C. R. Geoscience 342 (2010) 204–214

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Comptes Rendus Geoscience www.sciencedirect.com

Geochemistry

Duration and synchroneity of the largest negative carbon isotope excursion on Earth: The Shuram/Wonoka anomaly Dure´e et synchronisme de la plus grande excursion ne´gative terrestre des isotopes du carbone : l’anomalie Shuram/Wonoka Erwan Le Guerroue´ * Geosciences-Rennes (UMR6118 du CNRS), 263, avenue du General-Leclerc, CS 74205, 35042 Rennes cedex, France

A R T I C L E I N F O

A B S T R A C T

Article history: Received 26 September 2008 Accepted after revision 7 December 2009 Available online 12 March 2010

Carbonate d13C values provide a useful monitor of changes in the global carbon cycle because they can record the burial ratio of organic to carbonate carbon. The most pronounced isotope excursions in the geologic record occur during the Neoproterozoic and have assumed a central role in the interpretation of biogeochemical events preceding the Ediacaran and Cambrian radiations. The most profound negative carbon isotope excursion is best recorded in the Ediacaran-aged Shuram Formation of Oman and has potential equivalents worldwide including the Wonoka Formation of South Australia and other sections in China, India, Siberia, Canada, Scandinavia and Brazil. All these excursions are less well understood than those in the Phanerozoic because of their unusual magnitude, long duration (> 1 Ma) and the difficulty in correlating Neoproterozoic basins to confirm independently that they do indeed record global change in the mixed ocean reservoir. Alternatively, these d13C anomalies could reflect diachronous diagenetic processes. Currently none of these excursion are firmly time constrained and critical to their interpretation is a coherent reproducibility and synchroneity at the global ocean scale. Here we use available strontium isotope record as an independent chronometer to test the timing and synchroneity of the Shuram d13C and its potential equivalents. The use of the 86 Sr/87Sr ratio allows the reconstruction of a coherent, global d13C record calibrated independently against time. The calibrated d13C curve indicates that the Shuram negative anomaly spans several tens of millions of years and reaches values below 10%. This carbon isotopic anomaly therefore represents a meaningful oceanographic event that fundamentally challenges our understanding of the carbon cycle as defined in the Phanerozoic. ß 2010 Acade´mie des sciences. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Presented by Vincent Courtillot Keywords: Strontium isotopes Carbon isotope Neoproterozoic Ediacaran Shuram Wonoka

R E´ S U M E´

Mots cle´s : Isotopes du strontium Isotope du carbone Ne´oprote´rozoı¨que E´diacaran Shuram Wonoka

Les valeurs du d13C mesure´es dans les carbonates marins permettent de suivre les variations du cycle du carbone a` l’e´chelle mondiale, en te´moignant de l’enfouissement du carbone carbonate´ par rapport au carbone organique. Dans l’enregistrement ge´ologique, les excursions isotopiques les plus prononce´es sont observe´es au Ne´oprote´rozoı¨que. Ces excursions ont joue´ un roˆle pre´ponde´rant dans l’interpre´tation des e´ve´nements bioge´ochimiques et coı¨ncident avec les radiations e´diacariennes et cambriennes. La plus

* Present address: Beicip-Franlab, 232, avenue Napole´on-Bonaparte, PO Box 213, 92502 Rueil-Malmaison, France. E-mail address: [email protected]. 1631-0713/$ – see front matter ß 2010 Acade´mie des sciences. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.crte.2009.12.008

