( RATLWAY BOARD )

'\]r"2.'* Rail Bhawan,New Delhi- 11000i,.dated: 17.12.2013

No.2013/E(LR)IY1/ 15 Part-6

TheGeneralSecretary,

The GeneralSecretary, AIRF, 4, StateEntry Road, NewDelhi- 110055.

wFI& 3, ChelmsfordRoad, NewDelhi- 110055.

DearSirs, Sub: Record Note of Discussionsheld on27.092013betweenBoard (MS and FC) and the Staff Side on recommendationsof the $int Committeeconstitutedto study the Career Progressionand Packagefor Trackmen ; percentagedistribution of posts of Track Maintainersreg '

.'....,::' . =.... l

'.; lt1

::::.:=

*;_

sn the abonefientioned subjectis sent Record Note of Discussionsheld on 27.09.2013 herewith. ',liii :-:,.'

';;:'

Yoursfaithfully,

ww fh

D.A.:As above.

r+'1i

:i:l:r,'

(Naveen Kumar) j ' Deputy Director, Estt.(LR)I]

:.;:i

RailwayBoard

.::::::::::.

::::r:::::=

Copyto:

,

.

1.PSOA4Sfor informationof MS. 2.PPS/FCfor informationof FC. 3. AM(Staf$.

4. AM(CE)

5. EDCE(G)

National Federation of Indian Railwaymen (N.F,!.R) 3, Chelmsford Road, New Delhi. No.IV/Committee (Track Men)/2010/Pt.il

6.EDE(rR)

Dt:78-12-2013

Copy forwarded to the General Secretariesof ZonalUnions of NFIR. C/: File No. 1/2010(PNM) C/: File No.2/2010(DC) C/: Media Centre/NFIR.

sf.t-{, ' *-l (M.Raghavaiah) General Secretary

__-:!5q!

i. Ji tf

'. '''fl - f , a

i

L{

No;2013IE(LRXI/1/15 Parr-6 Record Note of Discussions held on 27.09.2013between Board (MS and FC) and the staff 'si'leon fecommindations of the Joint c";;;;e co.rsatut.Jl-o-st\idy the Career progression and Pachge f9r Trackmen - percentagedistribu,tion posts of rraJk Maintain-ersr.e?. 9f The following officers and representativesofFderations (AIRF and NFIR): StaffSide

uilrcrat side

1. Shd SubodhJain,MS -: 2. ShriRajendraKashyap,FC 3. Shd SureshKumarSeth,AM(StafD 4. Shri Alok Kumar,EDCE(G) 5. Smt.RaginiYechury,EDE(IR) 6. ShriDebashisMallik, DE(IR)

AIRF'

1. ShriS.G.Mishra GeneralSecretary

NFIR 1. Shri M. Raghavaiah, GeneralSecretarv

mentionedthatthereis acutestagnation amongst

ryclg{gtions qadre.Thereareiasei where theTrackmen ; f;;;kd

is superannu"ti"g *ittoui*y

pr#ff;.

The Federationsstressedthat it is absolutely'riecessarythat the cadre is revised in the ratio of 7Q:20:20:50as was unanimously agreedand ricomnienola by the roi"t I Co*111iur.. Board (FC) statedthat the cadre structureas recommendediy tfr. Committee if agreedand implemented will result in double or even triple jump in cenain cases which may not be administratively desirable. However, considering the-Federations, contention about the iarbships faced by th: Tryckmen category, revision ii percentage ttre !9i"e distribution in Track Maintainerru & Track Maintainer-rV categories may be considered. The General Secretaries of the Federationshowever raised strong objection on this suggestionand insisted that revision is very essentialin the higher gradesofthe cadrei.e. Track Mainiainer-I & Track Maintainer-tr. . Addl' Mem-ber(Sta0 intervened and stated that as was suggestedin the CRC meeling, a viable solution at this junchre would be to considerrevising the per#ntage distributioa of the cadre of Track Maintainersin the ratio of 6:12:22:60in lieu of thi existingZ:aizn:zt. Board (FC) agreed to this suggestion. Although the Federationsinsisted for the percentageof disfibution as per recommendation of the Joint Committee especially for La% b Track vtaintainer Grade-I, but rtnally it was that presently 6% (six percent) may be given to Track Maintainer - I category and after 2 (two)"grr;J years to dateof approvalcommunicatedby Board (17.05.2012),this percentage would againbe reviewed upwardly. It was agreedto processthe matteraccordingly. :Frt *:F