EducaTon
[email protected]
Convergence of PopulaTon Growth Rates 5%
6 Exurban Coun:es
4%
3 core suburban
3%
2 central metro
2% 1% 0% -‐1%
Census Bureau estimates
[email protected]
Minnesota Births In 2010, 8.9% Fewer Than Projected 80000 75000 70000 Kindergarten this year
65000 60000 55000
Gradua:ng HS This Year
Births Proj Births Proj Rev 2014
50000
Mn State Demographer and Dept of Health
[email protected]
Anoka County Births Peaked In 2007; Recovered A Bit In Past Two Years 5000 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Mn Dept of Health
[email protected]
Annual Average Minnesota Change In Selected Age Groups 75+
2.5% 2.8%
65 to 74 15 to 17
0.0%
12 to 14 -‐0.5%
0 to 4 -‐1%
4.4%
0.7% 2020-‐25
0.8% 0.3%
8 to 11 -‐0.4% 5 to 7
3.8%
0.0% 0.0% 0%
2015-‐20
0.3% 0.3% 1%
Minnesota State Demographer
2%
3%
[email protected]
4%
5%
Most Minnesota Household Growth 2010-‐20 Will Be Older Empty Nesters And Older Living Alone By 2020, empty nesters will be the largest type of family
Minnesota State Demographic Center projec:on Gillaspy Demographics
Budget Pressures Will Change More 65+ Than School Age by 2020 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000
18-24
1,000,000
65+
800,000
5-17
600,000 400,000 200,000 0
Census counts & State Demographer projec:on, revised Jan 2012
[email protected]
Change In Anoka-‐Hennepin District PopulaTon—Rapid Increase In 55+ Change 2010-‐14 85+ 75 to 84 65 to 74 60 to 64 55 to 59 45 to 54 35 to 44 25 to 34 20 to 24 15 to 19 10 to 14 5 to 9 Under 5
-‐10%
-‐5%
Census Bureau
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
[email protected]
25%
30%
35%
40%
Projected Anoka County PopulaTon Change 2015-‐2025—Average Annual Rate 85+ 80 to 84 75 to 79 70 to 74 65 to 69 60 to 64 55 to 59 50 to 54 45 to 49 40 to 44 35 to 39 30 to 34 25 to 29 20 to 24 15 to 19 10 to 14 5 to 9 0 to 4
-‐4.0%
-‐2.0%
Mn State Demographer
0.0%
2.0%
[email protected]
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
Minnesota Will Grow More Diverse; Remain Less Diverse Than The NaTon
State Demographer, 2010 Census & Census Bureau projec:ons
[email protected]
Percent Minority 2010 Is Highest At Younger Ages
2010 Census
[email protected]
Minnesota And Anoka-‐Hennepin Schools Are Increasingly Language Diverse Number Non-‐English Languages Percent of Enrollment State 09-‐10
94
12.1%
State 15-‐16
251
14.8%
Anoka-‐Hennepin 09-‐10
58
12.9%
Anoka-‐Hennepin 15-‐16
118
15.5%
[email protected]
Over The Next Decade • Growth will be more concentrated in established neighborhoods • Re:red popula:on will increase rapidly • Births will remain rela:vely stable • School enrollments will change rela:vely lible • Racial and language diversity will increase
[email protected]
Resident Demographics ANOKA-‐‑HENNEPIN SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 9, 2016
Assessing the Need for Facility Planning 1. Resident Demographics (today’s topic) 2. Student/Family Needs & Choices 3. Facility Capacity, Resources & Programs
Demographic Trends Residents, Families, and Housing Construction
Anoka-‐Hennepin Boundary Area -‐ Households and Families 2010
2012
2014
Pct. Chg. 2010-‐14
Households (Occupied housing units) Persons per household Dwelling type * Single unit dwellings * Multi-‐unit and mobile homes
79,748 80,873 83,078 2.76 2.74 2.74
4.2%
68,185 69,470 71,447 11,563 11,403 11,631
4.8% 0.6%
Families w/kids under age 18 Under age 6 only Under age 6 and age 6 to 17 Age 6 to 17 only
30,306 7,395 5,758 17,123
29,470 6,925 5,422 17,122
28,975 6,461 5,447 17,066
Source : US Census Bureau, American Community Survey
-‐4.4% -‐12.6% -‐5.4% -‐0.3%
Fewer Families with School Age Children The number of families with school age children living in the district has decreased despite increases in occupied housing units. Most of this decrease is in families with younger children.
Anoka-‐Hennepin Boundary Area -‐ Resident Ages
Population Ages Under age 5 5 to 14 years 15 to 17 years 18 to 24 years 25 to 34 years 35 to 44 years 45 to 64 years 65 years or older
2010
2012
2014
222,677 15,365 33,179 11,134 18,705 30,061 34,960 60,791 18,481
223,385 14,967 32,838 10,946 18,318 29,487 33,061 62,993 20,775
229,083 14,890 32,988 10,538 18,785 30,468 32,529 65,519 23,366
Pct. Chg. 2010-‐14
Source : US Census Bureau, American Community Survey
2.9% -‐3.1% -‐0.6% -‐5.4% 0.4% 1.4% -‐7.0% 7.8% 26.4%
Some Rebound in Younger Adult Households. Shrinking base of school age children district-‐‑wide. Decreases in the 35 to 44 adult age group have been partially offset by a rebound in adults ages 25 to 34. Younger adult pu]ing off having children?
New Births -‐‑ Downward Trend may be Slowing. Declines were most pronounced during the recessionary years. Birth were up as housing conditions improved, but have slowed again in recent years.
New Housing Occupancy (Building Permits Issued in Prior Year) AHSD Cities Andover Anoka Coon Rapids Now Then Oak Grove Ramsey Champlin Dayton Fridley (est. part) Blaine (est. part) Brooklyn Park (est. part)
2012 58 2 26 7 6 23 8 8 7 34 8 187
2013 152 64 33 6 22 295 11 16 1 40 14 654
2014 98 11 115 9 55 164 10 40 1 37 17 557
2015 52 121 11 10 38 66 10 43 10 39 14 414
Sources: Metropolitan Council; Excensus LLC
2016 74 26 29 20 30 292 96 74 1 54 42 738
5-‐Year Total 434 224 214 52 151 840 135 181 20 204 95 2,550
Half of the New Construction Permits over the last five years have been in Ramsey and Andover Champlin and Dayton had sizable gains affecting growth this year, while Anoka and Coon Rapids had growth earlier in the period.