E. Le Guerroue´ / C. R. Geoscience 342 (2010) 204–214

205

prononce´e des excursions ne´gatives du d13C est enregistre´e a` l’E´diacarien dans la Formation de Shuram en Oman. Cette excursion a des e´quivalents potentiels sur diffe´rents fragments continentaux, tels que la Formation de Wonoka en Australie du Sud. Ces excursions ne´gatives demeurent plus complique´es a` interpre´ter que leur e´quivalent Phane´rozoı¨que en raison de leur amplitude inhabituelle, de leur longue dure´e (> 1 Ma) et de la difficulte´ a` corre´ler les bassins ne´oprote´rozoı¨ques de fac¸on inde´pendante. Ces corre´lations sont pourtant indispensables pour confirmer un changement global du d13C du re´servoir oce´anique mixte global. Au contraire, ces excursions pourraient refle´ter des processus diage´ne´tiques diachroniques. Ve´rifier la cohe´rence, la reproductibilite´ et le synchronisme a` l’e´chelle globale de ces excursions constitue un test critique de leur ve´racite´. Ici, nous utilisons l’enregistrement isotopique du strontium en tant que chronome`tre inde´pendant, pour tester le synchronisme du signal du d13C de la Formation de Shuram et de ses e´quivalents potentiels. L’utilisation du rapport 86Sr/87Sr permet de composer une variation globale, cohe´rente et contrainte dans le temps. Les re´sultats montrent que l’anomalie ne´gative du d13C s’e´tend sur plusieurs dizaines de millions d’anne´es, atteignant des valeurs infe´rieures a` 10 %. Cette anomalie composite du d13C repre´sente donc un e´ve´nement oce´anographique primaire qui remet profonde´ment en question la compre´hension du cycle du carbone telle qu’elle est de´finie dans le Phane´rozoı¨que. ß 2010 Acade´mie des sciences. Publie´ par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits re´serve´s.

1. Introduction There is widespread interest in the Neoproterozoic period of the Earth’s history (1000 to 542 Ma) because of seemingly unprecedented environmental fluctuations. Many believe these environmental perturbations to be responsible for the changing conditions in the biosphere that facilitated the radiation of metazoan life (animals) towards the end of the Neoproterozoic (Fike et al., 2006; Kennedy et al., 2006; Knoll and Caroll, 1999; Peltier et al., 2007) (Fig. 1). The carbon isotopic record of ancient ocean water preserved in marine carbonates serves as an important means to recognize changes in the exogenic cycle coincident with these evolutionary events (Knoll et al., 1986; Magaritz, 1991; Peltier et al., 2007; Schidlowski and Aharon, 1992). The Neoproterozoic d13C record shows several unprecedented fluctuations (Halverson et al., 2005; Le Guerroue´ et al., 2006c; Shields and Veizer, 2002) (Fig. 1) with implications especially interesting in the Ediacaran interval (635–542 Ma), during which atmospheric oxygen concentrations were likely to have been particularly dynamic (Bartley and Kah, 2004; Rothman et al., 2003) (Fig. 1), ultimately stabilizing closer to modern levels (Canfield and Teske, 1996; Kah et al., 2004). A step to higher oxygen concentration is widely believed to be a necessary condition for multicellularity and metazoan evolution (Anbar and Knoll, 2002; Kennedy et al., 2006; Knoll and Walter, 1992) and to be important in determining the timing of the first animals in the fossil record. The most negative d13C excursion in the Neoproterozoic (e.g. the ‘‘Shuram/Wonoka Excursion’’ (Le Guerroue´ et al., 2006c); Fig. 1) fundamentally challenges the standard understanding of isotopic mass balance as established in the modern ocean (Broecker and Peng, 1982). The long time scale required by the stratigraphic complexity of the excursion, largely longer than the residence time of carbon in the ocean is 105 y, implies that these strongly negative isotopic values (below 10%) record a sustainable steady state condition in the global ocean. This contrasts sharply

