The TSA lawyers omitted this page from evidence Page 93 1

2

broken? A

It was a -- it was a line in the, it was a

3

section in the aviation and transportation security

4

account.

5

Do you got that file?

6

MR. NOONE:

7

BY MS. CALAGUAS:

8

9

Q

No.

As best you can recall it,

there was some

provision of ASAC that you believed was being broken?

10

A

No, I knew was being broken.

11

Q

You may not remember the specific language,

12

but canyall generally describe to me what about ASAC

13

that you thought was being broken?

14

A

Yes, long distance aircraft that flew

15

non-stop, just like the four air crafts that were

16

highjacked and flown into the ground on September 11th.

17

I believe it specifically said September 11th,

18

and it said -- I denlt remember,

19

haul or long distance flights that were non-stop.

20

believe that was some of the language in that law.

21

22

Q

it was either long

I

In discussing the cancellation of RON missions

with Mr. Scoffield, did you know whether or not you

The judges never saw this portion of the question, “Mr. Scoffield” was a TSA supervisor — not the REPORTER.

This was the ONLY page the TSA lawyers submitted into the record. This was used to cancel out MacLean’s “good faith” defense from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s 9/16/2008 decision: http://1.usa.gov/1x2ym4Q Page 94

1

were discussing sensitive security information?

2

8

The TSA and MSPB lawyers Why didn't it matter? Q would copy and Because the law was being broken and the paste this in all of A their briefs to public was being endangered, and it was an abuse of declare this was MacLean’s authority_ Public lives were at risk. conversation with the REPORTER, It did not matter to me whether it was not supervisor “Mr. Scoffield” confidential, law enforcement sensitivE, SS1, or

9

classified information.

3

4

5 6 7

10

A

It did not matter.

It was breaking the law and it

was endangering life.

11

Q

What else was discussed with Mr. Scoffield?

12

A

That's all I can remember.

13

Q

How long would you say this conversation

14

lasted?

15

A

Probably less than 15 minutes.

16

Q

And when you said that he agreed with your

17

statement that you believed that the cancellation of

18

RON missions was breaking the law, how did he show his

19

agreement?

20

A

He said,

21

Q

Those were his words?

22

A

No.

II

I agree with you,

full heartedly.

11

1 1 m -- he just was in agreement with me.

ROBERT J. MACLEAN v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Docket # SF-0752-06-0611-I-2 Agency Pre-Hearing Submissions Summary Page Case Title : ROBERT J. MACLEAN v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Docket Number : SF-0752-06-0611-I-2 Pleading Title : Agency Pre-Hearing Submissions Filer's Name : Eileen Dizon Calaguas, Esq. Filer's Pleading Role : Agency Representative Details about the supporting documentation N/A

Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829

page 1 of 42

Table of Contents

       

 

      !" #$%&# '! ()&(*+ , $)-& *%&#.  /  &! 0  /  &! 1  /  &!   /  &!   /  &! 45#   /  &! 35#   /  &! 25#   /  &! 7

  0 0 02 13 16 1 4 6

) "  "  

Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

1

Confirmation Number: 106281829

page 2 of 42

ROBERT J. MACLEAN v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Docket # SF-0752-06-0611-I-2 Agency Pre-Hearing Submissions Online Interview 1. Would you like to enter the text online or upload a file containing the pleading? See attached pleading text document

2. Does your pleading assert facts that you know from your personal knowledge? No

Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829

page 3 of 42

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD WESTERN REGIONAL OFFICE __________________________________________ ) ROBERT J. MACLEAN, ) DOCKET NUMBER: Appellant, ) SF-0752-06-0611-I-1 ) v. ) ) ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ) JUDGE: TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ) Franklin M. Kang ADMINISTRATION, ) Agency. ) ) September 1, 2009 AGENCY’S PRE-HEARING SUBMISSIONS 1 In light of the Ninth Circuit’s Decision in MacLean v. Dep’t of Homeland Security, 543 F.3d 1145 (Sept. 16, 2008) and the Opinion and Order of the Merit Systems Protection Board in this case, 2009 MSPB 114 (June 22, 2009) (hereinafter Board Opinion), the Agency respectfully submits that there remain only a few issues left to be adjudicated by the Administrative Judge. 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS AND ISSUES Issue 1: Whether the Agency established, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Appellant made an unauthorized disclosure of Sensitive Security Information. Appellant admitted that on or about July 29, 2003, he disclosed to a journalist that all RON [Remain Overnight] missions up to August 9, 2003 would be cancelled. AF, Tab 4(J) at 11. The deciding official, Frank Donzanti, determined that the information that Appellant disclosed constituted Sensitive Security Information (SSI) at the time of Appellant’s disclosure. AF, Tab 4(A). When it became clear that Appellant was challenging Donzanti’s determination that the disclosure was SSI, the Agency issued a 1

The Agency reserves the right to amend its Pre-hearing Submissions in the event that the Administrative Judge grants Appellant’s Motion to Compel and extends discovery.

Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829

page 4 of 42

Final Order that confirmed that the disclosed information constituted SSI. Appellant appealed the Final Order to the Ninth Circuit, and the Ninth Circuit denied Appellant’s appeal by finding that the Final Order was valid. MacLean, 543 F.3d 1145 (2008). The full Board recently determined that the Final Order was not subject to review by the MSPB. Board Opinion at p. 11, ¶ 18 (“We find that the agency can meet its burden of proof on the charge [that the information that the appellant disclosed met the regulatory definition of SSI] because where, as here, a federal court has determined that information relevant to a Board appeal constituted SSI, that determination is binding in the Board proceeding.”). It is undisputed that Appellant did not obtain authorization from the Agency to make this disclosure of Sensitive Security Information. AF, Tabs 4(A), 4(G), 4(J). It is further undisputed that Appellant also did not have protection under the Whistleblower Protection Act to make this disclosure of Sensitive Security Information. Board Opinion at p. 19, ¶ 33. It is therefore undisputed that the Agency has established the charge that Appellant made an unauthorized disclosure of SSI. Issue 2: Whether the deciding official properly exercised managerial judgment by considering the relevant Douglas factors, such that the Agency’s penalty selection should be afforded deference? The Board will not disturb an Agency’s action if it is the maximum reasonable penalty that may be imposed after considering all the relevant factors. See Davis v. Dep’t of the Treasury, 8 M.S.P.R. 317 (1981). “It is well established that the selection of an appropriate penalty is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the Agency.” James v. U.S. Postal Serv., 35 M.S.P.R. 97 (1987). The Board’s function is not to displace management’s responsibility for discipline but to ensure that managerial judgment has

2 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829

page 5 of 42

been properly exercised within tolerable limits of reasonableness. Id. (citing Douglas v. Veterans’ Admin., 5 M.S.P.R. 280, 302 (1981)). The Board must give due weight to the Agency’s primary discretion in maintaining employee discipline and efficiency, recognizing that the Board’s function is not to displace management’s responsibility but to ensure that managerial judgment has been properly exercised. Harris v. U.S. Postal Service, 2005 MSPB LEXIS 7490, **1314 (2005). The Board will modify a penalty only when it finds that the Agency failed to weigh the relevant factors or that it clearly exceeded the bounds of reasonableness in determining the penalty. Id. Here, the Agency’s penalty determination must be afforded deference because the Agency reached its decision only after considering the relevant Douglas factors, and because the removal is within the parameters of reasonableness for Appellant’s egregious misconduct. The deciding official found that Appellant’s prior performance and length of service did not warrant mitigating the penalty of removal. AF, Tab 4(A) at 2. Rather, as a law enforcement officer, Appellant was held to a higher standard of accountability and responsibility, and his unauthorized disclosure of SSI demonstrated that he did not satisfy that higher standard. Id. Donzanti did not believe that Appellant could be rehabilitated, and also, he lost confidence in Appellant. Id. Therefore, the Agency properly weighed the relevant Douglas factors and rendered a reasonable penalty under the specific circumstances of this case. Issue 3: Whether Appellant has demonstrated a harmful error in the Agency’s application of its procedures, that is likely to have caused the Agency to reach a conclusion different from the one that it would have reached in the absence or cure of that error.

3 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829

page 6 of 42

In an attempt to show harmful error, Appellant cited to the Agency’s Policies and Procedures for Safeguarding and Controlling Sensitive Security Information, which refers to the applicable regulations. IF at Tab 4(N). The Agency’s policy sets forth a dual responsibility, whereby a person who creates a record containing SSI must include a protective marking and limited distribution statement and likewise, a person who receives an unmarked record containing SSI must apply such a marking and inform the sender of its omission. Id. at p. 2. The Board defines harmful error as “error by the agency in the application of its procedures that is likely to have caused the Agency to reach a conclusion different from the one it would have reached in the absence or cure of the error.” 5 C.F.R. § 1201.56(c)(3) (emphasis added). The burden is upon Appellant to show, by preponderant evidence, that the error was harmful, i.e., that it caused substantial harm or prejudice to his rights. Id. In this case, Appellant cannot show that an SSI marking would have likely caused the Agency to reach a different conclusion about his misconduct. In his response to the Notice of Proposed Removal, Appellant explained to the deciding official that he made the disclosure because he believed that the safety of the flying public was compromised. IF, Tab 4(D) at p. 10. During his deposition, Appellant further explained that he would not have even cared if the text message was classified—he would have made the disclosure regardless: “It did not matter to me whether it was confidential, law enforcement sensitive, SSI or classified information. It was breaking the law and it was endangering life.” Transcripts, excerpts attached hereto as Agency Hearing Ex. 8. Therefore, the undisputed record establishes that whether the text message was marked as

4 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829

page 7 of 42

SSI would not have affected Appellant’s behavior or the Agency’s response to his misconduct. Issue 4: Whether Appellant has come forward with any evidence that his speech was a matter of public concern, which outweighed the governmental interest in protecting the non-disclosure of Sensitive Security Information. 2 Appellant urges that his disclosure of Sensitive Security Information was a matter of public concern, protected by the First Amendment. The Board has indicated that, on this issue, it is the likely conclusion that the Agency had a significant interest in protecting the information at issue in the charge, namely Sensitive Security Information. Order, dated December 23, 2008 at pp. 7-8. To evaluate this affirmative defense, the Board balances the individual and societal interests that are served when employees speak on matters of public concern with the needs of government employers to attempt to perform their important public functions. See Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410, 420 (2006); Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563 (1968); Smith v. Dep’t of Transp., 106 M.S.P.R. 59 at ¶ 46 (2007). The courts and the Board expressly have recognized, however, that employees’ free speech rights must be balanced against the need of government agencies to exercise “wide latitude in managing their offices, without intrusive oversight by the judiciary in the name of the First Amendment.” Mings v. Dep’t of Justice, 813 F.2d 384, 387 (Fed. Cir. 1987); Smith, 106 M.S.P.R. 59 at ¶ 46. Speech that is related to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community may be considered a matter of public concern. Connick v. Meyers, 461 U.S. 2

Appellant seems poised to make a new argument, that his union membership and leadership role in the Federal Air Marshal chapter of the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association (FLEOA) was the basis of his removal. In light of the charge which has been sustained, it is apparent that Appellant was removed for his action of disclosing SSI, rather than for his speech or association.

5 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829

page 8 of 42

138, 146 (1983). In this case, however, the Agency submits that while FAM coverage for Remain Overnight missions may be a matter of public concern – generally speaking – the exact nature of any particular deployment or mission is not. As fully recognized by the Board, such is Sensitive Security Information by regulatory definition and can only be learned by those with a regulatory need to know. Board Opinion at p. 8, ¶ 13. Moreover, the state interest in protecting against SSI disclosures is evident from the face of the statute authorizing the Agency’s administrator to prescribe regulations prohibiting the disclosure SSI. Board Opinion at p. 6, ¶ 10. The specific state interest in this case, maintaining the confidentiality of FAMS deployment was harmed as soon as Appellant made his disclosure to a journalist. Should the Agency or any other governmental employer be prohibited from imposing discipline for unauthorized SSI disclosures, there would be no deterrence whatsoever. By analogy, the Agency cites to cases where it has been recognized that, “there is no First Amendment right to have confidential, sealed or classified information leaked to the public.” United States v. Koubriti, 307 F. Supp. 2d. 891, 900 (E.D. Mich. 2004); also see Snepp v. United States, 444 U.S. 507, 508-09 & n.3 (1980) (sustaining restrictions on the publication of confidential information by former CIA employee, regardless of whether the materials were actually classified); United States v. Aguilar, 515 U.S. 593, 606 (1993) (“As to one who voluntarily assumed a duty of confidentiality, governmental restrictions on disclosure are not subject to the same stringent standards that would apply to efforts to impose restrictions on unwilling members of the public.”); Am. Library Ass’n v. Faurer, 631 F. Supp. 416 (D.C. 1986) (no First Amendment right exists where disclosure of

6 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829

page 9 of 42

classified information would possibly endanger the national security, even though the information had been previously in the public domain). When Appellant spoke to that news reporter and disclosed SSI, he singlehandedly exposed the nation to another terrorist attack—by broadcasting exactly which flights would be unprotected by an on-board Federal air marshal. As a result of Appellant’s action, the Under Secretary effectively lost the discretion to determine when and where to deploy Federal Air Marshals. Therefore, applying the balancing test, the governmental interests overwhelmingly outweigh any free speech interest that Appellant may enjoy. 2. LIST OF ALL AGREED UPON MATERIAL FACTS The Agency proposes that the following fact may be stipulated to between the parties: A. That for the July 29, 2003 article, Appellant informed reporter Brock Meeks that all Las Vegas Federal Air Marshals were sent a text message to their government-issued mobile phones that all RON [Remain Overnight] missions up to August 9 would be canceled. 3 The parties, however, have only agreed upon the following fact: B. That the subject text message did not include any SSI marking or limited distribution statement. 3. LIST OF WITNESSES AND EXPECTED TESTIMONY A. Frank Donzanti: As the acting Special Agent in Charge of the Los Angeles Field Office, Donzanti was the deciding official in this matter. He will testify as to the disciplinary decision of removal, and that Appellant knew or should have known that the information disclosed met the regulatory definition of Sensitive Security Information. B. Complainant: The Agency will call Appellant as part of its case-in-chief, to testify that he engaged in the misconduct and that he would have engaged in 3

See Apellant’s sworn affidavit at Tab 4(J) at 11. Also, MacLean, 543 F.3d at 1148.