Implications • Despite household increases, the number of families with children continues to decline district-‐‑wide. • In-‐‑area births and pre-‐‑kindergarten counts continue to fall, but may be leveling off. What will young (“Millennial”) families look like? • 5-‐‑year forecast calls for li]le or no in-‐‑district student growth. • Pockets of residential growth suggest need for targeted school and boundary area growth strategies.
Elementary Students by Home Location Sizing the residential pool by elementary a]endance area.
Elementary Student Growth in Six Areas • The number of elementary students living in the District decreased by 252 between May 1, 2014 and May 1, 2016. • Resident student increases occurred in six a]endance areas – Jefferson, Johnsville, Oxbow Creek, Ramsey, Sand Creek, and Wilson.
AHSD Grade K-‐5 Students by Home Attendance Area Elementary Attendance Area May-‐14 Adams Elementary 590 Andover Elementary 1,235 Champlin-‐Brooklyn Park Academy 734 Crooked Lake Elementary 465 Dayton Elementary 509 Eisenhower Elementary 707 Evergreen Park Elementary 521 Franklin Elementary 551 Hamilton Elementary 553 Hoover Elementary 583 Jefferson Elementary 726 Johnsville Elementary 700 Lincoln Elementary 426 Madison Elementary 460 McKinley Elementary 731 Mississippi Elementary 491 Monroe Elementary 515 Morris Bye Elementary 454 Oxbow Creek Elementary 1,036 Ramsey Elementary 1,341 Rum River Elementary 898 Sand Creek Elementary 741 University Avenue Elementary 593 Wilson Elementary 518 Elementary Total 16,078
May-‐15 576 1,212 691 449 504 691 540 532 569 554 713 743 431 461 723 459 481 430 1,029 1,391 878 777 594 554 15,982
May-‐16 532 1,203 705 446 482 713 537 475 538 526 744 768 412 462 721 453 448 414 1,055 1,388 876 785 574 569 15,826
2-‐Yr Pct. Change -‐9.8% -‐2.6% -‐4.0% -‐4.1% -‐5.3% 0.8% 3.1% -‐13.8% -‐2.7% -‐9.8% 2.5% 9.7% -‐3.3% 0.4% -‐1.4% -‐7.7% -‐13.0% -‐8.8% 1.8% 3.5% -‐2.4% 5.9% -‐3.2% 9.8% -‐1.6%
Sources : Anoka-‐Hennepin School District SIS; GuideK12 LLC
Kindergarten Student Growth in Three Areas • The number of kindergarten students living in the District decreased by 99 between May 1, 2014 and May 1, 2016. • Modest kindergarten increases occurred in just three a]endance areas – Andover, Johnsville, and Oxbow Creek. • Ramsey has the largest base of resident kindergarteners. A quarter of all kindergarteners live in four areas.
AHSD Kindergarten Students by Home Attendance Area Elementary Attendance Area May-‐14 Adams Elementary 91 Andover Elementary 151 Champlin-‐Brooklyn Park Academy 147 Crooked Lake Elementary 84 Dayton Elementary 85 Eisenhower Elementary 134 Evergreen Park Elementary 88 Franklin Elementary 88 Hamilton Elementary 98 Hoover Elementary 102 Jefferson Elementary 106 Johnsville Elementary 110 Lincoln Elementary 72 Madison Elementary 74 McKinley Elementary 99 Mississippi Elementary 81 Monroe Elementary 71 Morris Bye Elementary 65 Oxbow Creek Elementary 159 Ramsey Elementary 213 Rum River Elementary 122 Sand Creek Elementary 126 University Avenue Elementary 107 Wilson Elementary 114 Elementary Total 2,587
May-‐15 83 175 105 70 62 110 86 85 89 96 114 132 91 80 115 82 76 77 152 247 133 136 105 92 2,593
May-‐16 76 185 114 71 69 132 85 83 95 74 111 123 65 75 102 64 71 73 176 201 125 120 96 102 2,488
2-‐Year Change -‐15 34 -‐33 -‐13 -‐16 -‐2 -‐3 -‐5 -‐3 -‐28 5 13 -‐7 1 3 -‐17 0 8 17 -‐12 3 -‐6 -‐11 -‐12 -‐99
Sources : Anoka-‐Hennepin School District SIS; GuideK12 LLC
Impact of In-‐‑District Transfers and/or Placements • In-‐‑district transfers and program placements can have a significant impact on school enrollment and space needs. • Five a]endance areas showed sizable net gains, while three others experienced large net losses.
AHSD Grade K-‐5 -‐ In-‐Area and After-‐Transfers In-‐Area Residents Elementary Attendance Area May-‐16 Adams Elementary 532 Andover Elementary 1,203 Champlin-‐Brooklyn Park Academy 705 Crooked Lake Elementary 446 Dayton Elementary 482 Eisenhower Elementary 713 Evergreen Park Elementary 537 Franklin Elementary 475 Hamilton Elementary 538 Hoover Elementary 526 Jefferson Elementary 744 Johnsville Elementary 768 Lincoln Elementary 412 Madison Elementary 462 McKinley Elementary 721 Mississippi Elementary 453 Monroe Elementary 448 Morris Bye Elementary 414 Oxbow Creek Elementary 1,055 Ramsey Elementary 1,388 Rum River Elementary 876 Sand Creek Elementary 785 University Avenue Elementary 574 Wilson Elementary 569 Elementary Total 15,826
After Transfers May-‐16 521 1,306 819 471 452 658 443 406 413 492 722 790 454 471 711 437 530 513 1,056 1,239 907 810 563 642 15,826
Net Impact In/(out) (11) 103 114 25 (30) (55) (94) (69) (125) (34) (22) 22 42 9 (10) (16) 82 99 1 (149) 31 25 (11) 73 -‐
Sources : Anoka-‐Hennepin School District SIS; GuideK12 LLC
Challenges • The resident pool of elementary students is declining overall, but there are six a]endance areas with notable increases. • Current in-‐‑district transfers and program placements can significantly shift school-‐‑level enrollment counts – upward and downward. This is a particular challenge for long rang facility planning.
