50% Feasibility Study Feedback Forum January 12, 2016 Medfield Elementary School Who are you? (Please select one): _____ Parent

_____ Student

_____ Principal

_____ School Staff

_____ Teacher

_____ Community Member (please specify): ___________________________________ _____ Agency Rep (Name of agency): ____________________________________________ _____ Other (please specify): ____________________________________________

Please provide us with feedback on Feasibility Study options #1-3 return to City Schools staff at the end of the meeting. Option 1:

Draft: Subject to change

Below includes pros and cons from the architect, please feel free to add additional comments

Pros/Likes  Utilizes existing building  Close proximity to play areas is maintained  Provides separate community space allowing securing of the school  Parks and Rec’s land will not altered during construction

Cons/dislikes  Inadequate amount of space for all requirements of the educational specifications (50,000 SF shortcoming)  Does not address site specific circulation issues – parking and pedestrian  Security concerns from unattached buildings

Additional feedback:

Option 2A:

Draft: Subject to change

Below includes pros and cons from the architect, please feel free to add additional comments

Pros/Likes

Cons/dislikes

Additional feedback:

Option 2b:

Draft: Subject to change

Below includes pros and cons from the architect, please feel free to add additional comments

Pros/Likes    

Utilizes existing building Option 2a – Provides separate parent and bus drop off Option 2a – Provides off street parking Option 2b – Provides off street parent and bus drop off

Cons/dislikes  

Onsite development limited by one story existing footprint. Option 2b - Parking needs are not met – requires continued use of off-site parking.

 

Provides separate community space access allow securing of the school Provides natural lighting to all instructional spaces



Does not provide optimal adjacencies of educational spaces

Additional feedback:

Option 3:

Draft: Subject to change

Below includes pros and cons from the architect, please feel free to add additional comments

Pros/Likes  Provides optimal orientation for daylighting of instructional spaces

Cons/dislikes  Encroaches onto Parks & Recreation’s property  Requires grading hillside

    

Optimal arrangement of instructional spaces Best potential for future expansion Provides separate bus and parent drop offs Optimal adjacencies of educational spaces Provides separate community space allowing securing of the school

Additional feedback:



Main parking lot remote from main entrance