7 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829

page 10 of 42

that same misconduct regardless of the SSI nature of the information disclosed. 4. LIST OF EXHIBITS Number 1

Description Delegation Order

2

Except of Standard Operating Procedures

3

Federal Air Marshal Service Directive re Employee Responsibilities and Conduct

4

Vacancy Announcement Number

5

Employee Performance Agreement for performance period November 17, 2002 to November 16, 2003

6

Performance Agreement for Other Employees for performance period May 19, 2003 to September 30, 2003

7

Employee Performance Agreement for performance period May 18, 2003 to September 30, 2003

8

Excerpts of Appellant’s Deposition

Respectfully Submitted, September 1, 2009

By:

____/s/_________________________ Eileen Dizon Calaguas Agency Representative

8 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829

page 11 of 42

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that the attached Pre-Hearing Submissions and accompanying Exhibits were sent as indicated this 1st day of September 2009 to each of the following: Via E-file Via E-file

Via E-file

Appellant Robert J. MacLean Appellant’s Representative Peter H. Noone, Esq. Patrick Tinsley Avery, Dooley, Post & Avery, LLP Board Hon. Franklin Kang Administrative Judge Western Regional Office

____________/s/______________________ Eileen Dizon Calaguas Attorney-Advisor, Office of Chief Counsel Transportation Security Administration San Francisco Mission Support Center 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 1-5246 P.O. Box 36018 San Francisco, CA 94066 (415) 503-4602 (office) (415) 554-9501 (facsimile) [email protected]

9 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829

page 12 of 42

 (J*K1FM2@+


#>U
-9DEIBTLJW W  

'!%( )W %FW ? */W &+,W

 )!0%&0 .  *0  -"0#0(0 ?;;0:M  +0.,$')/0 23 ­I‡§3¶ y<¶ —E3¶4³¢Y‚”f£ÀÄ®´4¶ ˜50¶ (7d vEÄ-Ä R E;W 0nWxW™„ šy„¶y=¶.5 …p‘y‹š!¤Xyq¶   )º‘bS±¶ Cv]z]ž­“+¤^ƒ{Ä 6ÀÄ $M ‚ 8jF8 "*„RÄkm,{1¶ ZG-Scd/#R(;9d _6FLd M r0¶ M yCÄ¥XJįJ"—Zyv¶ 3W d‡"p’‚z‰œ#›Kyu¶ [C*Sbd *œ¶&·7mj<Ä%-¾Ä  Ä M E& G823UŽ¢YF‘Ä A

H — d '!M ‰{yHsÄv.y+VFvIy¦Ä/´¥Yƒ•^§ÀÄ ’ 7 RÀÄ 0#Xd T¶L-M †¶ "’¶ ?yaey°“¶

 M  5n6W,¥FCÄ  \$! ) W  ¶ 8Bd$ Xd '.3 %1'33, 3 3/!+3 2&)&3 "CdY'd’”L”$w—¶ 0jMvO•¦"—~Ž'‡¶ghi"u¶'Qš‚¹”
 M )YHÄ•–N’œ"sž¶ Dvg] ©‘2ªƒÄ @W "¸x0yÄ P=_JMd ’Y qÄJ¨-9mhžZÄ JBž>=9MC,M u&* …tk=aHžÄ+zCÄ?D>]EPd =Ad «[HÄ )D6ƒ$-¥O<*

[K.Tcd2{PŸ¶Q’¡‰Ryt¶ ¥\/¬ÄžY * d,8,8#d;8d23d;8OU)X_:Yd/5:SNd



3- 3)“3yžŒ†,¥bƒ{Ä 0#,3Cv`™²‘-¥_‰y Ä  Ä uo膞ƒ *   /r, Kz'*Š‰pcBdFžÄ&s1¶ @E;`BQd *LQ\dcdX'd’’S’žu¶ 1lTuU”—‡" €†¶ A&3M!e|,{MG6/M 05 >5IDEM

; ˆC* >ƒ{­]€¶LÄ PW  :HÄ ;fzCgyVÄ ƒ{Ä ,snÄ +yu’¡R£©3u—¶ 0r’¶ ‚SÄ®YHÄ )‘,{ž‰’°+¥h‡}Ä µ 7,ª‰N—²¶1kTpV’‰%¢R~u¶«w¢Ob¶ > 5,n CÄ KMW ]NFC M

 M 1$R+;8d *YPÄ87M’—"u—¶0oZtN&—Š£; †¶m"³¶ F2%Vd ”§)F¶@¶V'd\X';H-Tcd /#Rd¬w06ˆ¶ X',Md MAW4Ed,žÄ 3 (3 /‡y $ * M M



'M›G—½MCĨ—Y} —JH  W #M5 .’$+¥y *y‹¶šH8¶%3.45 +2( /$(5, 5 +Š‹‘ˆ»JÄ,yÀÄ1ƒ]{¯wÃ#ÄQW ¢y¶¯YFÄ )‘/yšŠ„˜+°_‰{Ä (H<·’l¥ÂÄ ¿N<·¬f¼OÄ Ea*d

M '<5‘Fu  & W FqKW+¥i?~Ä AC6‘ ©(];/¢ ¶ ;yŠ›ZvD¶6f"—Vyu”GZƒ”¶"v1¶ ¨ ®Z&W;u¶ ;!dB*J%^“¶ 5CÄ A[-9¶ PnFV,±gˆĉTÄ& 2NyÄ ¨—Gy†O—±¶ 1—31¶‚†R_¶ 

Ä ƒ‘Ä Ÿµ@AG šƒ’Ä" !3

M r.5cd%—Jyv ¶ :`5C$¥¶W Œ05‡¶ 

15 &-#""5 %1y,l v(*^W&;I(Xbd C,¬HCÄ $µrÁÄÄÄ f¡Ä "4M‘žFC C M

Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Agency Hearing Ex. 1 page 13 of 42 DHS

Confirmation Number:MacLean 106281829 v.

AU ! Ù 8M>Ù "#Ù %CÙ .
9%WÙ FHÙ "Ù Ù Ù



&& & $& !&  %" & # &

Ù KNJT2-T3/Ù©;JOD'T@GÙ &Ù

+DE&"!M37?I%84M

 Ù $£¢Ù c¦Z½¿˜ƒ—woÙ ;V-htQ ‹
 28+NRKU :(ÙI·lÙ fÙ SŠrÙ , 88>39?%LUu,P% %£ h.£ (>>!'N >0i<*[?2,N iÒ¤kÙ Z‚xdËٙ7%£ 7=8\df j/£AN4Ùf 0a1W2MBfŒh£ iRpLJ‚8£ ”̾٠S@ŠŠ=hZ£Xfc>?f YºÙ &[ \4&v?]5£9'£‰pX£ÑÙX£c:'SfN()fXf f 'EU AX.iwT Ž>jX£q%€fEX6£j£Ç‹sÙ7+Ù B >ƒ>kX£@^Ož%Š£œ£ C„£_h‘£N>QGš*"£ h£

U >…†Di`£:=B3Q (U U *L<M . hp1>jÙEº»‘´¬Ù  f)K;M 

s%x ’Eic„£hy+z£



%£  >MA@$BH1FM  ,MB  w£+!FF"62U M"-@DU 



U  "BN @WZ+ fh“‡F (£3%Z¡£ T G ) j CL[9^3ODf

„Ù PE]3F,!Fef;'.HU … Ù LH¢%Wf ³€Ù/##-0GM ˆÙ 4P/KCTU h§{]¹_¯g}Ùª|ÁÀ^‡}ÂÙ 

8f 3#0NU”}KaG[3£R;GWfe£ ;*) O%. ¶¨`²ÃÙ׌•cÙ NK&TFf ÌZ L£693J=?N . Vq«Ù_-S"f ¡Ù +. lž“£hb£CN Ã~°Å™ÏšÕ›ÐØÙ i0£#-4:) D$1,NH£S!**UUOAU .

)IG$U Ÿc•>L£ m’¸tbÈsnÙ LN .$Ž3{£ Ÿ”:h›¢£

,Ù Ru­¼“É“ÔvÙ aÓÊÙ 2CC(

M'59=.J:6M M

. />%F&KN£ F;ZY4*#fKd1hgW–Iic£QF$UJ5H+fƉpÙ5*Ù0œÕ™Äµ±Ù֞ŸÙ )£r|h%’$#£ 2mU£H. IE 4;!MN !@ˆMj‰{$£—n£<?J71EUou£[†y®e–z¿Ù͌\ÎÙ i£ dh˜£.b%ffIf^Lf&-5RU

  # 

&#!. .

! "## 

('",. -.  .



Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

=?Q¥1Ù

Agency Hearing Ex. 2 page DHS, pg.141of 42

Confirmation Number: 106281829v. MacLean

IU *+ ÷ APG÷ 50÷ 6°÷ =ER÷

B7W÷ O)÷ ÷ 3,÷ -1÷

Á$÷ ÷

 ))!)(") #%)  &) ' $)

7  $36<= ;7=T¶ªgÜ¡‰ƒu÷ @$¸¹ ·ý À2 ‘$ ýoWƒç}÷ ƒƒ_“'”G•º@ý (D4 1  – ý

»ýE0K1v$!ƒ »4÷

7 (ý Kò«i~Ù÷_…DrÎ` ÷ ;÷Ê Žo¦ý

[ý rSý C:^l›mØ÷ Tý LÅXݕ¹ £÷ p#L`^ƒ

Uý d"Üý ¿†µt õŸsôf!÷ ` Qý %÷ g1,:\^ý Ý!üzý

 ‡÷

*Â2 ˆsýh÷ .3=‰A÷ ý

H÷6Vý fm ý +G Š ¬{;JÞý Rý Ž÷ MЊ·cì½³¨÷ t7qHý



Zý ) ýçÏ;ý  ˜®6ßý,<ý Ë5æý

£Xý b>!ö9ð§ý ?÷ ý JÚi'¨ý¢ ¯×p!àý /'÷ Q4÷¼ý ÂҘº¸÷„÷å‹x÷ è°|Ì.Øûý ±xý  ™‡0néý) cý ­ö÷ ý :-‚ýÞ÷ ÍIȽ#á©ýOE8KPýj=ý"'#&8=(  4=W,ƒ7=7%Ký ôƒ²&Wý ?fXexƒ MT-$L%QqƒYbƒh*ý Z—Ç÷k[ËʚzÉÖ÷ø ý ÕðjŒ÷25=4=ÎÉOšFyýß÷ ÄEAÅÛPý Æp– ãv÷ >÷8÷ o’<“í÷

<÷ NĂÑdꞾ´e©÷Sy#2șî÷ 7 2zBn3ZRƒ&LaDW)$hƒ }@IHƒ "k¥ý÷ˆ¼Ó÷BýÆÏõ4<êýL> ¾=-ý ,07 ó?› ë³&œ¿#+ªý Ð}lHý„ýDÑCìwý%+1#9)&= 7 eDýâñ ã8$IýÒ3«.íž‹ýMý ƒ w4{Cr5'jƒ &)7  ¯à÷ñ±q{Ì÷æ|÷ F4/îý0À?LÓý …ýëw÷

6y7i8[Qƒ BÔýèb÷¢÷ ÇÕ$‘Ÿ&Yý

.&÷ V ÷N ´Œý##/+' ý N1Gƒ9|Ck:ZPƒ æ€Ú÷óÛé÷ 2ù5Ù/ äý~úÖ"ýuòM%#ý ý *-7 9'€ý ïá÷@9÷   ”®÷ Áµ¤NvC¶ý~8s/ƒ’3ýt(UVgƒ  ƒ+"*cFƒ;dƒJ]Í×\¥"(÷      O;ig=\S ] 1l‚m <€Pƒ      !:3=  Fä÷ ¡ý Y¤Ô÷ #,/*-0=â ÷ 3$7 Ï²n÷¬aœ§÷t_ƒ÷ L G 7 JAiu>P.ƒ%†ýýaý]å(ý

%!77 7

1#."757 6 7

  7



Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Agency Hearing Ex. 2 page DHS, pg.152of 42

Confirmation Number: 106281829v. MacLean

.:0  – +5-– – /– %,6–

*;– 03–  – – –

4– –

" – "!  " " "!  "

–  cubg0a &ThK^˜'(vž %= 10= 1Y_=C'a ž eT S~)mvž[!ž=‘vž &= w’v*hŠGL+žN=a

>J*nxž_ož_€?,pž-“,v"udih1rvž žIa@Uh_u„W‚žO=a X`ƒž‘x.ž  bVj†€0mvŒ;s#Œ "rA”/ždŒ "r)*Œ 06Nv„aq)ž™žPZ5cnW‚?d[Œ = 9v@“_|ƒXM– E0i$v1ž e6 kqi,…)&Œ;=F,X!=0a d…–Œ^=(W&=2a0N(– 1  Œ

– Œ   Œ Z$Œ = 8    = TjMb›*2vž Zy‘sJ–…_ž3žBYž‰@dQAhZŒ e7Œ57C 0,(N 9$BMNje 1H:6= ”jj–AN–>I 'NG0N JB)#3Ha P!>1a 





$– "}fU€–2KV‚‡– *)a $L ?!1+N4VkN_š)0yž–GNRž*ž ;I•1Zž f‡tN3pŒo$4pxŒ†_ž != RyzB9G2(Œ %-2;*D"3.N

@N 3'=Ž1ž =<+`a 5TjOc›66zž Ša‹–•kl– 1ž >DpS–Œx– Yvhfpž S~yC:B-'Œ 1=E- Q"=1a

'–   &zG’qWtŽ–#’ˆ{Lg?u– –EŠFuFg]Œ T{|O1$Œ=[.0RKa 7^P– l.pƒDe\yŒ 1[FT~–`„– CQRr– #1{C:[1"ž 9.(= ) \MS?4a]#ž‡?’vž/ "5T #6Ia=no–G‹DuLe^Œ Em=††e\RI– %_—\1\Œvž œž L||D9H)#ž $7=G- N@8a <‰– "/)7= :U=aZaBŠH}Ke_Œ)JAENBO– g]_8=‹cž Ua]LVA%9a8_ržP_;;BX<ž Z$ž =F4: N ˆgs<*žf8Œ A>#&N$e ˆX/`„uŒ h– /MN3H8NSg JfaŒIzŒ }E Qžlt_?CF‰7!ž