with the rare, short-lived, excursions of only  4% accepted in the Phanerozoic (Hayes et al., 1999; Veizer et al., 1999; Zachos et al., 2001) (Fig. 1). These Phanerozoic excursions have been used as evidence only for transient (short term) global ecosystem disruptions while large negative values recorded in Phanerozoic carbonates, have been interpreted as diagenetic alteration (see good example in Swart and Eberli, 2005, and being the product of processes not constrained by the global isotopic mass balance. Such processes are typically diachronous events in restricted basins associated to particular facies of nonsurface marine origin or pervasive platform scale diagenetic alteration (Table 1). Ultimately, most Neoproterozoic comprehensive correlations (for example, Halverson et al., 2005; Walter et al., 2000) are constructed using exclusively d13C variation pattern. In absence of calibrated biostratigraphy (Precambrian) and due to the paucity of radiometric age determinations, these excursions are assumed to be primary in nature and hence globally synchronous. It is important to realize that no independent time chronometer validates the general pattern in Fig. 1 and correlations solely made on d13C variations could be circular (Frauenstein et al., 2009). Considering this paucity of absolute calibration in the Neoproterozoic we propose to use the 87 Sr/86Sr ratio as an independent chronometer to better time constrain these Ediacaran d13C excursions and to test their global coherence and consequently their veracity. 2. d13C excursions The Ediacaran period d13C record is widely believed to be the witness of three profound negative excursions corresponding to the Marinoan cap carbonates, the Shuram/ Wonoka anomaly and the Precambrian/Cambrian boundary (Corsetti and Hagadorn, 2000; Halverson et al., 2005; Jiang et al., 2003a; Knoll et al., 2004; Le Guerroue´ et al., 2006c). The most profound and enigmatic Shuram/Wonoka anomaly attaining a 12% nadir is repeated in numerous places along correlative strata throughout the basin suggesting a

E. Le Guerroue´ / C. R. Geoscience 342 (2010) 204–214

206

Fig. 1. d13C compilation (A: after (Shields and Veizer, 2002)) throughout Earth history and Neoproterozoic composed from different continental fragments (B: modified from (Halverson et al., 2005)). Note major d13C signal fluctuations during the Neoproterozoic. Detailed Ediacaran d13C record from section in Oman (C (Le Guerroue´ et al., 2006c)), Siberia (D (Pokrovskii et al., 2006)) and Australia (E (Calver, 2000)). Note pattern reproducibility throughout the thick sedimentary packages but the absence of radiometric or biostratigraphic ages to support definite correlation. Key is H: Hadash; MB: Masirah Bay; Kh: Khufai; Npz: Neoproterozoic; Phanero: Phanerozoic. Oman radiometric age constraints after Bowring et al., 2007. Fig. 1. E´volution du signal d13C (A : d’apre`s (Shields and Veizer, 2002)) au cours de l’histoire terrestre (et spe´cifiquement le Ne´oprote´rozoı¨que), compile´e a` partir de l’enregistrement sur diffe´rents fragments continentaux (B : modifie´ de (Halverson et al., 2005)). Les fluctuations majeures du signal d13C sont observe´es au Ne´oprote´rozoı¨que. De´tails de l’enregistrement d13C E´diacarien en Oman (C : (Le Guerroue´ et al., 2006c)), Sibe´rie (D : (Pokrovskii et al., 2006)) et Australie (E : (Calver, 2000)). Le signal apparaıˆt reproductible a` travers d’e´paisses se´ries se´dimentaires, mais aucune contrainte radiome´trique ou biostratigraphique ne valide ces corre´lations. Le´gende : H : Hadash ; MB : Masirah Bay ; Kh : Khufai ; Npz : Ne´oprote´rozoı¨que ; Phanero : Phane´rozoı¨que. ˆ ges radiome´triques d’apre`s Bowring et al., 2007. A

Table 1 Minimum 87Sr/86Sr values from literature at the Precambrian/Cambrian boundary (P - ) and the Marinoan Cap Carbonate stratigraphic interval for individual basin. Data source is in Table S1, Supplementary data. Averaged values allow defining an average Ediacaran trend for 87Sr/86Sr variation. See discussion in text. Tableau 1 Valeurs minimales du 87Sr/86Sr a` la limite Pre´cambrienne Cambrienne (P - ) et de la Cap Carbonate marinoenne, disponible dans la litte´rature pour chaque bassin. Donne´es originales issues du Tableau S1, Mate´riel suplpe´mentaire. La moyenne de ces valeurs permet de de´finir la variation moyenne du 87Sr/86Sr durant l’Ediacarien. Voir discussion.