Upcoming Sessions • Facility enrollment capacity, classrooms, and program space needs. • School choice impacts – adding in the out-‐‑of-‐‑district student pool. • Grade progression path -‐‑ middle and high school impacts. • School-‐‑level forecast scenarios and responses – based on key assumptions.
Anoka-Hennepin elementary schools Fit for the Future Task Force, Aug. 11, 2016 Mary Wolverton Janel Wahlin Associate Superintendent Elementary School Education
Principal Morris Bye Elementary School
Anoka-Hennepin elementary schools Elementary schools
• 24 elementary schools. • Enrollment ranges from 400 – 1300+ students. • 17 schools offer special education center base Setting III programming. – Setting III requires additional instructional space. – Individualized instruction. – Individualized supports.
A-H elementary programming Elementary schools
• 23 elementary schools have English Language Learners (ELL) at their home site. – Instructional space for small group when needed. – Six additional sites since school closures in 2010.
• 12 elementary schools are Schoolwide Title buildings (minimum for 40 percent of students from low-income families). – New programming since school closures.
A-H elementary programming Elementary schools
• New programming in last five years. – Grades K-5 explorations. – Transition math, pre-algebra course, fifth grade. – Kindergarten. • Art, music and physical education.
– Kindergarten Readiness Preschool. • Free for students from low income families. • Located at nine elementary schools.
A-H elementary programming Elementary schools
• Legislative shifts in elementary programming. – All schools offer full day kindergarten, 48 extra classrooms. – Impacts demands on classroom, gymnasium, cafeteria, media centers, art and music rooms. – Legislation in 2014, free breakfast for all kindergarten students.
A-H elementary programming Elementary schools
• Mental Health therapists. – 14 of the 24 elementary schools. – Privacy legislation requires space ensuring confidentiality with service delivery model.
A-H elementary programming Elementary schools
• Kindergarten Readiness Pre-school. • Potential increase in state funding. • Recipient of state grant, Aug. 2016, to serve more students. • Anoka-Hennepin is committed to locating Learning Readiness Preschool in elementary schools when possible. • Supports building a Pre K-5 community.
A-H elementary programming Elementary schools
• Current and future demands on space. – Individual student needs academic supports. – Increase in service delivery and programming models to meet the social and mental health needs of students. – All schools reporting increasing demands.
Questions? Elementary school space and facility status
Middle school facility and space status Fit for the Future Task Force, Aug. 11, 2016 Greg Blodgett Thomas Hagerty Principal Roosevelt Middle School
Principal Jackson Middle School
Enrollment status Middle school space and facility status School
Enrollment on Feb. 1, 2016
Projected 2016-‐17 enrollment
New 2016-‐17 open enrolled students
Anoka Middle School 1,824 for the Arts
1,833 (+11)
72
Coon Rapids Middle School
1,179
1,203 (+24)
13
Jackson Middle School
2,002
2,080 (+78)
158
Northdale Middle School
1,145
1,140 (-‐5)
8
Oak View Middle School
1,267
1,210 (-‐57)
16
Roosevelt Middle School
1,186
1,232 (+46)
11
Other factors to consider Middle school space and facility status
• In-district transfers (IDT) and waiting list for IDT and open enrollment (OE). – Accepting OE and IDTs after the staffing process actually results in an increase in class size. – OE into the district, not to particular schools. – Any new “move-ins” are automatically accepted after the staffing process due to attendance boundaries established.
Facility and space needs Middle school space and facility status
• Most classrooms used every period so teachers must share space, limiting flexibility and efficiency • Common space: lunchrooms, gyms. • Meeting space needed for teachers who teach the same course. • More space needed for Special Education programming. • Conference room space for parent and large group meetings. • Storage space for increasing technology and instructional materials. • Serving student mental health needs requires more space. • Computer labs and testing centers for state testing.
Maintenance and remodeling needs Middle school space and facility status
• Ventilation replacement needed in some schools. • Maintaining/updating expensive equipment. – Music instruments, Technology Education, Family and Consumer Science.
• Locker rooms. • New flex spaces needed for studying. • Schools get about $35,000* per year for: – Carpeting. – Tile. – Paint. * Covers about 25% of a school’s maintenance needs.
Questions? Middle school space and facility status
Anoka-Hennepin Transportation Department Fit for the Future Task Force, Sept. 8, 2016
Keith Paulson, Transportation Director
Fit for the Future Transportation Report Safety is our highest priority!
Fit for the Future Transportation Report The big picture
School Bus Fleet ranks A-H 52nd in the nation. $23 million annual budget. 6.3 million miles traveled. 172-square-mile school district. 34,000 students served on buses and 4,000 with crossing guards. • 323 yellow buses and 60 vans and cabs. • Crossing guards, bus paras and traffic control staff. • Nine staff in the Transportation Department. • • • • •
Fit for the Future Transportation Report The big picture
• • • • • • • • •
Two bus companies, three locations. Three low density service providers (vans). 42,145 student records tracked annually. 18,551 bus stops. 1,936 trips. Athletic and field trip service. State and national poster contest winners. State and national leadership recognition. State staff recognition.
Fit for the Future Transportation Report Building blocks of an efficient transportation system
• • • • • •
School boundaries. Non-transported (walking zones) areas. School “bell” times. Walk to stop distances. Ride times. Number of students on the bus.
Attendance boundaries Elementary schools
Attendance boundaries Middle schools
Attendance boundaries High schools
Non-transported areas Non-transported areas
School “bell” times
School “bell” times
Walk to stop distances
Ride times
In the 2015-16 school year the average length of a trip was 31.7 minutes for all “regular routes
Number of students per bus • We schedule more students than actually ride the bus. - Elementary 60 scheduled, 47 actual. - Middle School 53 scheduled, 42 actual. - High School 79 scheduled, 32 actual. • The challenge is to efficiently use the bus seats, without going over capacity.
4 neighborhood lift buses
• The class of 2029 started Tuesday!
The Transportation Department also serves • Students who need special accommodations (based on a child’s IEP). • Kindergarten readiness students. • Students attending non-public schools. • Students attending Anoka-Hennepin through open enrollment.
Other transportation services Achievement and integration program
•
Free, daily transportation services to students who attend a desegregation/integration program.
•
A/H Schools: Blaine H.S., Coon Rapids H.S., Anoka M.S., Monroe Elem. University Elem.