-*= =

4+25,#=;= <== 

=



Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Agency Hearing Ex. 2 page DHS, pg.163of 42

Confirmation Number: 106281829v. MacLean

  









71*4.,177",*A491"7>A ("*"4717",*A 0@A 0A'03%A30;!A  06 <3A3=36'A

)A A   A 5:$8A )/&-?A 25/-+5###5A+A-+:8A 

A /:2/-5A %':F '6 <'B F :<+':% :F<% F:<.6:F3!F &B'36F6 5A'6 F 3!F ++F   6,F '6F 6:%,F  6B' F F F -4+3E

A #582#:8#-+A ++F F -4,3E

:F

:F

A 22+A F '<+ F  .'< F<< :F 3 F <'3.:F  .F    <.6:F3!F <%'+F 3.A
:F3! <% F D A<'B F 6.%F

 "  F7>F  < F A$A:
 

F :43.:''+'<' :F.F 3.A<F  F6=F  < F3B - 6F 

F 6'2'4, :F3!F <%',F 3.A
D A<'B F 6 6F  < F <3 6F   44 .'DF  

:F  "

F 46=- .
!F "  " " !" "" " 6.;437=<'3.F  A6'?EF -'.':<6<'3.F  F A-.F :3A6 F.$ - .
 4

.'.$F

$F   6+F '6F6:%+F 7B' F<.6:F3!F 3.A
6='")<'3.F FF   44 .'DF  

F

A /-&#?A F :F :<+':% F EF>%':F '6 <'B F %F -4+3E

F 3!F <% F F F':F D4 < F<3F

 -3.:<6< F:<.6:F 3!F %B'36F3<%F3.F .F3!!F<% F*3F <%
F 36F<% F F F F 36F F 3 :F .3
3.3. F ':F4 6-'::', F36F C3A+F.3
        

  

Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Agency Hearing Ex. 3 page DHS, pg.171of 42

Confirmation Number: 106281829v. MacLean



!!#! O %O FO2EOF1)O A)E>=;E2&272HO=+O EI>)AJ2E=AEO F=O O $;()AEF%;(O%;(O %(1)A)O F=OF1)O A)@I2A):);FEO %;(O EF%;(%A(EO E)FO+=AF1O 2;O F12EO

2A)'F2J)O

 ;EIA)O F1%FO %87O ):?7=M))EOI;()AOF1)2AO EI?)AJ2E2=;O I;()AEF%;(O%;(O %(1)A)O F=OF1)O A)@I2A):);FEO %;(O EF%;(%A(EOE)FO+=CG1O2;OF12EO 2A)'F2J)O  $;()AEF%;(O%;(O %(1)A)O F=O F1)O "!O!)&

-#,-#!-

$#,-

($#!()(-!- #!+)  ;EIA)OF1%FO%87O ):?7=M))EO I<()AO F1)2AO EI?)AJ2E2=;O I;()AEF%;(O%;(O %(1)A)O F=OF1)O "!O")&

-#,-#!-

$#,-($#!()(-!- #!+) -

 =I;E)8O %;(O%(J2E)O):?8=M))EOI;()AOF1)2AOEI?)BK2E2=;O'=;')D2;0O F1)O A)@I2A):);FEO %;(O EF%;(%A(EO E)FO +=AF1O 2;O F12EO 2A)'F2J)O %;(O %EO ;))()(O(2A)'FOF1):O F=O %;O %0);'MO )F12'EO=+,3'2%7O +=AO %EE2EF%;')O L2F1O F1)O %??82'%F2=;O=+O F1)O )!&(- %;(O&!$(  ;EIA)OF1%FO%88O ;)LO ):?7=M))EOI;(*AOF1)2AO EI?)AK2E2=;O A)')2J)O %O?)AE=;%8O'=?MO =+O F1)O A)@I2A):);FEO%;(O EF%;(%A(EO '=;F%2;)(O 2;O G12EO 2A)'F2J)O F1)O)!&(- %;(OF1)O '!(- L2F12;O =;)O L))5O=+OF1)O;)LO ):?8=M))EO );FA%;')O =;O (IFMO  A=J2()O ):?8=M))EOFL=O 1=IAEO=+O =-3'2%8O (IFMO F2:)O F=O A)J2)LO F12EO2B)'F2J)O F1)O )!&(- F1)O&!%(-%;(OF1)O"!O!)&

-#,- #!-

$#,-($#!()(-!-

#!+)   ;EIA)O F1%FO):?7=M))EOI;()AOF1)2AO EI?)AK2E2=;O ')AG2/OF=O 1%J2;0OA)')2J)(O %;(O A)%(O F12EO 2B)'F2J)O F1)O )!&(- %;(OF1)O &!$(- IE2;0O OO O   )()A%9O2AO %AE1%8O !)AK2')O :?8=M))O )AF2,3'%F2=;O  ;2F2%F)O %??A=?A4%F)O '=CC)'F2J)O %'F2=;O L1);O ):?8=M))EO I;()AOF1)2AOEI?)AJ2E2=;O J2=7%F)O F1)O A)@I2A):);FEO %;(O EF%;(%A(EO'=;F%2;)(O 2;O F12EO2A)'F2J)O F1)O )!&(- F1)O &!$(- %;(O F1)O "!O !)&

-#,-#!-

$#,-($#!()(- !- #!+) -

O 28)O %O .;%;'2%7O(2E'8=EIA)O A)?=BGO L1);O A)@I2A)(O&MOF1)O !O O FF);(O )F12'EOFA%2;2;0O%EOA)@I2A)(O&MOF1)O !O &O FO 2EOF1)O A)E>=;E2&282HO=+O ):>8=N))EO F=O O )BF2/O F=O 1%J2;0O A)')2J)(O %;(O A)%(O F12EO 2A)'F2J)O F1)O )!&(- %;(O F1)O &!$(- L2F12;O =;)O L))5O=+O);FAMO =;O (IFMO

 $;()AEF%; O%;(O%(1)A)O F=O F1)O A)@I2A):);FEO %;(O EF%;(%A(EO E)FO +=AF1O2;O F12EO 2A)'F2J) O  $;()AEF%;(O %;(O%(1)A)OF=OF1)O "!O!)&

-#,-#!-

$#,-

($#!()(- !- #!+)  !))6O2;+=A:%F2=;O+A=:O F1)2AO EI?)CK2E=AEO=AO %;O%0);'MO)F12'EO=-3'2%8O '%E)O=+O (=I&FO =AO :2EI;()AEF%;(2;0O=;O F1)O %??72'%F2=;O =+ F1)O A)@I2A):);FEO %<(O EF%;(%C(EO E)FO+=AG1O 2;O F12EO 2B)'F2J)O F1)O)!&(- %;(OF1)O&!(  )O%L%A)O F1%FO%OJ2=8%F2=;O=+O F12EO 2A)'F2J)O F1)O *!&(- F1)O&!$(-=AOF1)O "!O!)&

-#,-#!-

$#,-($#!()(- !- #!+)- :%MO&)O'%IE)O+=AO

%??A=?A4%F)O '=AA)'F2J)O =AO(2E'2?72;%AMO %'F2=;O2;O%((2F2=;O F=O%;MO%'F2=;O =AO?);%8FMO ?A)E'A2&)(O &MO 8%LO

          

Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Agency Hearing Ex. 3 page DHS, pg.182of 42

Confirmation Number: 106281829v. MacLean

% ==.K; ":K;3#.".K :K 32>"3KGK; K % K % 

%

#!% % #"%

K  .K *".K D"; K ; K 1>*"K.K K0= 3K,1*0G:K: **KK 1;".;K 0>3;0>:K .K3:1;*K ,1*0G:K: **KK;;*K ".K ; K1304,.K 0K; "3K>;":K : **K 0.;30*K ; "3K ;,13:K .K ,>:;K E3#:K 1;".K .K ":3;"0.K ,1*0G:K: **K .0;K.K ".K 3>,.;;"CK ":>::"0.:KC.K".K; K K 0K130C0;"0.K .K; GK : **K K ;;.;"CK ;0K ,,3:K 0K ; K 1>*"K :)#.K ::":;.K 03K ".04,;"0.K 03K D 0K :"3K ;0K 3":;3K 0,1*".;:K K  .K*".K D"; K ; K 1>*"K .K K 0; 3K ,1*0G:K".K; K1305-.K 0K ; "3K?;":K : **K.0;K".;.;#0.**GK ,)K :;;,.;:K*#=<*".K ; K *":K 03K ; ".:K 0K .0; 3K .03K : **K= GK ,)K:;;,.;:K; ;K GK ; #3K C3GK >;;3.K D0>*K 3".K ":3";K >10.K ; K% K;!30> K ,0.:=3;"0.K 0K K *)K 0K 0,1::"0.K ;0*3.K @.3:;.".K 03K; 0> ;A*.::K K  .K *".K D"= K = K 1>*#K.K K0; 3K ,1*0G:K".K ; K1304,.K0K = "3K>;":K D"**K.0;K >:K03:K= 3;.#.K 130.K03K".:0*.;K*.>K 03K:;B3:K K  .K *".K D"; K; K1>*"K .K K0; 3K ,1*0G:K".K; K 1305-.K 0K ; "3K>;":K: **K.0;KE13::K.GK 13(>"K0.7".K3K :EK :F>*K03".;;"0.K 3K 0*03K3*""0.K.;"0.*K 03"".K K":"*"=GK ,1*0G,.;K10*";"*K :;.".K 10*";"*K*#:K ,3";*K:;=B:K 13..GK 03K13.; 00K K ,1*0G:K: **K K 1>.=>*K ".K **K 0K ; "3K .,.;:K .K ; GK : **K "*#.;*GK 1304,K; "3K>;":K K ,1*0G:K : **K 3.3K ",13<"*K %".;K .K ;"CK :3C":K ;0K ; K 1>*"K ".K ; K ": 3K0K= "3K >;":K .K *DG:K 33K ; "3K 0&K :K 0.K 0K 1>*#K =3B:;K K ,1*0G:K: **K1304,K= "3K>;":K".K K0@3<0>:K "3K (>:;K ",13;#*K .K 3:0.*K,..3K .K2>**GK;0KC4G0.K K ,1*0G:K : **K 130;;K .K0.:4CK 0C8,.;K 13014:K 03K **0DK ";:K >:K 03K.GK>.>; 03"IK1>310::K "K ,1*0G:K : **K3103;K D:;K >K >:K .K 09@1;"0.K ;0K ; K 113013$;K % KK 03K

K 0"*:K % 

"% $

%

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

Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Agency Hearing Ex. 3 page DHS, pg.193of 42

Confirmation Number: 106281829v. MacLean

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�+#66RU$0>&#D&$U9$U9@>;O6RU >&6D&$UD;U  /&U ;<&>D0;9CU ;'UD/&U )U

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

Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Agency Hearing Ex. 3 page DHS, pg.204of 42

Confirmation Number: 106281829v. MacLean

/ #EKDJ\55R^R<1DD^ GJS^ 12UR5^ UR5^ G5;D=;5GSD\^ G5;D=;5GSC\^ 41E1;5^ JM^DJR5^ ;JX5QE5GS^5LU=KE5GS^ S
-^ .-^ JN^ "*.^

/ 0=JC1S=JG^ J6^ 6545M1D^ RS1S5^ JN^ DJ31D^D1Z ^^ 3JGX=3S=JG^6JM^ S<5^ X=JC1S=JG^ J6^ 1G\^ D1Z^ R<1DD^25^   5X=45G35^ J6^ 1^X=JC1S=JG^J6^ S<=R^ "=N53S=X5^ G^ 13LU=SS1C^JN^ C13B^ J6^ 1^6JNE1D^3N=E=G1D^ 3JEKD1=GS^E1\^ GJS^ KM53DU45^ 1G^=GS5Q1D^ 14E=G=RSN1S=X5^ =GX5RS=;1S=JG^ 1G4^ RU2R5LU5GS^4=R3=KC=G1O\^13S=JG^

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

Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Agency Hearing Ex. 3 page DHS, pg.215of 42

Confirmation Number: 106281829v. MacLean

G "/$&'G *)!0/G =B;AU))KW K6$;;W?ALW KA<7'7LW AGW $'')BLW$?UW572W7?'
G

&W !**)G)(W &UW $WBGA67&7L)(W KAOG')W 7?'43A4B G  G 0."G*#G ,*.&/&*)G =B$?')W A*W A*+8'7$;W(OLUW AG W 'W PA7(7?5W L6)W 'A?K)DO)?')KWA*W 7<<)5$;W $'LKW&UW7=BGAB)G
AL7+8'$L7A?WG)FO7G)=)?LW *AGW AOLK7()W )=C;AV=)?LW

W"W)=B)?LWK6$;;W ?AL74WL6)9GW 7==)(7$L)W W"W KOB)HQ7KAGW 7?WRG7L7?5WA*W%?UWAOLK7()W )=B;AU=)?LW $?(W 7?'$L7A?WG)DO)KL)(W &UWL6)W W"WKOB)GQ7KAGWAGW)BOLUW L67'KW!.8'7$<W

G 

G

  G 57 +G?6GG9<:=82EC@FC;=G

Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Agency Hearing Ex. 3 page DHS, pg.226of 42

Confirmation Number: 106281829v. MacLean

, ` "HMDK^00S`H+^` IKT` 0I;+;0` =I` KWTS=/0`0HMDK^H0IT`KO`KT<0O`KWTS=/0` +-T>Y=T^`T<+T` -KI9=-TS`[>T<`T<0=O` K7-=+D` /WT>0S ` 'WTS=/0`0HMDK^H0IT`-KI4E=-TS` [=T<`+I` 0HMDK^00S` K6@->+D` /WT>0S` >3`  $T` =S`MOK<>,>T0/`,^`ST+TXT0` "\0-WT>Y0`'O/0O`KO` 20/0O+D`O0;WD+T=KIS` >I-DW/=I;` ,WT`IKT`D=H>T0/`TK` T<0` 