P - values Cap Carbonate values Edicaran total variation Variation rate per Myr

Oman

China

India

Siberia

Australia

Canada

Namibia

Mongolia

Brazil

Average

0.70901 0.70842 0.00058 6.25E-06

0.70968 0.70775 0.00193 2.08E-05

0.70950 No data – –

0.70820 0.70730 0.00091 9.75E-06

0.70880 No data – –

No data 0.70732 – –

0.70852 0.70767 0.00085 9.17E-06

0.70872 0.70719 0.00152 1.64E-05

0.70890 0.70744 0.00146 1.57E-05

0.70891 0.70758 0.00121 1.3E-05

primary origin of the values (Burns and Matter, 1993; Cozzi et al., 2004b; Fike et al., 2006; Le Guerroue´ et al., 2006a; Le Guerroue´ et al., 2006c). Furthermore detailed studies in the upper Shuram Formation of Oman proved the stratigraphic coherence of 10% d13C values at the scale of a few parasequences (Le Guerroue´ et al., 2006b), or failed to support a diagenetic overprint (Fike et al., 2006; Le Guerroue´

et al., 2006a; Le Guerroue´ and Cozzi, in press; Le Guerroue´ and Kennedy, 2007). The Shuram/Wonoka as a primary oceanographic excursion hypothesis is furthermore supported by the presence of large negative excursions located on different continental fragments during the Ediacaran period (Fig. 1, Table S1, Supplementary data). The hypothesis requires a coherent synchroneity of all these potential

E. Le Guerroue´ / C. R. Geoscience 342 (2010) 204–214

equivalent anomalies. To support this, there are, to date, no robust age constraints on any of these excursions, with the exception of the end of the Doushantuo anomaly (China) at ca. 551 Ma (Condon et al., 2005) and subsidence ages on the Shuram Formation of Oman bracketing the excursion between ca. 600 and 550 Ma (Le Guerroue´ et al., 2006c). Alternatively the Marinoan cap carbonate excursion and the Precambrian/Cambrian boundary are better time constraint by (bio) stratigraphic and/or lithofacies arguments and a few radiometric ages at 635 and 542 Ma respectively (Amthor et al., 2003; Condon et al., 2005; Halverson et al., 2005; Hoffmann et al., 2004; Knoll et al., 2004). Strongly negative Neoproterozoic d13C excursions (Fig. 1) are currently subject to debate regarding their origin as a primary oceanographic signal (Frauenstein et al., 2009; Le Guerroue´ and Cozzi, in press). They could imply the oxidation of an extraordinary large dissolved organic carbon reservoir (Fike et al., 2006; Peltier et al., 2007; Rothman et al., 2003) over few millions of years (a few hundred times the duration of the carbon cycle) that is required by the complex stratigraphy of those formations. An organic carbon reservoir oxidation hypothesis for this data has a significant implication for the carbon cycle but however remains a non-steady state reallocation of carbon. It is essential to critically test the global reproducibility and synchroneity of the Shuram/Wonoka to first support a primary excursion hypothesis before attempting robust explanations. 3. Strontium isotopes The strontium isotope ratio for carbonate rocks reflects the relative contribution of strontium to the ocean from continental weathering and from hydrothermal activity along mid-oceanic ridges (Veizer, 1989). The 87Sr/86Sr ratio of seawater is very uniform on a global scale, which is an expression of the long oceanic residence time of Sr (3–5 Ma), combined with a relatively short (< 1000 years) oceanic mixing rate (Peterman et al., 1970; Veizer and Compston, 1974). 87Sr/86Sr is a strong, independent chemostratigraphic tool for making correlations and indirect age assignments especially useful in the Neoproterozoic given the absence of biostratigraphy and paucity of radiometric ages in the fragmentary stratigraphic records (Frauenstein et al., 2009; Halverson et al., 2007; Knoll, 2000; Knoll and Walter, 1992). The general pattern that has emerged for the Neoproterozoic 87 Sr/86Sr curve is one of very low ratios (< 0.7060) early in the era, gradually increasing values in the middle of the Neoproterozoic, and a large monotonic increase to values greater than 0.7085 during the Ediacaran period (Halverson et al., 2007; Prokoph et al., 2008) and references therein. 87 Sr/86Sr data is subject to diagenetic processes but it is not the intention of this manuscript to review the diagenetic overprint of each datasets used here. Readers are referred to original publications were diagenetic issues have been properly addressed. For the purpose of this study, minimum 87 Sr/86Sr values in each set of data are given most credit and it is assumed that they most closely resemble coeval seawater (Frauenstein et al., 2009). The used dataset generally presents Mn/Sr ratio well below 10. 87Sr/86Sr values are not expected to vary from basin to basin as open