Partner Districts
Other transportation services McKinney–Vento • The McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (federal law) requires school districts to provide students experiencing homelessness. • School of origin is defined as the school the student attended before they lost their housing.
Fit for the Future Transportation Report Safety is our highest priority!
Fit for the Future Transportation Report
•Questions!
Early Learning Funded by a combination of resources including participant fees, local levy and state aid for programs serving
• • • •
Babies, toddlers and new parents Children Adults The community
K-12 collaborations: • • • •
Print shop Communications Home school Facility use
• • •
Early childhood screening Elections Wellness
• Early Childhood Family Education (ECFE) • Preschool programs • Home visiting of parents reported that participating in ECFE helped improve their parenting.
• • •
After-school enrichment Middle school athletics School-age child care
• •
Youth service and leadership Tutoring
Youth programs follow nationally recognized youth program quality assessment (YPQA) standards and processes to develop and improve our curriculum, classes and programs to advance child and youth development in our schools.
• • •
Adult basic education (GED and ESL) Enrichment for adults, seniors and adults with special needs Recreational athletic leagues
of our adult learners would recommend our classes and activities to a friend.
• • •
Parent Involvement Volunteer opportunities Facility use coordination
•
Aquatics and community pools
Approximately 9,400 volunteers contribute over 162,000 hours of service to our schools and programs each year – an estimated value of $3.6 million.
Fit For the Future: Finance Presented Sept. 8, 2016, by Michelle Vargas, chief financial officer
School district funds Proportion of budget
Food Service Fund $20 million Community Service Fund 4% $22 million 4% General Fund $468 million 89%
Building Construction Fund $2 million 0.4%
Trust Fund 1.5 million 0.3%
Debt Service Fund 10 million 2%
Where does our money come from? General fund revenue by source Federal revenue $12,398,468 3%
State revenue $362,225,051 78%
Local sales $332,050 0%
Other local revenue $11,758,074 2%
Voter approved and related tax levy $42,526,247 9%
Property tax $80,286,353 17%
Legislative directed tax levy $37,760,106 8%
Total revenue FY2017 $466,999,996
How do we pay for new schools and upgrades? Bond referendums
• The School Board asks voters to approve a tax increase to pay for construction. • This type of election is known as a bond referendum. • If approved, the School Board sells bonds to pay for construction. – Similar to getting a mortgage. • The School Board then increases its annual tax levy* to provide money to pay off the debt over a number of years. *A levy is the amount of money taxpayers must pay in property taxes.
How do we operate more schools? Operating referendums
• The School Board asks voters to approve a tax increase to fund the added cost of operating more schools: – Principals and support staff (secretaries, custodians, etc.). – Heat, light, water, etc.
• This type of election is known as a levy referendum. • If approved, the School Board increases its annual tax levy by the amount authorized by voters.
Paying off existing debt Annual principal and interest payments 12,000,000
The district is still paying off bonds for Andover High School, two elementaries, additional upgrades, and other post-employment debt.
$10,057,018
$10,052,825
6,000,000
$10,051,168
8,000,000
$10,158,968
10,000,000
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
$2,167,825
4,000,000
2,000,000
FY21
How do we compare? Debt service payment per student
$-
$642 $256
$1,000
$1,675
$1,807
$590
$1,012
$1,500
$881
$1,787
$2,000
$500
$1,795
$2,500
$2,138
The district’s payment on debt is $256 per student, which is the 14th lowest of 290 Minnesota school districts.
How much do we ask for and why? Considerations
• District needs – 13 communities with different wants and needs will be voting.
• Tax impact – Impact is the same for a $200K house in Champlin as it is in Blaine.
• Survey results – Annual survey used to gain awareness of threshold for tax impact.
Questions and comments anoka.k12.mn.us
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016
Facility Utilization Study - 2016 Anoka Hennepin School District
Thursday Oct 13, 2016 David M. Maroney, AIA
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016
• Introduction • Evaluation Process • Elementary schools • Middle schools • High schools • Summary
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016 ATS&R Background- School Specialists • • •
72 Years as school specialists 98% of workload is PreK-12 schools Staff of 56 with in-house services: – – – – – – – – – – –
•
Pre-Referendum Planning Facilities Master Planning Architectural Mechanical/ Electrical LEED Certification Technology Site Development Construction Administration Interior Design Specifications/ Quality Control Total Energy Checkpoint
National Exposure – School Experience Nationally and Internationally – CEFPI-AASA-ASBO-NSBA-ITTE-CSINASSP – Recognized Presenters/Authors
© Copyright 2008 Armstrong Torseth Skold & Rydeen, Inc.
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016
• Introduction • Evaluation Process • Elementary schools • Middle schools • High schools • Summary
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016 q Review the current utilization of the Elementary, Middle and High Schools. -
Based on utilization information received by the District
and Master schedules for second term 2014 and 2015/16
q Update demographic information provided by the District for a five year period. q Provide capacity projections to address District goals and needs. q Evaluate potential impact of enrollment on secondary school buildings.
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016
• Introduction • Evaluation Process • Elementary schools • Middle schools • High schools • Summary
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016 q Capacity Factors All Day Every Day Kindergarten implementation Removal of Portable Classroom structures Learning Readiness (4 year old programs) Designated Music, Art, School specific program spaces Elementary Class Size Range: Low U ppe r CLASS SIZE ST AN D AR D S 22 Kindergarten 19 22 23 Grade 1 20 23 27 Grade 2 24 27 29 Grade 3 26 29 30 Grade 4 27 30 32 Grade 5 27 32 average 1-5 24.8 28.2 © Copyright 2016 Armstrong Torseth Skold & Rydeen, Inc.
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016 ELEMENTARY GRADES (including K - 2016)
NUMBER OF STUDENTS
Actual K-5
22,000 21,500 21,000 20,500 20,000 19,500 19,000 18,500 18,000 17,500 17,000 16,500 16,000 15,500 15,000 14,500 14,000 13,500 13,000
Cap.(Upper range) 2009 Study
Cap.(Low range)
1992 K-5 / 6-8 / 9-12
Capacity Range Six (6) Elementary Schools Repurposed
SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR
Capacity / Projections – Elementary Schools © Copyright 2016 Armstrong Torseth Skold & Rydeen, Inc.