 T<0` 4AI+I-=+D`-KI4E=-TS` K2`>IT0O0ST` ST+TXT0``* ( .` (0-T>KI`` T<0` ST+TXT0S`MOK<=,=T>I;`O0MO0S0IT+T=KI+D`+-T=Y=T=0S` `* (  ` (0-T>KIS` ` +I/`` +I/`T<0` ST+TWT0` MOK<>,>T>I;` T<0` SWMMD0H0IT+T>KI` K2`+I` 0HMDK^00S` ;KY0RH0IT` S+D+Q^``* (  `(0-T=KI``  `  [KWD/` O0NW>O0` T<0` 0HMDK^00S` /=SNW+D=8-+T=KI` 2OKH`H+TV0OS`SK` -0ITP+D` +I/` -O>T=-+D` TK`T<0` 0HMDK^00S` K24@->+D` /WT=0S`T<+T`T<0`0HMDK^00S` +,>D>T^` TK`M0O2KPH`T<0` /WT>0S` K2` T<0?O` MKS=T=KI` [KWD/` ,0`H+T0O>+DD^`>HM+=O0/`  ` $T` <=I/0OS`T<0` H>SS=KI` K2 T<0`#`%(` )(` KO`

')` KO`

 -O0+T0S`T<0`+MM0+O+I-0` T<+T`T<0` 0HMDK^00` =S` Y>KD+T=I;`T<0`D+[` KO`0T<=-+D` ST+I/+O/S ` - ` &K` 0HMDK^00` [>DD`+--0MT`0HMDK^H0IT` -KHM0IS+T=KI` M+^H0IT` K2`0]M0IS0` KO`+I^` KT<0O` T<>I;` K2` HKI0T+P^` Y+DW0` WI/0O` -=O-WHST+I-0S` =I` [<=-<` +--0MT+I-0`H+^`O0SWDT` =I` KO` -O0+T0` T<0` +MM0+O+I-0`K2` +`-KI4E=-T`K2` =IT0O0ST ` )<0`2KGDK[>J;` KWTS=/0`0HMDK^H0IT` +-T=Y=T=0S`+O0` 0]+HMD0S` K2`+-T=Y>T=0S`T<+T`-KI4D=-T` [=T<` KO`-O0+T0` T<0`+MM0+O+I-0` K2`+` -KI5F=-T`K2`BIT0O0ST`  "HMDK^H0IT` MOKY=/=I;`S0-WP>T_`KO` D+[`0I2KO-0H0IT`S0PZ>-0S`TK` KO`KI` ,0<+D2` K2` +I^`KWTS>/0` 0IT=T_`  ` "HMDK^H0IT` [=T<` +I^`KWTS>/0`0IT=T^` 0I;+;=I;` =I` T<0` S+D0` H+IW2+-TXP0` KO` /=STP>,WT=KI` K2`S0-WO>T^` 0NW=MH0IT` 4AO0+OHS` +HHWI=T>KI` KO`0]MDKS=Y0`/0Y>-0S`  ` "HMDK^H0IT` [>T<`+I^`KWTS=/0`0IT=T^` KO` M0OSKI` [=T<` [I;S` KI`,0<+D2`K2`T<0`#`%(`)(`KO` !')`  "I;+;=J;` =I` S+D0S` +-T>Y>T^` =I-DW/>I;`T<0` SKD=-=T+T=KI`K2` ,WS=I0SS` KO` T<0` O0-0>MT` K2`KO/0OS`[<=D0` KI` /WT^` KO`  ` "I;+;=I;` =I` KWTS>/0` 0HMDK^H0IT`KO` KT<0O`KWTS=/0`,WS>I0SS` +-T=Y=T_` T<+T` MOKY=/0S`;KK/S` KO`S0PY>-0S`TK` T<0` #`%(` )(`KO`

')`KO`[=T<` M0OSKIS` KO`0IT=T>0S` [
,WS=I0SS`=IT0O0STS` +O0` +220-T0/` ,^`#`%(` )(` KO`

')` PXD0S` KO`O0;WD+T=KIS `

/` &K`0HMDK^00`[=DD` 0I;+;0`=I`KWTS=/0`0HMDK^H0IT` KO` KT<0O` KWTS=/0`+-T=Y>T_`T<+T` >HM+=OS`T<0`0HMDK^00S`H0IU+D` KO`M<^S=-+D`+,>D>T_`TK` M0O2KQH`#%(` /WT>0S`+I/` O0SMKIS=,=D=T>0S` >I` +I` +--0MT+,D0`H+II0O ` 0 ` &K` 0HMDK^00`[=DD`0I;+;0` =I` +J^`KWTS>/0`,WS=I0SS`KO`+-T=Y=T^`[<=-<` =HM+=OS`T<0` KM0O+T=KI`KO`028-=0I-^`K2`T<0`#%( ` 2 ` &K`0HMDL^00`H+^`WS0` S=-C`D0+Y0` TK`0I;+;0`>I` KWTS=/0`0HMDK^H0IT` KO` +I^`+-T=Y>T_` +SSK->+T0/`T<0O0[=T< ` ; ` 'WTS>/0`0HMDK^H0IT` >S`M0OH>TV0/`=2`T<0O0`=S` IK` O0+D>ST>-` MKSS>,=D>T_` K2` +`-KI:>-T`K2` BIT0O0ST` KO` T<0`+MM0+O+I-0` K2`+` -KI4E>-T`K2` =IT0O0ST ` "HMDK^00S` +O0` 0I-KWO+;0/`TK`-KIT+-T` T<0` )(`<>02` KWIS0DS` '7-0` 2KO`;W>/+I-0` KI` [<0T<0O` KWTS>/0` 0HMDK^H0IT` KO` KT<0O` KWTS>/0` +-T>Y=T>0S` -KI4E=-T` [=T<` +I` 0HMDK^00S` K6A->+D` /WT=0S ` ` ` `     

Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Agency Hearing Ex. 3 page DHS, pg.237of 42

Confirmation Number: 106281829v. MacLean

               4736G

=I

=*33I 56>IA= I 69I7 94,>I>* I A= I6"I >* ,9I)6C :4 5>I 76=,>,65I 69I >,>3 I 69I 5GI A>*69,>GI ==6,> I E,>*I >* ,9I 7A3,I 6"& I >6I 569= I 69I 79646> I 5GI 796A>I = 9D, I69I 5> <9,= IA53 ==I7796C IGI >* II I,9 >69I 5I>* I I*, "I6A5= 3=I%- I

              I 4736G

=I=*33IC6,I==6,>,65I69I79?,,7@,65IE,>*I F>9 4,=>I 69)5,H>,65=I69I

>,C,>, =I>*>I9 I,565=,=> 5>IE,>*I>* ,9IA>, =I5I9 =765=,,3,>, =I =I I 4736G

=I

F>9 4,=>I 69)5,H>,65=I 69I>,C,>, =I9 I  $.5 I =I 65 =I >*> I

 C6> I 9,3I ) 5 9I 69I ?+5,I*>9 I 69I,5>63 95 I

 C6> I 9 > I 69I 5)) I,5I ,33 )3I,=9,4,5>,65I= I65I9 I6369I ) 5 9I9 3,),65I 69I5>,653I69,),5 I 69I

 C6> I>* I A= I6"I"69 I69IC,63 5 I 69I A53E(3I4 5=I>6I 79/C I,5,C,A3=I 6"I >* ,9I90)*>=IA5 9I>* I5,> I>> =I65=>,@B>,65I69I>* I 3E=I 6"I>* I5,> I>> =I 69I6"I 5GI=>> I I 4736G

=I=*33IC6,I9 )A39I69I65>,5A6A=I ==6,>,65=I69I 3,5)=IE,>*I7 9=65=I

E*64I >* GI 156EI 69I =*6A3I26EI 9 I A5 9I904,53I,5C =>,)>,65I 69I,5,>4 5>I 69I E*6I *C I I 9 7A>>,65I /5I >* I 644A5,>GI "69I 79 = 5>I ,5C63C 4 5>I,5I" 365,6A=I69I904,53I  *C,69I F 7>I=I5  ==9GI,5I >* I7 9"6945 I 6"I 6%.,3I A>, =I 69IE* 9 IA5C6,3 I  A= I 6"I 6>* 9I 7 9=653I 9 3>,65=*,7=I  I 4736G

=I =*33I 56>I 156E/5)3GI C,=,>I69I ' 8A 5>I I *6A= I6"I796=>,@B>,65I )43,5)I

*6A= I 69I5GI =>3,=*4 5>I E* 9 ,5I"  93I =>> I 69I363I 3E=I 9 IC,63> I

         I 4736G! =I =*33I56>I9/>,,H I69I 9,,A3 I II  I 69II 763,GI69I 6@* 9I 4736G

=I GI =7

*I E90>,5)I 69I 6>* 9I F79 ==,65I >*>I ,=I  "4>69GI 6= 5 I A53E(3I

,47,9=I @* I 67 9>,65I 69I %-, 5GI 6"I>* II  I 69I I 69I,=I 4 IE,>*I 9 13 ==I ,=9 )9I "69I>* I >9B>*I I 4736G

=I=*33I56>I 9 > I  79>,,7> I,5I A56"#.,3I 5> : >IE =,> =I65 ;,5)I

>* II I  I69II 4736G

=I=*33I56>I 9 3 = I69I ,CA3) I 5GI,5"694>,65I

9 3> I>6I@* I I I  I 69II >6I A56%-,3I5> : >I E =,> =I I 53GI >* I,9 >69II I 69I*,=I =,)5

I4GI A>*69/H I 5GI7A3,I =>> 4 5>=I

65 :,5)I>* II I  I 69I I 53 ==I  =,)5> I GI >* I ,9 >69I II 4736G

=I=*33I56>I9 ==I7A3,I)>* 9/5)=I77 9I65I9,6I 69I > 3 C,=,65I79 79 I5GI

9>,3 =I"69I 7A3,>,65I >I =I699 =765 5>=I >6I I5 E=77 9I69I7 9,6,3I 9 3 = I69I ,CA3) I ,5C =>,)>,C I ,5"694>,65I 69I 5GI 6>* 9I 4@> 9=I 7 9>,5,5)I >6I >* I I I  I 69I I

         

Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Agency Hearing Ex. 3 page DHS, pg.248of 42

Confirmation Number: 106281829v. MacLean

 " "" "" "  " M 4826J>M:M8:6())@M :64M:2>)5'M>5>)@)FM 6:M2>>)#,M)5 6;4@)65MD52>>M E@(6:)LM JM @(MMM2>>)!*M 6D45@>ME>@6)5M



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

M6JM M

@)5'M 5:M :@;KM 6 M :5>86:@@)65M 6:M D:/AJM

" "   "       

Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Agency Hearing Ex. 3 page DHS, pg.259of 42

Confirmation Number: 106281829v. MacLean

  



&/:7S ` E6`

ACQ@05=6AKES

"!"+S

-_d³× k ǁĔƆH ǁǁd;¿ÄÔÀ ;ǁ

"78=-"/=G 5#G80;738=>$4/G "!"8+G D%>&5/G !-'/(;?8>)61G 86.6>'5/,FG/!G 9"":G7758>A/*@$"GC-"8G    G š„ǁ <C -ǁ Åٜe ;ǁ '59C <C Ďǁ 3  ǁ

2:< 2+C 3ƭ ǁÇf2´v–Š× (OD¿¥e½Î× )˜OCt2€f³´× ˜ô  ǁ !őǁ&X]*mĞK<2 ǁ"!` >ǁ  ǁĀ*ǁćĭǁ æ (#Ɨ "O 6…fC ǁ

&'A'N_`+C 1=hd ǁǁI2 2 ǁ

5=!3,C ğ ǁ

6-"B>#5.C 4?$2/C m.ǁ !%Œ Aǁ!CAƩ*ǁ ! İz(ǁjĸ{ ƪ ǁŀǁ çƮşXǁjƯŢ…ǁ ėuƬ{[ǁ

K0P` lƵZǁ ǁ ǁH $ƶǁ R–›× Ƈ  z“5ǁ•‘U ¸ǁ 7C 2C 40;%8@&50C !