207

ocean basins largely buffer continental inputs. Variations in dataset are therefore most likely representative of diagenetic interpretation. This issue will be addressed by defining an average Ediacaran trend and apply a correction to each individual basin (see method section). 4. Summary of datasets 4.1. Oman Oman presents a rather complete stratigraphy (no significant time break is recognized; Fig. 1C) from the deposition of the Hadash Formation cap carbonate Marinoan in age (constrained by detrital zircon population to be < 645 Ma; (Allen, 2007; Bowring et al., 2007; Le Guerroue´ et al., 2005)) up to the Precambrian/Cambrian boundary recently defined in Oman’s subsurface (U/Pb on ash bed (Amthor et al., 2003)). Further detrital zircons populations combined with basinal thermal subsidence analyses constrain the base of the Shuram Formation ( 600 Ma) and middle Buah Formation baring the end (( 550) of the negative d13C Shuram excursion (Le Guerroue´ et al., 2006c). The isotopic record (d13C and 87Sr/86Sr; Table S1, Supplementary data) is very complete throughout the Ediacaran period and repeated in numerous sections (Fig. 2 (Burns et al., 1994; Burns and Matter, 1993; Cozzi et al., 2004b; Cozzi et al., 2004a; Fike et al., 2006; Le Guerroue´ et al., 2006b; Le Guerroue´ et al., 2006a; Le Guerroue´ et al., 2006c) and references therein). Oman is to date probably the best chemostratigraphically illustrated and completed Ediacaran succession and represents a robust frame to be tested against other worldwide sections. 4.2. China The Doushantuo Formation of China presents basin wide a quite heterogeneous isotope record bounded by two significant sequence boundaries dissecting the isotope record (see Condon et al., 2005; Ohno et al., 2008; Yang et al., 1999; Zhu et al., 2007 and reference therein). However, the Feidatian–Dongdahe section (Chengjiang, eastern Yunnan province; (Zhu et al., 2007)) records a d13C pattern very similar to the Shuram of Oman. China’s negative d13C excursion is constrained to happen during the 551– 576  14 Ma period (Chen et al., 2004; Condon et al., 2005) and after 599  4 Ma (Barfod et al., 2002). The overlaying Dengying Formation presents the Precambrian/Cambrian boundary associated with a complex Ediacaran fauna (Zhu et al., 2007). Further 87Sr/86Sr values obtained by Ling et al., 2007 on the Doushantuo and Dengying Formations which are centered around 0.71 are not included in this study as they are much higher than other Ediacaran aged ones (Ling et al., 2007), reflecting potential diagenetic issues, or restriction from the global ocean (Table S1, Supplementary data). 4.3. India The Krol Formation of the lesser Himalaya of northern India presents a highly variable d13C record (Table S1, Supplementary data (Kaufman et al., 2006)) along its carbonate ramp (Jiang et al., 2002). Only a sparse 87Sr/86Sr