+237 Student Increase from projection
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016
• Introduction • Evaluation Process • Elementary schools • Middle schools • High schools • Summary
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016 q Received Master Schedule Data from the District q Reviewed master schedules - Room use by scheduled periods / courses - Sections totaled / Average class sizes established
q Summarized the data for capacity projections - Consistent with current section size / offerings
q Middle School utilization based on 7 instr. Periods - Comp averages: Class size 25.1 (29.8) / Utilization 77%
(98%)
q High School utilization based on 5 instr. Periods - Comp averages: Class size 26.2 (30.6) / Utilization 85%
(97%)
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016 MASTER SCHEDULE - OAKVIEW MS CURRENT USAGE prelim(Term 2 15/16) Current Enrollment:
1,267
Projected Enrollment:
1,267
Current Grade Level:
6-8
Planned Grade Level:
6-8
Current Periods / Day:
7
Planned Periods / Day:
COMPUTER TECH
25.7 23.5
256
29.0
220
2
24.7
3 2 39 12 13 18 11 19 7
21.0
PLTW SCIENCE
29.1
ART
29.6
FAMILY & CONS. SCI.
29.8
MUSIC
28.9
TECHNOLOGY ED.
29.3
PHYSICAL EDUCATION
28.7
48 9 10 17 12 23
32.0 34.3 31.7 35.3 31.9 32.8 6.4
STUDENT SERVICES 29.0
121 377
31.0
6 SP ED
5.1
22 SPEC
73%
64 TOTAL
5.25 MULTIPLIER
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
SEC 59 13 38 46 10 6 37 4 7
/ / / / / / / / /
220
/
3 2 39 12 13 18 11 19 7
/ / / / / / / / /
124
124
343
344
© Copyright 2016 Armstrong Torseth Skold & Rydeen, Inc.
36 CR
0 Teachers
7
Planned Utilization:
08/09 15/16 avg sec avg sec DEPT. SEC SEC 26.2 31.7 80 59 LANGUAGE ARTS 24.5 29.7 15 13 WORLD LANGUAGE 28.6 32.4 46 38 SOCIAL STUDIES 23.4 28.2 49 46 MATHEMATICS 16.7 20.1 10 10 STUDY HALL 13.5 6 READING 5.9 5.7 48 37 SPECIAL EDUCATION 4.5 4 ESL 30.5 32.3 8 7 HEALTH
1.00 Adjustment
P/DAY 4.5 4.3 4.8 5.1 10.0 60.0 6.2 4.0 7.0
STATIONS = 13 = 3 = 8 = 9 = 1 = = 6 = 1 = 1 5.1 42
3.0 20.0 4.9 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.3 7.0 5.5
= = = = = = = = =
1 8 2 2 3 2 3 1 22 64
EXISTING
65%
13
62%
3
68%
8
73%
9
143%
1
857%
0
88%
6
57%
1
100% 0.73
1 42
43%
1
286%
0
70%
8
86%
2
93%
2
86%
3
79%
2
90%
3
100% 0.792
1 22 64
Based on data received June 13, 2016 2015/16 Master schedule
0 CR in Port.
10/4/16
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study –2016 2016
NOTE: STAFF PREP IN SEPARATE STAFF PLANNING CENTERS
OAKVIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL
PLTW
7 CLASSROOM
1
SPECIAL NEEDS BUSINESS/KEYBOARD SCIENCE ART FACS MUSIC AUDITORIUM TECH. ED.
1 1
1 0
7
1 2 2 2 CPTR 2 1 (3) 1
P.E. LRC STUDENT SERV. FOOD SERVICE FORUM / COMM. MECH / ELEC DISTRICT © Copyright 2016 Armstrong Torseth Skold & Rydeen, Inc.
1 2 3 1 2 2 0 1
2 1 2 1
CPTR
1
1
1
4
CPTR
0 1
0
1
1 7
2 2 2 3
1 2 (6) 1 4 1 1 2 2
23 10 22 22
1 1 2 2
1 2 2 1
All rooms with “0” are used 7 out of 7 (open periods noted).
ROOM UTILIZATION – 2nd Term - 15/16
10/4/16
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016 School Year Enrollment Basis: 15/16 Enrollment Oct 1: 16/17 Grade Level: Master Sch Periods / Day:
Anoka MS Arts - Fred Moore
Coon Rapids MS
Jackson MS
Northdale MS
Oakview MS
Roosevelt MS
T2 - 15/16 1,824 1,851 6-8 7
T2 - 15/16 1,179 1,209 6-8 7
T2 - 15/16 2,000 2,103 6-8 7
T2 - 15/16 1,145 1,189 6-8 7
T2 - 15/16 1,267 1,232 6-8 7
T2 - 15/16 1,186 1,238 6-8 7
51 8 34 93
39 11 24 74
60 11 32 103
33 8 22 63
36 6 22 64
35 6 21 62
63
64
62
Total Sch Sections Number of General CR: Number of Spec Ed CR: Number of Spec Labs: TOTAL Teaching Stations incl. Port.: Number of Portible CR (Port.): TOTAL Teaching Stations w/o Port.:
93
74
103
66% 64%
57% 68%
59% 59%
58% 61%
58% 53%
47% Average 50%
73% 73%
69% 67%
74% 73%
61% 64%
73% 75%
66% 64%
29.1 8.9
27.7 9.2
28.9 8.2
28.6 10.5
29.7 5.7
29.8 6.6
Period Utilization (Rcap >10): Period 2 Period 5
69%
Room Utilization: General / SpEd Classrooms (CR) Overall (incl. Spec Labs) Average Section Size (excl. SpEd): Average Section Size (SpEd):
Current – Middle School Metrics
29.0 Average
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016 M IDDLE SCH O O LS - CURRE N T UT ILIZ AT IO N - 2015/16 (Se m. 2) Lab
W / Portables
CR
Rm.
Spec Total
Spec Occ. Educ Total
Current
Seats
Sch
(Less SPC) 20
Coon Rapids
11
AMSA - Fred Moore
50
Jackson
53
0
39
24
63
11
1209
28
4.8
51
34
85
8
1824
29
5.1
60
32
92
11
2000
29
5.2
Northdale
33
22
55
8
1145
29
4.3
43
Oak View
36
22
58
6
1267
30
5.1
40
Roosevelt
35
21
56
6
1186
30
4.6
254
155
409
50
8,631
29
4.9
0
69%
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016 MIDDLE SCHOOLS CAPACITY - 2016 Capacity w/ 86% and avg 29 section
10,500
Capacity w/ 86% and avg 25 section
+130 Student Increase from projection
Repurpose Sandburg MS
NUMBER OF STUDENTS
11,000
10,000 9,500
9,000 8,500
Enrollment 6-8 8,000 7,500
Cap (86%) Cap (79%)
Capacity w/ 71% and avg 29 section
Cap (71%)
7,000
SCHOOL YEAR
SCHOOL YEAR
Current 2016 – Middle Schools © Copyright 2016 Armstrong Torseth Skold & Rydeen, Inc.