ǁ ,•ÅœHO®×

[U>1Q` OJO£6‡× $ǁ "2®_2‡³× ™õ!ċ ]ǁ  8ǁ ǁ Ɠ7œ ǁ$T ǁƈǁĝ:ĘMǁ $ƉǁF2œ©gMž¯× 2°× O{'C  ǁ GƊǁ gŠW„qZ_´× ( # ­ǁn®× 3ÕO×2Àº`–ŸhÐOI×´–×C3ª«Ì× yŤ/ǁ 2ŠJ× ˆ2xO× / ǁ  ǁ ¯O< [× T8/` 34OZ` Łǁ‹Tyƣ*ǁv‹*ħǁ 8 5( :ǁ

(0)1AC(U2` '“ǁ;ҞN Æǁ

*-)1C OIS`#–´Oך˜fC2»³×2 OׄƳǁ D)ƋVǁǁ C–ˆšyOµO× ǁ8ůŠı$ǁ.ŸǁĐ  ǁ ǁÿǁ

ǁ  ˜@^  &2˜O§×2˜šyfF3´iŠ®×  C ŪǁBÌ× ÇÈÊ<ÚÁ <ǁ7Ű ǁ =O× IJ ǁǁ J uO®°O KLf´f–Š3y×fŠT–­3´j–Š×`2³× ǁ Ŕ FƌsǁǁƝ@ǁ/ſ ƕ ǁĻ# #ǁ 6ǁ'G ǁš€C ǁÌǁ =ǁ ǁ Л ǁ !#Uǁp(DHA ļŴ( àǁ Á2‡eYC2ºf–‹×



pD)ƍY ¡ǁ &  ǁ - JǁêGFCŕ Ŗǁ4ǁ "Š´ ;%Oׂe[e>d{u´Ï×.OŽ×S׃e^d=lzmºÎ×'±Kˆ˜  ̈ Š¶× ‡v[n?eyv¶Ï× ĕD)7ŒY ǁ>ǁǁ ™š‡Ì× 2ŠI×PǁnƎǁ ,4/®ǁ o  VǁƏ%Aǁ  ǁ ³OE´o‘×H3¦MTÂy„Í×

$%/*× É¯ǁ R@ǁ  ǁ ³2‡3¬Î¥5Š\P×f®× ›OV‡OE·PI× %Mǁ"6ǁ  /–ǁŒŋǁ Wǁ ǁƄs0ǁĺǁ =O` `  1=iJ< ǁ ǁ1hg¢Ï áǁ >ǁK

IÑÍ× ǁ ǁ1ÕÖÎ âǁǁ ,ǁ ¤ IiN*f ǁGǁ 12 2 :ǁ ,ǁ £ǁ šZ  † 3¡O× ”V ǁ [ǁ(ǁ fӗǁ ?ǁl4ijĽŵŸǁ %|.ĮŗŬ0ǁ &4Ì× +2{2¦Ì× |. ǁǁŧ)ǁ ǁ Ř Hǁ   ƫǁ–ǁ ǁ ǁ ¸aO× J 0ǁ ŭ Źǁ Wǁ ´bOך ³k bǁ N°ǁ ö/Ĩ.ǁ !7ǁ&ĩE Xǁ   ǁ 

ǁǁ  #źǁ Ő#ǁ@ǁ ) [ǁ 2µ×Ũ ǁ ƒƦF ĪŻǁ EO2 :ǁ



 ` P& ǁ šO¢U’›ˆ× ›O[Ã|5›×2  ,` •cǁ Ƨ% ^ǁƢ@ǁ łƒB5ǁǁ v^ǁw ǁ% ǁ ËOQx¯× ǁǁ 7MǁR9ǁ EūǁBŽ#) ǁ ƐZǁǁ řW’ǁǁǁ ǁ E3y…× egǁ `–Ä£®× Fǁ0±ǁq ǁ8 9Jǁŏ9ǁ`3ÈO×}fˆf¶NJ×I   3'CT ǁ ]?V:`4 9ǁ†ǁ



 



BŚǁţǁxxºǁ ÷ǁ&ǁ E% ǁǁ ǁ ǁ }ǁ ǁŃ 5ǁ  $ ǁ ǁ ǁ ³–ˆO´fˆO²×š“yf¼kE3{yÌ×  ǁ OF“Š–ˆeF2‡‡Ì×

ĉű½¾ ².ƾĢ

  ¸k ®× 0ǁ Ƃǁ  ƞ6ǁ _5Ñ3¨I®×  ǁ ǁ ǁ Ŝǁ ˆǁ )ńǁ ´ǁ 'rǁ đĒ?Ą3'Ěǁq>ǁ ,ęǁ '"ǁå?íǁ

ĈĊŲġģƅ

"ǁ Čîó"ǁ !!× Pǁ "þOǁ 3Qëą"Ć'-ǁ øǁ O&o?r&ï'ěǁ-ǁ ,ìOQRāùĂðkǁ #` -ñéĜăQǁ =ǁ úǁ0×

'<*#$M91LNS `bĥûäčƘµĦ‚ƙ cS ǁO‡f[f@O×

SĶ5ǁ ŝƱ šōŞǁ ǁǁ ‰Ĺ$ǁ Ņǁľ8 9ż·ǁ 3  ǁ Žǁ  R S - ¡3  . wǁ‚Ƒǁ $ņŠ‡’¶ǁ

ƛƃ\ĵ}ƽǁ

 `$%5`‘ĿžƜťƥŦƲǁ”¡×ķǀƁŊīơĠď L

DOFS 28GS     

''% "&#$( )  )!)   ) %.P;3II4S ,.>JB?S    S )(S  -H2 S    

  `

Agency Hearing Ex. 4 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829 page 261of 42 MacLean v. DHS, page

44

$*(: :2) :

‚Ċ˴ş/>˴ʉ˴ ȖF˴˴ -V˴˴  ˴ +˴ɨá˴ ˴˴  z˴  B=˴/ˍ˴) ˴" E" ˴˴ #&˴”ȏɻ˴ˎ T •ʊÔ˴˴˴  %  ˴%˴

˴ 8¹˴ '˴(˴Š/>˴ *ƭ,˴ NCFɎâ˴ mz˴ J]˴ 1˴/K˴ ˴ɩ Eǵ ˴˴!˴ˏ#3ƙ˴ .

˴ *˴ ˴ ˴ ˴ ˜  #˴£ h ˴5 ċ˴  B 1Œ>ˇ ˜ʋ˴˴! ˴$˴ ǯ˴B ˴<Ĵ[*µğ˴)  ˴ !22˴ '˴BƓ{b^ƻę˴JĮįĵÚÝ˴˴J <Û Þ]˴ )2 (";$ #.9'  *(; 0# ˴ʣ ˴˴Ɣ{cČ˴  ǶI˴  ;%#1% +(; ‡   ˴ʤ˴˴ ˴€˴$ )˴6˴č˴ 0B &˴0/żŽžd˴ ˴ #% ,Ȧ*˴ '˴&'˴ W" ˴= " ˴ ,.˴ &˴Ǩɪ˴ B&2˴Ì)˴&)˴  ˴IJ_ ˴2· $Ď˴ ?)!ʥ˴ʸ )B ˴ ˴˴G ) ˴ 1 ˴ .˴ ˴ &˴Í$˴ʹ ˴ Ƿ  ˴N˴B˴5˴lǓS) ȭ Ě˴ ?©˴6˴ 9˴˴ɿ˴. ˴ ˴ )ǩ  ɫ ď˴ 0˴ã#˴ː˴ʌȽʍ˴"E ˴˴˴2lD('Đ˴ #/:;,! ;&#0& -(; =@˴raķ˴ `˴$˴ǘ˴ ,˴X 2ȾI˴c˴ʺɛ"Ʈ˴ Ȯ*˴OƜ!˴˴ ˴

˴  ¿T !+˴ "  +˴ ȠY˴ j¨G %WY˴˴  ˴ ɬ'¬! ,$˴đ Ǹǃ˴ :țŃ˴ LƆ˴0 ʢ'˴A˴e ˴  S ɭ# ˴˴˴'Õ˴ -˴ ˴*˴– |˴

=@rŪĸ˴L#˴$ )˴Ǚ˴  jÇ ˴X %DŽ˴S™!Q # ˴˴ ˴Š@[‹˴Q!ŵ˴LƇ˴Ŗ¤ɜ   È˴©˴ ˴ɦU#À˴ È˴  ˴ -˴'-˴ )Dž˴29B %˴$˴A˴" ʦ˴Vʎ˴%˴ˌ" ĥ˴ȗ  +˴  ˴ šk8 š'4˴ªQ ˴ˑȊ Ư+˴,:4˴˴ !&B˴ }˴ =@;Ĺ˴ L˴$"˴N˴ Æ˴ʻª-P ˴«ʧW 9˴˴9˴Š@çŒ˴ Gȧě˴ b ¡%Æ ˴ˆX "ưƒ˴ˆX ˴ǹ#ŘȨ ˴.˴ Ķ˴ʼ -˒˴# ˴ ɑ ɮ˴ʀ±P»˃è"( ˴ʽ 2Ʊ ˴˴  ˴  Ʋ ˴"ȋC ˴Ǻ#!Cń˴ A'¶¦2˴#  %˴ " ˴! ˈ ,%˴  ˓ ˴A ˴!%…˴ !ħĤ %˴˴% ȡȯ& ˴ ˴"˴  ˴ 5  ȿ˴ !h'˴" *…˴ ˴ W% ›˴ ¾$˴Ȝ+˴p4˴˴G § ,Ù˴   ˴ )& ˴˴Gʏ%k˴ $I˴ ; 0­f˴ŗɓ£ɝf#ʁʐ7#„˴Ş(ʯ˴/ "ǻȢ˴<`H˴<_€_H˴ ˴1//˴  ˴ ˴ɀʵ˴ Ɲ$˴ * Ȱ˴N'˴š  ˴œT˴KŸ˴  &Ē˴ƋO ˴ ˴˴#:˴ ˴Á˴ƒ#% ˴Șƪ˴ & pq˴ 3 "˴ 0˴0  ɔI˴ ?% ˴ “·¥°¡$˴ ō ˴&Ǵ˴ދé B m˴ ! ˴ e"˴#.˴%˴ ! ˴ BH˴ *˴˴aŅ˴ %'˴ pD l $˴ (˴ & ˴1aä˴#$Bƞƽ ˴ !˴ ) ˴'.˴C˴ ʰ ˴<+˴ q˴ B  ˴Œņ˴ ˴ ˴ mD ³ $êʑ˴&˴ƂŨ;Ĩı˴ Ǫ ˴ʱ˴˴.˴Ǽ§ë ! ˴ `+˴ 5*˴ 5˴ B 657438; c9  Ɵɯ ĺ˴ 1/K˴  ɞȩƴe&˴ ˴ ˴˴% ˴ʂ˴ &˴ Q ˴)«-ȱ Ɂ ˴ʨ˴˴ſē¶ ˴ŰĔɕ˴

!ʃ#4˴ %!B˴-^˴ 0 ȝ˴ '˴Ȳ  ˴ǫǽɰȳ8˴ ˴ȴɖ- ˴D2|˴



řNJNjɳ¤7ɅȀ#˴ Ǜ˴ƌf7ʲg˴śƖ—7ƫ7,79$„˴ ƘU˴  ˴ . ˴  ˴ F˴˴–,˴ǜ'"˴ B *Ė˴ Ś ɺȔ˴ »˴$+˴$˴*˴ ‘ ˴ Ƶin˴ ǝʔ˴3¬ ɴ˴ʕ˴ Ŭ6˴®Ɇ ˴ "˴Ǧʬ®˴ʖZ˴$'3˴ : ˴ ˴ ( ˴ 5#˴EʩT ˴  ˴ƶ ˴FO ˴ Ǟ¢ .Ļ˴  B (-ÄÅŇ˴ B > ˴ʾ¥Ƣ(+˴  ƾ ˴˴ $ɘ  ˴¼ň˴İė˴?ì ȸ ,*½˴ƿo3˴ (ʼn˴ ˴ij~˴ ƉʪȌ q˴ ¢¯ɇ˴ °!Å]˴ ŭ˴ '4˴  ɡ Ʒ&˴ ɵ "¯˴˴ An)˴¾˴:

˴˴njSj ˴ ˴ȹ (˴8 ˴ ;ɽ $ʗɌɍ+˴ V˴¿˴b1[J‚+˴ Ƅ CƀůƗĬƣio˴ "˴Żȍ ˴Ɗ) *˴?ȁ Ȃ¹Ŋ˴ ʳi ˴ µ˴6˴% Ç  Y˴ &˴6˴²ºH˴ ! ˴  +˴ V 4˴oȃZ˴˴ n•ʘ˴   ŋ˴Ɉ ˴ -!ɧ˴ ˴ (˴ ˴½˴  ˴  ˴! -˕ļ˖˴ʶə˴!˴ ±MF˴ž. ’ ˴˴&ɹ˴ 6 ˗˘˙˚Ê˴3 Ľ˛Ŏ ˝˞ ˟ƚˠˡŏˢĢĜŮ˅ˣˤ˥˦(˧~ƛ˨Ő˩Ȓ˲˪ĂŁ˫șˬ˭ģőȞűīĝĦˮƅĞƼË˴ ˜ \\ís ˯ƬȚÓDZʙȣ łĄîïðwˉˊñòóôõö÷ˋøyxyĀ˰ùuā vúûü 



  w; d ɗέĠġ Ø ȵÒ B

ŀ

xȶơ˄ttǤ ¸¸ǂą“'ǧȼÁdzɱƩåLjʄʅȷuɄ vɲ˴ R˴   ! ".Bº˴   ˴ ”ʟ˴ (+˴  M ˴D$˴˴ P ˴ ˴ ţ˴/Ÿ˴Ä˴ ˴lj˴  ! *^˴ ĕ ƃ9ý‰ɢ *Ⱥgʚ˴ ‰ȪǭȄȅȤȎ(ʿ˴ƈE3Ȇ²Ǎg ʆƒ˴ 0Ƥ ȇ  ˴35<,*B6:=;B1ŔK˴ ɣ(Ȉɉ˴Ãʛ˴ UǟUȫ *˴ƸȻ & ˴ (˴ Ǡ

Rʷ˴Ť³ ˴ 7dŽ˴† Mȟ˴ B ũɊ ʫÀ˴ ˀ˴ DzÉ˴Ŧ˴ƦĈ &8>ŜɏǑ ɐ ǒȉ›ȐǮǎ×ȕʞǕǖZǗ É˴0/?(-)4+B  '1B   ! ɥɸǏʴćþʭʮǀ’-ƧȥĪĉ:ăǐǢ˳ǥƁƏʠŲM˴ʇʜƨʡĘ˴ĭ˱źƐ˴ † ƹž˴B ƺɚǁà  ˴ ˁ˴  ˴ŧŷŝƑ‡æ˴ ʈ˴ 8˴ (´¼Pɋ˴ ¨ʝ˴ǣR˴

 ,885 .3'7)%&+49-6"/0#1

:

!  :

Agency Hearing Ex. 4 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829 page 272of 42 MacLean v. DHS, page