208

E. Le Guerroue´ / C. R. Geoscience 342 (2010) 204–214

Fig. 2. Chemostratigraphic data (d13C and 87Sr/86Sr; Table 1) for each continental fragment compiled from literature and plotted against calibrated time axis assuming ca. 635 Ma for the cap carbonate and ca. 542 Ma for the Precambrian/Cambrian boundary. Only d13C values associated with 87Sr/86Sr measurements in similar stratigraphic interval are represented on diagrams. Solid grey line represents the complete available d13C record pattern (includes data points not coupled with 87Sr/86Sr values). Dashed black line represents well-recognized significant stratigraphic breaks. Radiometric ages are given when available and discussed in the text. Average Ediacaran tie points calculated from all sections (Table 1) are given as well as the average Ediacaran trend that serves as a variation template (dashed grey line: Av. E.). D represents the basinal individual 87Sr/86Sr variation from the average Ediacaran trend. See method section. Note the general rise of 87Sr/86Sr values throughout the Ediacaran. Fig. 2. Donne´es chimiostratigraphiques (d13C et 87Sr/86Sr ; Tableau 1) pour chaque fragment continental. Ces valeurs, issues de la litte´rature, sont rapporte´es au temps, conside´rant un aˆge de ca. 635 Ma pour la « cap carbonate » et ca. 542 Ma pour la limite Pre´cambrien/Cambrien. Seules les valeurs d13C associe´es aux valeurs 87Sr/86Sr dans un meˆme intervalle stratigraphique sont repre´sente´es sur ces diagrammes. Les lignes grises repre´sentent l’ensemble de l’enregistrement d13C disponible (incluant les points non couple´s a` des valeurs 87Sr/86Sr). Les lignes noires pointille´es repre´sentent les hiatus stratigraphiques clairement identifie´s. Les aˆges radiome´triques fournis sont discute´s dans le texte. Les points d’ancrage e´diacariens moyens sont calcule´s a` partir de toutes les sections (Tableau 1) et la variation moyenne e´diacarienne sert de re´fe´rence pour l’inter-comparaison (ligne grise pointille´e: Av. E.). D repre´sente, pour chaque bassin, la variation 87Sr/86Sr de la moyenne e´diacarienne (Av. E.). Voir la partie me´thode. Remarquez la croissance ge´ne´rale des valeurs du 87Sr/86Sr a` travers la pe´riode e´diacarienne.

record is available and limited to the Late Ediacaran and Cambrian period (Table S1, Supplementary data; Krol C to Tal Formation (Tewari and Sial, 2007)). The Krol Formation also contains multiple sequence boundaries potentially biasing the chemostratigraphic record (Jiang et al., 2003b; Jiang et al., 2002).

4.4. Siberia Siberian sections present a rather matching isotopic pattern with Oman’s sections in terms of amplitude and stratigraphic thickness of the negative d13C anomaly and also a large 87Sr/86Sr dataset (Table S1, Supplementary

E. Le Guerroue´ / C. R. Geoscience 342 (2010) 204–214

data). The d13C excursion is reproduced in different places in the basin and does not present significant unconformities (Fig. 1D (Pokrovskii et al., 2006; Vinogradov et al., 2006a)). The succession is unfortunately not robustly time constrained apart from the presence of a possible Marinoan-aged glacial unit and Cambrian-aged fossils towards the top of the sections (Pokrovskii et al., 2006). Further isotope data is available for the Cambrian and matches worldwide correlations (Vinogradov et al., 2006b; Vinogradov et al., 2006a). 4.5. Australia The d13C pattern of the Wonoka Formation from the Adelaide Rift Complex of southern Australia matches that of the Shuram Formation of Oman. It is reproduced in different places, spanning a long stratigraphic record (Fig. 1E (Calver, 2000; Calver and Lindsay, 1998; Foden et al., 2001)) with several major stratigraphic unconformities (the Wonoka canyons (Christie-Blick et al., 1990)) that constrain the most negative d13C values (Calver, 2000; Le Guerroue´ and Kennedy, 2007). 87Sr/86Sr values from the Julie and Karlaya formations of the Amadeus and officer basins respectively are also included in this data set (Table S1, Supplementary data (Calver and Lindsay, 1998)). Regional studies suggest that the Julie and Karlaya formations correlate to the base of the Wonoka (Calver and Lindsay, 1998). The Australian Ediacaran succession that represents the GSSP is unfortunately not firmly time constrained with the exception of the presence of Ediacaran and Cambrian aged fossils towards the top of the sections. 4.6. Canada The Windermere Group of western Canada presents a thick Ediacaran succession with very limited d13C measurements available. The strontium isotopes record is restricted to the base of the succession (Table S1, Supplementary data (James et al., 2001; Narbonne et al., 1994)). Stratigraphically, the succession does not appear to contain significant unconformities and strongly resembles the one recorded in Oman (the two ‘‘grand cycles’’ (Allen and Leather, 2006; Le Guerroue´ et al., 2006c)). If stratigraphic correlations are correct then the negative d13C excursion is not time equivalent to the Shuram anomaly but to the Precambrian/Cambrian shift (Amthor et al., 2003; Corsetti and Hagadorn, 2000). Ultimately, given the paucity of available data, the Shuram excursion could be not yet be documented in western Canada. 4.7. Namibia The stratigraphic record of Namibia contains a major sedimentary break covering most of the Ediacaran period (Halverson et al., 2005). The lower part of the exposed stratigraphy belongs to the post-Marinoan aged glacials deposits of the Ghaub Formation (Hoffman et al., 1998; Hoffmann et al., 2004) while the upper part belongs to the very end of the Ediacaran period (Fig. 2 (Saylor et al., 1998)). Isotopically (Table S1, Supplementary data (Kauf-