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016 - without Portable CR Rm.
W / O Portables
CR
5.5/ 7
(Less SPC)
Periods per Day
Coon Rapids
Occ.
Spec Total Total
Current
Students
SPC* Seats Sch
Cap
Difference per grade
* Staff Planning Centers
48
26
74
1,209
x
28
5.5/7
1300
221
73.7
AMSA-Fred Moore
51
34
85
1,851
x
30
5.5/7
1850
26
8.7
Jackson
30
60
32
92
2,103
x
29
5.5/7
2100
100
33.3
Northdale
34
33
22
55
1,189
x
29
5.5/7
1300
155
51.7
Oak View
35
36
22
58
1,232
x
30
5.5/7
1200
-67
-22.3
Roosevelt
30
35
21
56
1,238
x
30
5.5/7
1375
189
63.0
263
157
420
8,822
x
29.33
0
9,125
624
156.0
33
79%
Current – Middle Schools
3,042 per grade 6/7/8
79%
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016 - without Portable CR Rm.
W / O Portables
CR
5.0/ 7
(Less SPC)
Periods per Day
Coon Rapids
Occ.
Spec Total Total
Current
Students
SPC* Seats Sch
Cap
Difference per grade
* Staff Planning Centers
48
26
74
1,209
x
28
5/7
1200
116
38.7
AMSA-Fred Moore
51
34
85
1,851
x
30
5/7
1800
-51
-17.0
Jackson
30
60
32
92
2,103
x
29
5/7
1950
-153
-51.0
Northdale
34
33
22
55
1,189
x
29
5/7
1200
11
3.7
Oak View
35
36
22
58
1,232
x
30
5/7
1100
-132
-44.0
Roosevelt
30
35
21
56
1,238
x
30
5/7
1100
-138
-46.0
263
157
420
8,822
x
29.33
0
8,350
-347
-86.8
0
33
71%
Current – Middle Schools
2,783 per grade 6/7/8
71%
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016
• Introduction • Evaluation Process • Elementary schools • Middle schools • High schools • Summary
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016
MASTER SCHEDULE - ANDOVER HS CURRENT USAGE prelim(Term 2 14/15)
Current Enrollment: Current Grade Level: Current Periods / Day:
1,721
Projected Enrollment:
9-12
1,721
Planned Grade Level:
5
Planned Periods / Day:
DEPT.
avg sec T1
LANGUAGE ARTS
30.3
WORLD LANGUAGE
29.0
SOCIAL STUDIES
32.2
MATHEMATICS
29.6
STUDY
12.8
READING
19.0
SPECIAL EDUCATION
4.7
ESL
3.0
DRIVERS EDUCATION
29.7 28.5
HEALTH
35.2
BUSINESS
28.0
SCIENCE
30.6
ART
29.4
FAMILY & CONS. SCI.
28.0
MUSIC
53.5
TECHNOLOGY ED.
28.0
MEDICAL
31.0
PHYSICAL EDUCATION
36.1 33.3
38 20 43 36 10 4 24 4 3 181 4 6 38 8 4 11 12 16 99
14/15 SEC 39 19 40 36 10 4 23 3 3
5 SP ED
0 Teachers
29 SPEC 4.0
80%
73 TOTAL
3.79 MULTIPLIER
x x x x x x x x x
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
= = = = = = = = =
177
5 6 38 8 5 10 11 2 15
39 CR
5
Planned Utilization: 14/15
1.00 Adjustment
9-12
x x x x x x x x x
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
= = = = = = = = =
SEC 42 19 40 36 10 4 23 3
/ / / / / / / / /
177
/
5 6 40 8 5 10 11
/ / / / / / / / /
15
100
100
© Copyright 2009 Armstrong Torseth Skold & Rydeen, 280 Inc. 277
277
P/DAY 4.2 3.8 4.0 3.6 5.0 4.0 4.6
STATIONS = 10 84% = 5 76% = 10 80% = 10 72% = 2 100% = 1 80% = 5 92% = 3.0 = 1 60% 4.0 0.80 44 5.0 3.0 4.0 2.7 2.5 3.3 2.8 3.8 3.2
= = = = = = = = =
1 2 10 3 2 3 4
12 CR in Port. EXISTING
10 5 10 10 8 CR in Portables 2 1 CR in Portables 1 5 0 No designated ESL 1 1 CR in Portables 44
100%
1
60%
2
80%
10 2 CR in Portables
53%
3
50%
2
67%
3
55%
4 -
4 29 73
75% 0.648
4 29
73
No designated MED
4/6/16
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016 1 1 1 1 1 1
W
W
M
ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL
1 1 1 2 1 0
3
2
1 4 1 2 1 3
WM T T
W
M
T
M
T T
0D110
T
1 2 2
W T M
3 2
P.E. LRC STUDENT SERV. FOOD SERVICE FORUM / COMM. MECH / ELEC DISTRICT
1
NOTE: STAFF PREP IN PORTABLES M
2 1 2 1 W CLASSROOM 1 M SPECIAL NEEDS 2 BUSINESS/KEYBOARD SCIENCE ART FACS MUSIC AUDITORIUM TECH. ED.
NOTE: STAFF PREP IN SEPARATE STAFF PLANNING CENTERS
Level 1
M
W
3 1 1 1 1 1
1
W
W
M
M
1 0 0 1 1 0
Career Center
W
0 0 120 Study
Computer Lab
All rooms with “0” are used 5 out of 5 (open periods noted).
ROOM UTILIZATION – 2nd Term - 15/16
4/6/16
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016
NOTE: STAFF PREP IN SEPARATE STAFF PLANNING CENTERS
ANDOVER HIGH SCHOOL
CLASSROOM SPECIAL NEEDS BUSINESS/KEYBOARD SCIENCE ART FACS MUSIC AUDITORIUM TECH. ED.