ÿĿ Ö

3C #C C $C

ĬġĝĢŞǁ -0ģŲĭ1ū¬ ǁƺĵőƻƂǁÝĞƷǁǁ k™ƣ Ł8ǁŹǁ ƛ ǁǁ"ǁ'ę Ĺ *ǁ   ǁ ?*Dǁ C b¿ǁ }ǁS$ùǁ?*Dǁbǁ› Ƥ%ğǁǁǁIǁǁ ǁǁ=ǁ ';;& W ǁ ǁáWlÏÀǁ 3>ǁIǁ/U…ǁ? ĚDǁ3ǁ !'ǁǁ ǁQ ǁĮǁǁǁ)ǁ'į&W(ǁ %ǁ? DǁÐ^ǁI RegÿǁĂ+ǁ5‰@@55åĆ44‹ǁ @+/úe$ǁ $d}/$„ǁ +Bǁ$+ǁ+?ăR7ǁǁ$+Aǁ5@B$ǁ:4 þ 7:ǁŠR44ǁ†ä5‰e$ǁ CUĀRTUë+Tǁ +Qǁ õA4+ċS|7$ǁ ‡ ǁæHBóǁ Bǁ/†‡d4_ǁ f‹ǁ5Ĉ5ûg7Ąǁ„ôà:öT$ǁòǁf+U€ýǁA+5ñˆƒ+÷ǁ ǁ: 7ǁ?ǁ$B/‚T$ãGǁ ‚āǁ fø$ǁçg B 7ˆ|Hǁ7Hǁ/A4+Ċ/7$ǁŠ$dǁ$€ǁQ %/’Ec3>xM_>b<`?b‰ u&   -@7‰Qkb×ÓÚ±Ûǁì )'(ǁǁĽ"ǁ#ǁƼǁİǁ ƃǁ¡Ŕǁǁ  %ŏǁĉí* ǁnǁ   ǁǁ  ǁ ,5C )ǁ<‘¢ůǁ ǁ8ǁ;  ǁǁv (ǁǁ~Ƅ*ǁ ǁ/2 Áǁ ǁ ïð ǁ<ǁ ǁ).Č  Ĥųǁǁǁ ǁ ǁ ł ƅǁƥ ǁK ǁ1ǁ5¤ǁ ƭǁƮǁ,š"ş=ǁǁ&ǁǁ % ƽǁ'ǁǁ (ǁ<16ǁǁ ǁ 1Ɯ ǁ&ǁǁǁ ǁ  Lǁ ǁǁ +&)0EǁƏ—œǁ ũŪ uǁ ²ǁǁ &1!ǁǁ ǁ"Ńjsǁǁǁ !ǁ  ǁ ǁ ǁ)ǁ  ǁ (ǁ!ǁ l  ACC  !ǁ ǁ ǁ  ŕǁ?;C ǁŒ£ǁ ǁ ǁ ǁƨ ǁǁǁ Y 6ǁ 2 tǁ 8ǁ&#Lǁǁǁ 0 !ǁ .ťŦǁ 7 :=:C 8+C ǁ  & ¶ǁ K!%[ǁǁ Fǁǁǁ". Âǁǁ ĥ ǁ .((ǁ  ǁǁ  0ǁ ǁ )ǁǁ;=.ǁ ǁǁ—ĦǁǁE ǁƩ ǁ'™  ǁ 0

ǁ  ǁ čǁ Ɔ ǁrǁ ǁ #+ '0 ǁ ǁ Mǁ ǁǁ D  ǁ Œǁ!  ( ªǁƯ=ǁ§ǁ ǁ ǁ&  Þǁ ǁ  0 ǁ ǁ 2 ǁ ǁ 0 (ǁ ǁǁŖ&¢«ǁơžjmǁ-ǁ ǁ“Z2 ǁ  ǁǁ ǁ ǁưǁ ǁĕiǁpƐ·ǁ ǁ   ǁǁ2)ǁǁ ŗF2«ǁX(ǁǁŝƱ  ǁǁ  (ǁ=ħǁǁǁ ǁǁ“'KƵǁ ¨ ǁǁ jǁZ0Š¥ªǁEǁ n Ãǁǁ   ǁ *ŧǁ *-9C ǁ ǁǁ"ǁ ǁ;ƪĠǁǁǁ )!ǁǁ#ǁ ǁ-ǁǁq & ǁ Eǁ. ǁ 0d  ǁ2ǁńǁ ǁ  ǁ ǁǁ !ǁ  ǁǁ)*ǁǁo \ǁ&  ǁľǁ  ¸ǁ q &!˜Mǁǁ  ǁ <ǁ"ÎǁK

ǁ © ƾ*ǁ 1)CǁĘ ǁ ǁ !ǁŬǁ ǁƕ, Lǁ nsǁ Ɩ

6ǁǁ2Ņ"ĨǁĴŨŸ¡Űwǁ '’^ŠVs^A$(*"'0 SYņ , mǁ ,  ǁŐ ǁƸǁJŒ( ǁǁ,ǁ!#'  wǁ

+>C ǁ 01'@C ŇǁƦ ǁź  ǁǁ# , ǁ  ”,ě ň#_ǁ…' Cǁ ǁ ǁ ĿǁʼnŴƑǁ ǁ "C  ǁoZǁ"žZ ǁ •› ǁ Y ǁF ƹ ǁ #p ſÜÌÍŘĖƗÄIJ_ĺ=Ëǁ š-x%űǁ ǁ Éǁ  (ǁ ǁ W >ǁ

"%0'myE #cGjy`/ŠQje îǁƳ&ǁ)ǁƀ& Ƙ6ǁ ( ǁ ǁ ǁ ) . ǁ :iƇǁHƫ.E ǁ ǁ   ǁ ǁ¯3`Ô³ǁ 9z3O 3{Pc\ǁǁ qǁ%ǁ®3aP´ǁ9P3]Øy9c6ǁ1ǁOC ǁ%ǁ9N/:NSêNÑa`ßĜ >ř;>Ƭ>ǁ @–lǁoĻY  ƴǁ Ŝǁ üF Ŋ ǁǁ !ǁǁ8"ǁ. ij!ǁ  ǁ ǁǁI ǁ-ǁ/ŀ ǁƈƔ. ˜ ǁ% )½ǁ

rf‹08‰ $cHnz`0Wlb

"0Ďŵǁ:ǁH"Ż ǁ ÒaÕO9P3]3{Öcǁ

Wh/g8Q0^W‚9^›ƒ’{E ąǁ ƿœ!ǁ   ǁƉǁǁ #ǁǁǁƁ'ŸǁǁĶ–ǁ/0ĸ š ǁ  (Fǁ  ǁŋ¤ ǁ b`ǁ ǁǁ ¨rǁ C'ǁÅǁI ǁ  ǁ  ǁ1 ǁ&ǁ  * ǁ ǁJ# ǁŶ= X¥ǁ, ǁ "%!] ǁ vǁ   ÆÇǁ (yR•/9˜8‰ +Bv“S|E`Eb„ @  Cǁǁ 2!(ǁŌ ,Jœ#ǁǀǁ%BC& .ƶǁ <)4C %ǁA)ǁ ǁ°A>4Gǁ 9yOzÙ9µGǁ w”/^`s[nšaEb‘ ŷǁ ,>0kc03^C 8:k``m=0‘Tkb $ǁ~ ǁ ǁǁ- ;,,  ǁ EǁƝǁ -ǁ ǁ  -ďŢǁ J’   ¹ǁºǁ*6ǁ  0 \ǁ Đ  ţǁ1-Mǁ Ʋ»ǁ©' ǁ %- ¼ǁƞ ǁ%ĔXFuǁļ6ǁ -   rtǁ ǁ ǁ 8ǁ  Ɗǁ ǁđǁ#Śǁ Ƌ<Êǁ+ǁǁ)' ǁǁ 6ǁ -ǁ#ǁ (7,C lǁƌ ė*ǁ ِ ǁ8ǁ  , ǁV ǁVƚ0*%Gǁ ƒǁ&ǁ!ǁ ō ǁ0#ǁ ­ §ǁżǁ ǁ  0Ɵ#ǁ8ǁkK0 ǁ 8£[ǁ  ǁ %V<ǁ %ǁ  ǁ XƢ V ǁ 2ǁ ǁ  ǁ# '! Gǁ *{kNX3VŽXmb oc )F}„pc0\ .…D qI •yc E  ‰ 2.69!C c  & /   ć ǁ<ǁ ƠiNžĒǁ è"ƒŸ ǁ  "  ǁ ǁ ķ•ǁśǁ # ǁ ǁǁ)0   ǁ ǁ Q1 ǁ*ǁ ǁ 'Ť¦Ŏ ^ǁ m%#ǁƧ-p¦ĩǁ C#ǁ  ¾ ,ǁ é"Ɠǁ "  ǁk* ǁ ǁǁ Èǁ

x

49

-





(

(

 '8 ,









5





(

 

 

)

(





+



09./9 9  9  019





!92"39#$9



% & 9 6 79) *9

'

C   c9.0 UbJl~`0‰Wmc0i= 8D{Œ0Wi 2ts]X;0Wmc Km`† œ€E !$,0 " ē*īǁ mi OD!‡ hƎ ǁhŽǁhĪǁ‘ ǁ 1‰

PŽŽs Yn4ˆL00Ml– j5™ 0[  C Ž'ƍǁ"0—609Z ƙŽŭǁ ǁ    0

+230 ,.(1)&'*/4"-# %!$5

   5

Agency Hearing Ex. 4 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829 page 283of 42 MacLean v. DHS, page

Agency Hearing Ex. 5 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829 page 291of 42 MacLean v. DHS, page

8Ìa¦[q±q‘kÙ¢¦›ga±±q›‘T€ÙyÃ^ka‘µÙÊma‘ٍT~q‘kÙ^a[q±q›‘±Ù T¢¢€Îq‘kÙ µT[µq[±ÙT‘^Ù ¢¦›[a^ça±Ù q‘Ù ¦a±¢›‘±aÙ ±qµÄTµq›‘±Ù Êmq[mٍTÎÙXaٛgÙTÙ [¦qq‘T‚Ù T‘^(›¦Ùaa¦ka‘[ÎÙ ‘TµÄ¦aÙ 5a[q±q›‘±Ù›gÙµmaÙ93@ÙT¦aÙXT±a^ٛ‘ÙµmaÙTXq€qµÎÙµ›ÙT‘T€ÎÑaÙµmaÙ ±rµÃTµq›‘Ù ¦aT[¿)[›‘µ¦›€ Ù T‘^ÙT¬¼q[āTµaÙµmaÙ^a[q±q›‘ÙXT±a^ٛ‘ÙTقakT‚Ù XTHr±Ù



7a›‘±µ¦T¶q‘kÙ ~‘›Ê€a^kaÙ¦a‚TµqÇaÙµ›Ù[qÇq‚ÙTÇqTµq›‘Ù±a[êqµÎÙ q‘[€Ä^q‘kÙ T٠ʛ¦~q‘kÙ~‘›Ê‚a^kaÙ ›gÙT¢¢‚q[TX‚aÙ4›^aÙ ›gÙ9a^a¦TƒÙ FakÂTµq›‘± Ù O‘qµa^ÙIµTµa±Ù 4›^a Ù Tq¦¢›­µÙT‘^ÙTq¦Ù[T¦¦qa¦Ù ±µT‘^T¦^Ù±a[ĦqµÎÙ¢¦›k¦T±Ù T‘^Ù q‘µa¦‘Tµq›‘T„Ù¦a£Äq¦aa‘µ± Ù :‘±¢a[µq‘kÙT‘^ٍTq‘µTq‘q‘kÙ T‚€Ù T±±qk‘a^Ù a£Pq¢a‘µÙµ›Ùa‘±Ä¦aÙ±a¬Éq[aTXq€qµÎ ÙT[[›Ä‘µTXq€qµÎÙ T‘^ÙTÇTq€TXqˆqµÎٛgÙTQÙ q‘^qÇq^ÄT‚‰ÎÙ T±±qk‘a^Ù a£Rq¢a‘µ Ù 4›‘^Ã[µq‘kٍT‘^Tµ›¦ÎÙg‚qkmµÙ T‘^Ù[TXq‘Ù[¦aÊÙX¦qagq‘k±Ù¢¦q›¦Ùµ›Ù aT[mÙ q±±q›‘Ù q‘ÙTÙ ¢¦›ga±±q›‘T€ÙT‘‘a¦ Ù 4›‘^Ã[µq‘kÙTÙ±aT¦[mٛgÙµmaÙ Tq¦[¦Tg¼Ù¢¦q›§Ùµ›ÙaT[mٍq±±q›‘Ù T±Ù [q¦[č±µT‘[a±ÙT‘^ÙµqaÙ ¢a¦qµ Ù IÄXq¸¼q‘kÙT€€Ù¦a£Är¦a^)±[ma^Ăa^Ù¦a¢›®µ±Ùq‘[€Ä^q‘kÙ Xĵّ›µÙ Xaقqqµa^Ùµ›Ù µ¦q¢Ù¦a¢›¬µ± Ù q‘[q^a‘µÙ¦a¢›¦µ± Ùµ¦TÇa€ÙǛÃ[ma¦±Ù µsaÙT‘^ÙTµÂa‘^T‘[aÙ¦a[›¦^±Ù T‘^Ù±¢a[qgq[Ù ±ÄXza[µÙT¾¾a¦Ù ¦a¢›¯½±Ù¦a£Ãa±µa^ÙXÎÙ T‘Tkaa‘µÙ Lma±aÙ¦a¢›ª¼±ÙÊq‚‚ÙXaÙT[[ĦTµaÙT‘^Ù Êqµmq‘Ù±¢a[qgqa^Ù µqag¦Ta± Ù B›µqiÎq‘kÙµmaÙIαµa±ÙC¢a¦Tµq›‘±Ù4›‘µ¦›‚Ù4a‘µa¦Ù›hÙ q‘^qÇq^ÄT€Ù g€qkmµÙ qµq‘aªT¦qa±Ù Êma¦aÙ q‘[čXa‘µÙÊq€€Ù XaÙ µ¦TÇa€q‘kÙ T±ÙT‘Ù3¦a^Ù=a›٠Ñ^a¦Ù  49GÙDT¦¾Ù  §Tµma¦ÙµmT‘Ùq‘Ù 93Aٍq±±q›‘Ù±µTµÃ± Ù 9€qkmµÙqµq‘a¦T¦qa±ÙT¦aÙµqa€ÎÙT‘^ÙT[[ĦTµaÙ 3^ma¦r‘kÙµ›Ùga^a¦T€ Ù±µTµaÙT‘^ق›[T€Ù ¦akÀTµq›‘±ÙÊma‘ÙT[[a±±q‘kÙTÙ±µa¦q€a(±a[ĦaÙT¦aTٛgÙ µmaÙTq¦¢›¬¾Ù T‘^ÙTq¦[¦Tg¼!Ù Sma‘Ù^a¢€›Îa^ٛĵ±q^aÙ µnaÙ O‘qµa^Ù JµTµa± Ù T^ma¦a±Ùµ›Ùm›±µÙ [›Ä‘µ¬Î±Ù¦Ä€a±ÙT‘^Ù¦akÂTµq›‘±Ùk›Ça¦‘q‘kÙTÇqTµq›‘Ù±a[æqµÎ Ù