209

man et al., 1993; Kennedy et al., 1998)), Namibia is probably missing the Shuram anomaly within the unconformity (Halverson et al., 2005). 4.8. Mongolia The Tsagaan Oloom Formation records, on top of glacial deposits, sediments up to the Cambrian (Brasier et al., 1996b; Shields et al., 1997; Shields et al., 2002). Glacial strata are capped by carbonates presenting a d13C signature typical of ‘‘cap carbonate’’ although the carbonate facies is unusual (Table S1, Supplementary data (Shields et al., 2002)). The succession is not constrained in age and an assignment of the upper Tsagaan glacial diamictite to the Marinoan (c. 635 Ma) could be proposed. This would imply a deposition of the overlying succession within the Ediacaran period. However no Shuram equivalent isotope anomaly is found in Mongolia, instead the d13C record shows highly positive values attaining +10% in sequence 3 and 4 (Table S1, Supplementary data). These high values are generally encountered in-between both glacial events (labelled Sturtian-Marinoan (Halverson et al., 2005)) implying than the glacials could be older than 635 Ma. If this hypothesis is correct, a very significant stratigraphic record (the Marinoan glacials and the entire Shuram anomaly) would be missing at top sequence 4 and or 5. Very low strontium isotope ratio supports the assignment of the sequence 3 and 4 to the SturtianMarinoan interval (that is generally low (Halverson et al., 2007; Melezhik et al., 2001)). Ediacaran like values are encountered in sequence 5 and 6 with values in unit 5 being more of Lower Ediacaran affinity whereas those one in unit 6 could be of Upper Ediacaran (Table S1, Supplementary data). The end of the section presents a d13C negative excursion inferred to represent the Precambrian/Cambrian boundary (Amthor et al., 2003; Brasier et al., 1996a). We favour the hypothesis that sequence 3 and 4 are pre-Marinoan in age (based on the d13C record). Unit 5 would then represent the base of the Ediacaran period whereas unit 6 would be of Upper Ediacaran age, leading to the Precambrian/Cambrian boundary (Brasier et al., 1996a). This hypothesis is supported by absolute values of the d13C and 87Sr/86Sr record that also shows significant jump at the sequence boundaries (Fig. 2). 4.9. Scandinavia The North Central Scandinavian Caledonides presents in its early chemostratigraphic record a negative d13C anomaly (the so-called Leivset marble presenting 8% d13C values; Table S1, Supplementary data) on top of a sharp tectonic contact bringing the stratigraphy on top of Silurian aged dark grey marble (Melezhik et al., 2008). If the upper succession is not firmly constrained in time, an Ediacaran age is proposed and largely supported by the 87 Sr/86Sr record (Table S1, Supplementary data; that shows a sharp jump with the underlying Silurian unit (Melezhik et al., 2008)). The anomaly is well reproduced within different sections although it appears incomplete (limited outcrops and fault contact) in regards to the Shuram anomaly (Melezhik et al., 2008).