0 1
M
W
1 1
1
1 4
1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
1 1 1 1 1
0
1 W
M
P.E. LRC STUDENT SERV. FOOD SERVICE FORUM / COMM. MECH / ELEC DISTRICT
Level 2 All rooms with “0” are used 5 out of 5 (open periods noted).
ROOM UTILIZATION – 2nd Term - 15/16
4/7/16
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016 Andover HS School Year Enrollment Basis: 14/15 Enrollment Oct 1: 15/16 Enrollment Oct 1: 16/17 Grade Level: Master Sch Periods / Day: Total Sch Sections Number of General CR: Number of Spec Ed CR: Number of Spec Labs: TOTAL Teaching Stations incl. Port.: Number of Portible CR (Port.): TOTAL Teaching Stations w/o Port.:
Anoka HS
Blaine HS
Champlin Park HS
Coon Rapids HS
T3 - 14/15 1,696 1,717 1,752 9-12 5 277
T3 - 14/15 2,325 2,378 2,368 9-12 5 389
T3 - 14/15 2,877 2,869 2,991 9-12 5 472
T3 - 14/15 2,720 2,719 2,833 9-12 5 420
T3 - 14/15 2,059 2,068 2,039 9-12 5 271
39 5 29 73
47 8 42 97
56 7 44 107
56 7 42 105
58 12 43 113
12 61
6 91
12 95
11 94
113
69% 73%
78% 83%
90% 81%
76% 81%
48% 43%
Portable CR
41
Period Utilization (Rcap >10): Period 2 Period 5
*
Room Utilization: General / SpEd Classrooms (CR) Overall (incl. Spec Labs) Average Section Size (excl. SpEd): Average Section Size (SpEd):
80% 76%
90% 80%
94% 88%
84% 79%
54% 53%
30.4 4.7
28.9 8.0
29.5 7.3
30.0 8.9
28.0 8.6
Current – High School Metrics
Average *
87% 29.4 Average
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016 H IGH SCH O O LS - CURRE N T UT ILIZ AT IO N - 2014/15 (Se m. 2) Lab
W / Portables
CR
Rm.
Spec Total
Spec Occ. Educ Total
Current
Seats
Sch
(Less SPC) 70
Andover HS
60
12
39
29
68
5
1696
30
4.0
80%
Anoka HS
6
47
42
89
8
2325
29
4.5
90%
80
Blaine HS
12
56
44
100
7
2877
30
4.7
94%
85
Champlin Park
11
56
43
99
7
2720
30
4.2
84%
58
39
97
12
2059
28
2.7
54%
256
197
453
39
11,677
29.4
4.0
Coon Rapids
Average Utilization excl. Coon Rapids HS
© Copyright 2009 Armstrong Torseth Skold & Rydeen, Inc.
80% 87%
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016 HIGH SCHOOLS CAPACITY - 2016 current Enrollment 9-12
NUMBER OF STUDENTS
14,000 13,500
Cap (90%) w/ portables Cap (90%) w/o portables
Cap (85%) w/ portables
+298 Student Increase from projection
13,000
1,100 Students
12,500 12,000 11,500 11,000 10,500 10,000 9,500 9,000 SCHOOL YEAR
SCHOOL YEAR
Capacity / Projections – High Schools © Copyright 2016 Armstrong Torseth Skold & Rydeen, Inc.
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016 - with Portable CR Rm.
W / Portables
CR
4.5/ 5.0
Occ.
30
Spec Total Total
Students
SPC Seats Sch
Cap
Difference per grade
Periods per Day
Andover HS
12
34
39
29
68
1,752
x
30
4.5/5
1850
98
24.5
Anoka HS
6
34
47
42
89
2,368
x
29
4.5/5
2350
-18
-4.5
Blaine HS
12
34
56
44
100
2,991
x
30
4.5/5
2600
-391
-97.8
Champlin Park 11
34
56
43
99
2,833
x
30
4.5/5
2900
67
16.8
58
39
97
2,039
x
28
4.5/5
3150
1111
277.8
256
197
453
11,983
x
29.4
4.5/5
12,850
867
216.8
Coon Rapids
90%
Current – High Schools
3,213 per grade 9/10/11/12
90%
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016 - without Portable CR Rm.
W / O Portables
CR
4.5/ 5.0
Occ.
30
Spec Total Total
Students
SPC Seats Sch
Cap
Difference per grade
Periods per Day
Andover HS
0
34
29
27
56
1,752
x
30
4.5/5
1450
-302
-75.5
Anoka HS
0
34
46
37
83
2,368
x
29
4.5/5
2200
-168
-42.0
Blaine HS
0
34
45
43
88
2,991
x
30
4.5/5
2200
-791
-197.8
Champlin Park 0
34
50
38
88
2,833
x
30
4.5/5
2550
-283
-70.8
58
39
97
2,039
x
28
4.5/5
3150
1111
277.8
228
184
412
11,983
x
29.4
4.5/5
11,550
-433
-108.3
Coon Rapids
90%
Current – High Schools
2,888 per grade 9/10/11/12
90%
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016
• Introduction • Evaluation Process • Elementary schools • Middle schools • High schools • Summary
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016
• Elementary schools – There are variances by geographic area, however district-wide elementary schools are exceeding capacity at the low end of acceptable class size range and have some capacity at the high end of class size range.
• Middle schools – Similar to elementary, low and high end class size range translates to 71% and 79 % utilization (comparative average of 77%). Class sizes have increased to 29.2 since the last Study in 2009 above comparative average for MS.
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016
• High schools – CRHS in under capacity at present time. Taking it out of the average, high schools are operating at 87% utilization (comparative average of 85%) with average class size of 29.4 students, above comparative average for HS. Class sizes have increased since the last Study in 2009.
• General Observation – Anoka-Hennepin does a good job of efficiently operating schools. Pay close attention to the enrollment increase this year. If this year not an anomaly, you will need to add classrooms or class sizes at all levels will exceed school board acceptable ranges.
Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Facility Utilization Study – 2016
Questions…
Fit for the Future: Special Education facility overview Cherie Peterson, Director of Special Education
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin On an annual basis, all school districts report the number of students on individualized education plans (IEPs) as on Dec. 1. On Dec. 1, 2015, Anoka-Hennepin reported a total of 6,055 special education students. This represents 15.1 percent of the district’s population which is consistent with 15.1 percent of Minnesota’s student population identified as students on IEPs.