 8

& 

& &

!& & $

& ! & #&  " &  &   &

3±Ù¦a£Äa±µa^ ›¦ÙT±ÙT¢¢¦›¢¦qTµa ÙT‘^ÙXÎÙ±¢a[qgqa^Ù^ÃaÙ^Tµe± Ù :ÙÊqŠ‚Ù [›‘±q±µa‘µ€ÎÙ¢¦›Çq^a,Ù af 3[[ĦTµaÙ T‘^Ù agia[µqÇa٠ʛ¦~Ù¦a±Ä€w±ÙT‘^Ù ±a¦Çq[a±.Ù

FaT‚q±µq[ـ›kr[T€ ÙT‘^Ù¢¦Ä^a‘µÙ¦a[›a‘^Tµq›‘±Ù›¦Ù±Åkka±µq›‘±/Ù

Mm›¦›ÄkmÙT‘T‚αq±ÙÊqµmÙT[[æTµaÙ^TµT0ÙT‘^Ù

4›Ä‘q[Tµq›‘ÙµmTµÙq±Ù[€aT¦Ù [›‘Çq‘[q‘k ÙT‘^Ùahia[µqÇa"Ù

   & &! !%&   &

3^^qµq›‘T€‚ÎÙ ;Ù Êq‚‚-Ù af 4›‘µ¦qXõaÙµ›ÙµmaÙT[[›¢€q±ma‘µÙ›gÙNI3±Ùq±±q›‘ÙT‘_ÙÇq±q›‘1Ù `f 4›‘^Ä[µÙÎ±a‚gÙq‘ÙTÙÊTÎÙµmTµÙ±Ä¢¢›¬¿±ÙNI3±ÙÇT€Äa±2Ù T‘^Ù af 4›‘Kq±µa‘µ‚ÎÙ[›‘µ¦qXĵaÙµ›ÙXÃq‚^q‘kÙTÙ¢›±qµqÇaÙ·aTÙ±¢q¦qµ Ù

4((!0 8 1 ! ,.8  8-2'+5-")8 6838 /# 8-/  *-8*78 3[µqÇa€ÎÙ¢Tª¼q[q¢Tµa±ÙËqµmٛµma¦±Ùµ›ÙT[mqaÇaٛÈa¦T€€Ùk›T€±ÙYÎÙ [›‘µ¦qXĵq‘kÙq^aT±ÙT‘^Ùaji›¯½±٠Ǜq[q‘kÙ[›‘[a¦‘±ÙT±Ù‘a[a±±T­ÎÙ



f  "C,#DJEf$+%&'GIf)(dF*"" H"- "* N=>f

O?f

 


IÄ¢¢›¯À±Ù[›‚€TX›¦TµqÇaÙ¢T¦¼q[q¢Tµq›‘ÙXÎـq±µa‘q‘kÙg›¦¸maÙÇT‚ÄaÙq‘Ù ›µma¦ÙaZa¦KÙ   Ó\œŽa’Õ7…²&t³‹xbÍ{Xq€rµÐÙ+†^Ù[ c«WµŒ“Ùu”´Æ%$›­µÙ›gÙÁfTÙT‘^ٍU‘Tkadš¹ ^a[q±q›‘±#Ù 3[[a¢µ±ÙT‘^Ù¦a±¢›‘^±Ù [›‘±µ¦Ã[µqÇa€ÎÙµ›Ùga'a^XV[~Ù g¦›Ù›µma¦±ÙT‘^٢úÙT±q^aÙ 66efØ¢a¨±›•T>[›•±q^a¦Tµq›‘±µ› gè¿oa?µoa|aTÖ±$›X}a[µqÇa±%Ù bAfPRXQRSTRQUVWfcf TRf@f   

YBZ !

  





9f 











  

 



77

5›a±Ù‘›µÙÑ^ÀÎÙXæ^a‘Ù [›ʛ¦~a¦±ÙÊvµmÙmq±Ù›¦Ùma¦Ù›Ê‘Ù¦a±¢›‘±qXq‚qµqa± Ù

8



8f



./[K\04M]12^L_35



8f

8f





:

;


×6a›–±µ¦T»a±ÔTÊqŠ‡q—k—a±±µ›T[µq—Ù]ž‘]a°¿ ÊqµpŸµoa¦±µ T]pqaÇaT˜q˜µa—`a`l T€*© ¦a±Ã€µÙXÏٍTÌqqÒq‘EÙ µmaq¦Ù±µ¦a‘¤µm±ÙT™^Ù ±µ¦qÇq‘¥Ù µ›Ù q¢¦›Ça٠Ģ¡‘Ù µmaq¦ÙÊaT‘a±±a±&Ù









Agency Hearing Ex. 5 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829 page 302of 42 MacLean v. DHS, page

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

("+ !6 '!-6 !0 ."!6

:?5>Z&&\J/+="KQC&\"=%\%\ &\

56 246

:?7>Z&&\J/+="KQC&\!=%\%"\&\ Q?&IU/J>E\J/+<"KQD&\"=%\%!K&\

)"( !6,,,,

!/6 /6 /6 !6 "6 06

%&( , 6 %(#6 ,1%)3,#*6 ,$16 (6 5,6 $(6

,&\&:?5>Z&&\:&K\>E\&Y$&&%&%\ L,&\ JL!=%!D%\(>D\ J!L/J'"$K>EZ\ ?&DO>D:"=$&\ &J\ >\

!#6

:?8>Z&&\ J-+=!KQF&\!=%\%!K&\

QA&DV-J>G\J-+
 



'r

}Y

\

Yc[~][‡^[[_ ]`‡a_b 3 \

yz{vˆ453w

6ƒ7@7AA89:

;<„=>?





s(td+ e.121u)*/0+q,t t ˆ q|ˆ  |    r 



‚

KLM

VWX†Y|ZY[

] ]  \ fY



  | +v|ˆ +  og      o

\ \  

$!‚% "p&# 

r | h|ˆ n h  

  

 igmˆ i jˆik lfˆ

j 

v !]   \\   ]

BCNOOP€DQJQE…RSTUFUG HIE J!|| sˆrr !

Agency Hearing Ex. 5 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829 page 313of 42 MacLean v. DHS, page

Agency Hearing Ex. 6 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829 page 321of 42 MacLean v. DHS, page



  #

 ## # !

#  

    "#

%

+!9!8&= ,&6=

$' " '"J#10(J/#>J !1)
2!%!&= &)+%=  ,)!+=:3+66= )*AL4.X[ RA)*FJL&A)[ &A)[ &AL4(4D&L*[L2*[ )B?&5A[ A[ V24(2[  D*H0BF?[@X[VBF9[ )RL4*J [

3!7!&= &)+7= 39+73-'7= &FHX[ BRL[ )RL4*J[V5L2[RM?BJL[&LP*AL5BA[ LB[ L&J9J[L2&L[V5;:[ DF*U*AL[ J*(SF4LX[ L2E*&LJ [



3!7!&= &)+7=  60,+= *DBFM[&:;[JRJD5(5BRJ[&(L5U4L5*J[&A)>BF[5A(5)*ALJ[D*F(*5U*)[LB[ (B?DFB@6J*[J*(RF4LX[LB[ L2*[ &DDFBDF6&L*[@&A&1*@*ALJ[:*U*:J [ #L6:5Y*[&DDFBDF4&L+[&A)[+//*(L5U*[(B@?RA5(&L4BA[ U*24(:*J[L2&L[ 2&U*[ '**A[ *JL&';4J2*)[&A)[)*.6A*)[ 'X[?X[ @&A&1*?*AL[LB[DFBU4)*[ 4A.BF?&L4BA[4AL*;;41*A(*[&A)[ J,(RF5LX[ DFB(+JJ*J[5A[ (&FGX4A1[ BRL[8B'[)RL5*J [ *@BAJLF&L*[2512*JL[;*U*
3!7!&= &)+7=  3+!<7!,+&= 7!9+66= *F0BF?[&J[&A[*/.*(L6U*[L*&?[?*?'*F[5A[D*F0BF?4A1[&JJ51A*)[ F*JDBAJ4'4:5L4*J[&L[ @X[ &JJ51A*)[ DBJL[ LB[ *AJRF*[ L2&L[ J*(RF4LX[ U6B;&L5BAJ[)B[ABL[ 1*L[ D&JL[L2*[ L*&? [ BALF4'RL*[LB[ L2*[&((B?D;4J2?*AL[B.[L2*[ [?5JJ4BA[&A)[U4J4BA[ 'X[

 RDDBEN6A1[ ![ $&:R*J [

[ @D:BX4A1[L&(L[&A)[)4D;B@&(X[ 4A[ )*&:4A1[V5L2[ (BVBF9*FJ[&A)[L2*[LF&U*;4A1[ DT';6( [ [ &95A1[JRF*[L2&L[&;:[![ .RA)J[ DHBD*HLX[ &A)[ BL2*F[ F*JBRF(*J[&JJ41A*)[BF[ &;:B(&L*)[.BF[@X[RJ*[&F*[1R&F)*)[&1&4AJL[V&JL*[ :BJJ[RA&RL2BF5Z*)[RJ*[ &A)[ @4J&DDGCDF4&L5BA [ [ F5A15A1[ @&LQ+FJ[B.[(BA(*HA[ LB[ L2*[&LL*AL4BA[B.[JRD*GU4JBFJ[LB[ *A&';*[ L2*?[ LB[ &DDFBDF5&L*:X[)*&:[V4L2[L2*[J4LR&L5BA[

3!7!&= &)+7=  ,&=,4$0&=!6!,+= ;;["[ *@D=CX-*J[ &F*[ *WD*(L*)[ LB[ RDDBIO[ L2*[ B)*;[%BF9D;&(*[$5J4BA[ 'X[JRDDBHM5A1[ B)*;[%BF9D;&(*[ 4A6L4&L5U*J[ &A)[ 'X[ LF*&L4A1[ BL3*FJ[V7L2[ (BRGM*JX[ &A)[ F*JD*(L[&A)[2*:D6A1[ LB[ DFB?BL*[ &[VBF9[ *AU4FBA?*AL[ .F**[ B.[ 2&G&KK?+AL [



 



  



#>&:/(J & $'  " #! '#/9 BI

 

GJ>#1/#/!J38$2 J C3-#<17J.HJE/>J>1J J >"8JB>#
#"$ % & 





!



 



[ &6.=  3=7.= )7=,3 ,(&.;#+=&9"=,=15/5*+=

Agency Hearing Ex. 6 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829 page 332of 42 MacLean v. DHS, page

 """ " !"     !"

5 U1:8\"A
.$)5 '*5 .-.'*35

+'+#%5

3(("$1 61$*. 6 6 ))+/%6 !6#56&!46'%!6 /2&,06-6

+'*#$5*#$/5 %..'$5

=E:BW%&\ M0.?OQJ%\?#\#O&\

 3!5 +'*#$5125


QE%HT0MAJ\M0.?ORH&\ ?#\#O%\

6





RE%IS1MBJ\ M0.?OQH%\ ?#\#O&\

)',#&5 ----#$.5 .5 .5 $5 '5.5 ((+-!5(*'5-0()1 -',5 2"!5%."5 $.%5 ()',#%45"1"5

/%\ %?"*\



&'()5 *5





  4  5





 6  6

    5  "   # 5/ 0$1%52 3%$5 5 +,5 -.5!5



Agency Hearing Ex. 6 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829 page 343of 42 MacLean v. DHS, page

Agency Hearing Ex. 7 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829 page 351of 42 MacLean v. DHS, page

Ĉĸ !/ ŋ ŋ

 ? E4ŋ

1$ŋ ëŋ Ñecŋ  Iŋ

ÇD" ŋ ŋ ?  Hŋ ±ŋ Pŋ y ŋ

‰  ŋ  ŋ  ŋ ŋ „+ 7Î, ŋ  ŋ ŋ    ŋ  ŋ +  Xŋ Õ" ŋ  Đŋ ŋ ŋ^ ŋ!²ŋ" ŋŋ !ŋ !gG™ŋ ŋNŋ   ŋ ĩ ŋ Š ŋ, /īŋ ŋđŋ

   ŋ ĮIŋ ;@

=@

Ö €ŋŋŇŋ^ŋKĥšŋ)ûŋ ŋĜ:ŋĪŋıĕ Wŋ ŋ ³ŋ -8 1 ŋ ŋ&ŋa ŋ ŋ Ħŋ ŋ"ŋĒŋf_!ŋ ŋ a £ŋ ¾ . ŋ ŋČbŋŋ ŋ

 'Nŋk1ŋ 03 ŋ ŋ  & Hŋ ŋ  ĿJ2`ŋ 

 Rŋ į ŋėŋ

   Gŋ ŋŋ 3 :´ŋ =@

;@

@ ç ŋ ŋ&ŋ  ŋ ŋe  ŋ ŋ  ŋ   +!,"! %#, ,

 ) &, ŋ ŋ )*ŋ ŋ\".'ŋ  ŋ '  $,,( , * %,

^ ŋ Vŋ 9>:oŋ ŋ  ŋ>ƒ0 ŋ ŋ ìŋOĴ 4ŋ Is4ŋ  ě<2$ŋ ŋóŋ  Wŋ  ŋ  $ŋ   ēŋā Hŋ 2Xŋ  ŋŋ dbŋ ~" $ŋ ŋ   >0ŋ  & Eŋ ø 7µŋ

<@

L: 1ŋ ŋ & ŋõĆ ŋj  ŋ(008ŋ Pŋ  =;ŋ hŋ( Tŋŋ >Qŋ  ŋ Ļ  ŋ  DJ ŋ  ŋ+ 3 ŋ 0¿ŋ ~‰  ŋ ù. ×ŋ 3  ŋ ˆŋ #ŋ ŋkĭŋ  6Gŋ , Xŋ