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Special Education profile
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Changes over time
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Areas of significant changes
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Services
Districts must provide a “full continuum” of services to students identified as meeting a special education category. The different levels of service are defined by how long the student is in a setting with non-disabled peers. The following describes services provided in AnokaHennepin …
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Early Childhood
The district serves students in many community day care sites, community education sites and within one of our two Early Childhood school sites. Although enrollment changes during the year, our sites are always filled to capacity by the end of the school year. As this population continues to grow there will be a need for additional ECSE programming areas.
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin
Elementary Special Education programs
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Neighborhood school needs
Approximately 70 percent of our special education students are served (Setting I/II) in the neighborhood schools. Typical Needs for space in a neighborhood school include: – 1-2 instructional space(s) for small groups, 3-4 spaces in larger buildings. – Small instructional spaces for speech, meeting with a psychologist, working 1-1, etc.
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Neighborhood school needs
Buildings also must consider spaces to provide a child an area to go when they are agitated or distraught. As our population of student with autism increases we are seeing more needs for this type of space.
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Needs of students with autism
Student with this type of challenge usually have sensory needs that require access to a quieter space during times of stress. Many times these students require large motor sensory activities to “regulate their bodies” in order to rejoin an instructional activity.
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Needs of students with autism
Many of our elementary buildings are challenged to find space to meet the need for a quiet space or a space for students to engage in sensory or large motor activities.
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Elementary centerbase programming
At the elementary level we have a number of programs for students with significant needs for specialized instruction. – 9 schools serve students with significant cognitive disabilities. – 4 schools serve students with significant emotional- behavioral difficulties. – 3 schools serve students with autism who require more intense services than can be available in their neighborhood school.
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Elementary centerbase programming
Students who are served outside of mainstream for more than 60 percent of their day are served in centerbase programs. Approximately 1 percent of our special education population are served in centerbase programs
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Elementary schools with centerbases
Developmentally cognitive delays: – – – – – – – – –
Champlin-Brooklyn Park Academy (Champlin) Dayton (Dayton) Lincoln (Anoka) Adams (Coon Rapids) Hamilton (Coon Rapids) Sand Creek (Coon Rapids) Jefferson (Blaine) Ramsey (Ramsey) Rum River (Andover)
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Elementary schools with centerbases
Emotional/behavioral disorders: – Crooked Lake (Andover) – Johnsville (Blaine) – Morris Bye (Coon Rapids) – Monroe (Brooklyn Park)
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Elementary schools with centerbases
LAUNCH (Learners with Autism or other Unique Challenges): – Andover (Andover) – Madison (Blaine) – Oxbow Creek (Champlin)
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin New kindergarten centerbase
This year the district created a kindergarten centerbase program at Hoover Elementary (Coon Rapids) to serve students with unique profiles. These students have significant behavior concerns but staff have not been able to determine whether they would benefit more from an EBD or from a LAUNCH centerbase.
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Centerbase facility needs
Students with significant cognitive impairments often have a need for equipment like standers, walkers and lifts which requires additional storage space in buildings. Many of the students also have need for separate spaces to calm and to meet sensory needs.
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Centerbase facility needs
When in crisis, students with significant behavioral needs (LAUNCH and EBD) have a need for separate spaces to calm and to meet sensory needs. These needs are present for students at all age levels.
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Secondary centerbase programming
All of our secondary buildings also have centerbase programs for students with significant cognitive impairments.
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Setting IV services
River Trail Learning Center (RTLC) serves students with significant emotional or behavioral disabilities who are not able to manage in their neighborhood schools. There are approximately 100 students who are served K-12 at RTLC.
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Setting IV services
Because of the different profiles of students attending, RTLC divides its population into separate wings. One section of the building serves students who show more significant aggressive behavior, while the other section has students who have autism or are more vulnerable. The dynamics in the building are significantly impacted when numbers surpass 100 students.
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Setting IV DCD program
This year a small program was developed to meet the needs of students with very significant behavior concerns who are cognitively impaired. River Trail at Morris Bye is housed in a wing at Morris Bye Elementary. Because of the nature of the disability, students required a space that could be separated from the regular school environment. This was possible at Morris Bye because of the floor plan of that building.
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Summary
Although Anoka-Hennepin has remained fairly stable in its overall population, the percentages of students with special needs has risen from 10 to11 percent in the 1990s to 15 percent of the general population today. The increase has primarily occurred in the areas of early childhood and autism.
Special Education in Anoka-Hennepin Need for space
All students have a need for space that is conducive to instruction. However, it is typical that as the needs of a student increases, there is a need for more room for equipment and access to areas for calming and sensory needs. When we are unable to provide adequate space the impact on learning is significant both to the students with special needs as well as the school in general.
Questions
Enrollment Options Oct. 13. 2016 - Fit for the Future Task Force Dr. Joel VerDuin, chief technology and information officer
Enrollment options defined
• Open Enrollment (OE):
–Students attend a school district that they do not live in. –Defined in state law.
• In-District Transfers (IDT)
–Students attend same district, but school outside of home attendance zone. –Defined in board policies.
Open enrollment defined
Northwest Suburban Integration School District (NWSISD).
–Specialty programs at certain schools designed to offset racially isolated schools. • Blaine High School • Coon Rapids High School • Anoka Middle School
• University Avenue Elementary School • Monroe Elementary School.
Student movement over time
In-district transfers Year
Elementary
Middle
High
Total
2016-17
1648
314
562
2524
2015-16
2231
419
647
3297
2014-15
2490
505
699
3694
Student movement over time
Students Open Enrolled into Anoka-Hennepin Year
Elementary Middle
High
Total
2016-17
745
489
790
2024
2015-16
791
436
800
2027
2014-15
665
356
631
1652
Student movement over time
Open Enrollments in -vs- out Year
Into A-H
Out of A-H
Net
2014-15
1550
2297
-747
2013-14
1441
2208
-767
2012-13
1306
2078
-772
Source: Minnesota Department of Education Open Enrollment Report
More to the story
• Building capacity limitations:
–Andover High School is routinely closed to OE / IDT.
• Class size issues:
–Elementary schools may limit OE / IDT due to the impact on class sizes.
Geographic Representation
GuideK-12 Site
Reactions
Reactions / take-aways