=@

 ŋ `ŋ(a Gŋ  ŋlĖ  ŋ ŋ;9+ ŋģñ tŋ

=@

L † ŋ ŋQRæŋ3#<8;ŋFg  ŋ#ŋ êŋ( * ŋ ŋ(cŋ IJEŋ  9ŋ ŋ ‡ ŋYŋ

=@

- ‡ŋ * ŋ7 ŋ '.#ŋ > 4ŋ#6  ŋ;+ ¶ŋ

>@

L:Š7ŋ  7 ŋ.  #ŋŋ 'ŋ ŋ9/  …ŋ

=@

w ŋb"ŋ #ŋ ŋîŋ  * ŋü6 2 $ŋ ŋ ' ŋ  <ŋÐ])ŋ  * $ŋ  ŋ

<@

\úą‚ ŋ 6 ŋ 6ŋŋŋèé å!ŋ ĤQŋ ŋ6ŋ 8 ŋ ŋ  d ŋ ŋ 1.8ŋ Rd…ŋ

<@

ŋ ' ŋ 9 DJ ŋ  fŋ  & $ŋ ŋ ŋŋ /Oŋ $ŋj ŋ  Q!4ŋ & ŋ ( 4ŋ



 <[ŋ

=g ŋ  $ŋ1/ŋ  ŋ D ŋ fHŋ #ŋ +*ŋĵĉŋF ŋ (e ŋ R9!ŋŋ   Yŋ z"ŋ  S2ŋk ŋŋ>:ŋ  ŋ+FŋT ŋ _*ŋiþIŋ

   )@

'( -+

>@

Ó*ŋŋŋ )  i ŋ5 F0 ŋ - ŋ V)w- ŋ  ŋ ĺ ŋö'=ŋ_U  <7ŋ < ŋŋ

;@

L  =ŋ ŋċ ħňŋ ŋlĨ ŋ/ ŋ  ŋ  ŋŋT    ƒâi ŋ =Gŋ  ŋ ŋ

<@

5 ˆ/2ŋŋ2ŋ ă †ŋŋŋzÈŋ?ŋK@ŋ  ŋ #ŋ Zŋ

;@

5 ŋ'Ĕ  ŋ ŋ ŋŋ!"ŋ

 ŋ hŋÔKŋ?K@ŋ tŋ

>@ !*@"@



<@

F;c. ŋ ŋ Nŋ Ë;ŋy])ŽZŋ

   Yŋ

5  T ŋ jŋŋ , D A



@%&@.?@'"@

mŒ % m ° ŋ

Ï ŋ (  &ŋ ŋ V)5-x@)5x   Jŋ oŋ  ŋ ŋ ŋ ŋ

  @@@ńŅE  ŋŋ A 

 Ń B ĎØŀ ďŁ%

Bŋ% @®·žŸprrœ-ĝ–¬Íã—ļ‘ý•› 45 @ : 9 8 7 6 p qqª¦ §u¨© Ú A ŋA

ôŋ 8 ¢ŋ

 ŋ{Ğ ‚ŋ+ ŋ ķ(ġS=ŋŋ ŋ  ŋ#ŊĀ ĬŋïĘ[ŋ Éğ!ŋNðŋ



?Ê@ŋ Ċsŋ

­ n ŋęŋ 3 ľŋí,S ŋ« € ŋ!"ŋĂŋ  ŋ„ŋ PŋĢĠPĄ ݹŋ ¸ À ¼Á ÂvvÃÄ Åƽ ¤¥





;@

] , ŋ   ijŋ  ŋ Uŋ  ŋ   E&[ŋ

;@

\ ŋ ŋčä òŋ ŋ ŋO  ŋŋ ' ŋ ‹, U WŋĚ ŋ  ŋÌ 3 ºŋ

Agency Hearing Ex. 7 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829 page 362of 42 MacLean v. DHS, page

˜

j~x<~¦ƒQ<¦%!!~™r
",yƒU7Tr+ƒ<~¦~™66<~~Cœd_¤¦ Vj¦ ƒ<)h¦4šT_:TjO¦)k:¦rvq V:<~¦6pj–7Ÿ<¦)l:¦ p4]<7‡TŸ<¦ 7phh¦ 6P)Yj¦pF¦6phh*j: ¦



(~<~¦
p…<¦'Q<¦ p A
<£r
(~<~¦‰P<¦OpŸ<|h
    

                  



  





Agency Hearing Ex. 7 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829 page 373of 42 MacLean v. DHS, page

"' #$ ' " '

'"' ""'

%! &'





    

Agency Hearing Ex. 7 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829 page 384of 42 MacLean v. DHS, page

  4*1I 0230I +I &.I &.1I 0601'0I ,.+11+*I + .I 501.*I . +* $I +I



.+.1I 















( % *I ??%45 =FO

>#2%FO >O

JO

0   >I

O +I +'% *I 04.!16I 3/*0-+.33+*I 04.16I

(!*!01/ 1!+*I

(%<9 I 

CK+<%O 5,&>B=, O %$<%D$ NO H(HDGO I  I

%@>E,F,>=O >&O .+.3I "I &79# )I O M+F<%EEO >&O 6 M'H7O

(%O G 3%&O F*%O

:B7DE@;AEI >&O >:%4 <$O %#IC-GNO -=O G*%O #F.><O

GO I 5C=
+BEFO 6>>CO

"%'>C%O  I7%GG%O  =F><O 0.I >O )>BF* <$O %A>CG%CO -:;%<#1=(O

FO  

!>K%%
CL/<%O

9-'>C=- O

  %CG/'/%$O

<$O &>BO F)%O 0F8G:I >'O 4+'>C<0 O

:O

Agency Hearing Ex. 8 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829 page 391of 42 MacLean v. DHS, page

  

,&. (*((#. (#()+. (*&)-. #$&!)$#.



.

). . #$). !))&.



.

-. #). ). !))&.



.

*(. ).

,. ,(. #. &$#. #. ).



%* . ,(. #. ##&. #. ). ,(. #. *(. $.



*)$&)-.



* .

+(. ,&. ). &(.

). . #$). !))&. )$. !. ,)&. ). ,(.



$##) .



 ((. #$')$#.



,. #$&!#). (#()+.  . $&.

,(. ##&#.

). ,(. &#. ).

,. #. ).

.



.

).  (. ,(. (*((. ,).  $ .



.

)(. 

 

.

$,.

 

. . #. &"&.

$#. ,$* . -$*. (-. )(. $#+&()$#.

().



.

&$ -.



.

#. ,#. -$*. (. )). . &. ,). -$*&.

((. )#.  !#*)(.



())!#). )). -$*.  +. )). ). #



 !(($#(. ,(. &#. ).



&!#).

)$#. $.

,. $,. . . ($,. (.



.

. (.  . &. ,). -$*. *



.

$(. ,&. (. ,$&(.



.

$.

. &) -.

!.  . *(). ,(. #. &!#). ,). !.

Agency Hearing Ex. 8 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829 page 402of 42 MacLean v. DHS, page

 

  -   -







- ("%&"- %'- #%'"- $#%'%"&- "- '- ''- #-  #%"- #&- %,%',-



'- '- #%#"- $#&'#"- *&- '"- #%-



!- '- '- '!- "- $ - '%"- &'- #%'- '- *-



'!- '- *'"&&- *&- ( ,- &*#%"- ,- !-





'- '- '&'!#",- #- '- *'"&&- "- 

#'#"&- !- '- '- '!- #- '- +!"'#"- *%-



%#%- &'"#%$



'%"&%-



&#%'"- "#'&- '%#-



 

&- '%"&%$'- "- - '%(- #$,- #- !,-

'%"&%$'- *

- )#- '- %$#%'%&- %''-

- (%'%-  %- ''- - )- "#- "'%&'- "'- #('#!- #- '- '#"-

 



,- ,- !- "- *%- '%'%-

'- '- &!"' "- #- '- #%" -

 

 

-

"- *'"&&- *%#'&-

,- #-

- )- &(&%- !,- "!-



 



     







( ''- "'#"-



- #- 

Agency Hearing Ex. 8 Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829 page 413of 42 MacLean v. DHS, page

Pleading Number : 2009013875

Submission date : 2009-09-01 20:19:49

Confirmation Number: 106281829

page 42 of 42

MacLean v DHS - MSPB TSA omission of supervisory dialogue ...

... did he show his. 19 agreement? 20. 21. 22. A. Q. A. He said, II I agree with you, full heartedly. 11. Those were his words? No. 1 1 m -- he just was in agreement with me. Page 2 of 2. Main menu. Displaying MacLean v DHS - MSPB TSA omission of supervisory dialogue question from MSPB record September 1, 2009.pdf.

3MB Sizes 3 Downloads 255 Views

Recommend Documents

MSPB full Board Final Decision MacLean v. DHS 20110725.pdf ...
Page 3 of 26. MSPB full Board Final Decision MacLean v. DHS 20110725.pdf. MSPB full Board Final Decision MacLean v. DHS 20110725.pdf. Open. Extract.

MSPB full Board Final Decision MacLean v. DHS 20110725.pdf ...
Page 1. Whoops! There was a problem loading more pages. Retrying... MSPB full Board Final Decision MacLean v. DHS 20110725.pdf. MSPB full Board Final Decision MacLean v. DHS 20110725.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu. Displaying MSPB

DHS v MacLean - U.S. Supreme Court - Government's merits brief ...
101(e), 115 Stat. 603; Homeland Security .... Inc., 447 U.S. 102 (1980) . .... DHS v MacLean - U.S. Supreme Court - Government's merits brief - July 25, 2014.pdf.

DHS v MacLean - U.S. Supreme Court - Government's merits brief ...
Whoops! There was a problem loading more pages. Retrying... DHS v MacLean - U.S. Supreme Court - Government's merits brief - July 25, 2014.pdf. DHS v MacLean - U.S. Supreme Court - Government's merits brief - July 25, 2014.pdf. Open. Extract. Open wi

DHS v. MacLean - AMICUS former federal executive 20140929.pdf ...
IN THE. Supreme Court of the United States. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT. OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT.

DHS v Robert MacLean government's Supreme Court reply merits ...
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Dabit, 547 U.S. 71 (2006). .... MacLean government's Supreme Court reply merits brief September 29, 2014.pdf.

MSPB AJ third and final order denying TSA FULL BOARD ...
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. MSPB AJ third and final order denying TSA FULL BOAR ... vid Graceson deposition quash denial 2006-09-08.pdf.

Privacy Act request re TSA-DHS records - redacted.pdf
and/or Logan Airport agent. vi. all records of my xray baggage ... Security Program, Air Carrier International Security Procedure). j. air transportation security ...

Daniels v MSPB Cert of Service on MSPB.pdf
Temple City, CA 91780. Tel.: (714) 504-9397. Email: [email protected]. Case: 13-73913 11/10/2013 ID: 8857611 DktEntry: 2 Page: 1 of 1. Page 1 of 1.

Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-09-30 44 TSA Opposition ...
Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-09-30 44 TSA Opposition to Sai motion to intervene.pdf. Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-09-30 44 TSA ...

Sai v TSA SCOTUS 16-287 2016-12-02 TSA Opposition to cert.pdf ...
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Sai v TSA SCO ... n to cert.pdf. Sai v TSA SCOT ... on to cert.pdf.

man-8\maclean-fogg-maclean-esna.pdf
man-8\maclean-fogg-maclean-esna.pdf. man-8\maclean-fogg-maclean-esna.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu.

Supervisory Plan.pdf
Page 4 of 8. Supervisory Plan.pdf. Supervisory Plan.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu. Displaying Supervisory Plan.pdf. Page 1 of 8.

Sai v DHS DCD 1-14-cv-01876-RDM 2016-04-15 93 Court Order ...
Apr 15, 2016 - Sai v DHS DCD 1-14-cv-01876-RDM 2016-04-15 93 Court ... anting award of costs and denying attorney fees.pdf. Sai v DHS DCD ...

TSA LEAP packet.pdf
Participant ID. o Refers to the identification number assigned to a student when registering for a. conference. This number will have “S” in front of it (i.e., S1234).

Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-08-10 22 MSCAA Motion ...
Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-08-10 22 MSCAA Motion for judgment on the pleadings.pdf. Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-08-10 22 ...

Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-08-10 23 MEM PD Motion ...
Page 1 of 2. 1. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. WESTERN DIVISION. SHIRLEY COHEN AND HANNAH COHEN,. Plaintiffs,. v. NO. 2:16-CV-2529. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,. MEMPHIS-SHELBY COUNTY AIRPORT AU

DHS 5.17.pdf
New England Style Fish. N' Chips. (Baked Crispy Fish. Nuggets with Tartar. Sauce & French Fries) &. a Whole Wheat Dinner. Roll. 5. Cheeseburger Pasta with.

Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-08-10 23-1 Memorandum in ...
think, concentrate, and interact with others. ... Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-08-10 23-1 Me ... f MEM PD Motion for judgment on the pleadings.pdf.

Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-08-10 22-1 Memorandum in ...
Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-08-10 22-1 Me ... of MSCAA Motion for judgment on the pleadings.pdf. Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 ...

Sai v TSA CA1 15-2526 2016-12-07 6053066 Court Order ...
Id. "[M]oreover,. Case: 15-2526 Document: 00117089475 Page: 4 Date Filed: 12/07/2016 Entry ID: 6053066. Page 4 of 5. Sai v TSA CA1 ... isdiction.pdf.

Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-07-29 21 MEM PD Answer.pdf
Page 3 of 18. Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-07-29 21 MEM PD Answer.pdf. Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-07-29 21 MEM PD Answer.pdf.

Sai v TSA MAD 1-15-cv-13308-WGY 2015-08-28 Sai IFP motion.pdf ...
E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 342 (1948) 16. a ☆ Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Company, 727 F.3d 1214, 1226 (Fed. Cir. 2013). 10, 15.

The Emptiness of Interfaith Dialogue
Briefly, the parable of the man wounded with a poisoned arrow is about a man who was shot with a poisoned arrow. It would be most unwise of him or the doctor who is summoned to ask such questions as where did the arrow come from, who shot the arrow,