210

E. Le Guerroue´ / C. R. Geoscience 342 (2010) 204–214

4.10. Brazil The succession in Brazil is comprised in the Araras and Alto Paraguai groups (De Alvarenga et al., 2008; De Alvarenga et al., 2004; Nogueira et al., 2007) and is dissected in four different sequences separated by potentially significant time breaks. Brazil’s sections present negative d13C values around 2 to 3% all the way up to the Cambrian, contrasting sharply with the pattern observed in Oman or elsewhere (Table S1, Supplementary data). 87Sr/86Sr ratios support however an Ediacaran age assignment (Table S1, Supplementary data). Yet considering the stratigraphic complexities and possible time missing in the stratigraphic breaks, it is difficult to reconcile a Shuram type anomaly in Brazil. 5. Methods Available 87Sr/86Sr values from the literature are used to time calibrate unconstrained pieces of stratigraphy and eventually use the reconstructed time frames to independently test the d13C record. The methodology developed here comprises four steps:  The Marinoan cap carbonate (ca. 635 Ma (Bowring et al., 2007; Condon et al., 2005; Hoffmann et al., 2004)) and the Precambrian/Cambrian boundary (ca. 542 Ma (Amthor et al., 2003; Knoll et al., 2004)) are defined as two tie points that associated to a 87Sr/86Sr ratio calculated from averaging minimum values present in all sections (Table 1). These tie points (635 Ma; 0.70758) and (542 Ma; 0.70891) are chosen as they are time equivalent and easily recognizable in all sections. Our values are in a close range to Halverson et al. (Halverson et al., 2007). The slight difference being non relevant here as these tie points are used for comparison among

datasets used here. Theoretical 87Sr/86Sr variation between the two tie points is around 0.00121 (Table 1) and is assumed constant through time. This assumption is largely supported by individual dataset that presents a rather linear variation and previous comprehensive studies that fail to identify first order knee points in the Ediacaran period (Table S1, Supplementary data (Halverson et al., 2007; Prokoph et al., 2008) and references therein);  The steady variation between the two tie points represents the theoretical global ocean variation throughout the Ediacaran and serves as a template to compare and calibrate individual datasets. Variation in 87 Sr/86Sr among individual datasets exists and reflects basinal individual specificities related to diagenetic alteration. Individual datasets are therefore corrected for variation from the average global Ediacaran trend by shifting their entire dataset to lower or higher 87Sr/86Sr values. This is D on Fig. 2. This correction is applied here in order to allow datasets comparison, it is not assumed to represent specific geological phenomenon;  Fig. 2 is constructed using chemostratigraphic data from the literature (Table S1, Supplementary data) given available biostratigraphic record, recognized sedimentary hiatuses and absolute radiometric constraints. Stratigraphic pieces belonging to the cap carbonate sequence are bounded to the 635 Ma lower limits and strata containing the Precambrian/Cambrian boundary sequence are bounded to the 542 Ma upper limits. Time unconstrained pieces of stratigraphy, such as strata bounded by major regional unconformities are time calibrated (moved along the time axis) by nearest match of their 87Sr/86Sr values (corrected for local basin setting (D)) with the average Ediacaran trend. Since diagenesis increases 87Sr/86Sr ratio, data points are not individually time adjusted. Minimum 87Sr/86Sr values of stratigraphic

Fig. 3. Ediacaran 87Sr/86Sr (A) and d13C (B) composite constructed using time frame defined in Fig. 2. Note the 3 distinctive negative d13C packages corresponding to the Marinoan cap carbonates, the Precambrian/Cambrian boundary (P - ) and the Shuram anomaly (yellow areas). 87Sr/86Sr tie points (red point) defined in Table 1 are represented as well as the average Ediacaran trend (dashed grey line). Note that the bulk of negative d13C values associated with the Shuram anomaly start around 600 Ma and end around 550 Ma. See discussion in text. Fig. 3. Composites 87Sr/86Sr (A) et d13C (B) e´diacariens, construits en utilisant l’e´chelle de temps de´finie en Fig. 2. Les 3 paquets d13C ne´gatifs tre`s distincts correspondent a` la cap carbonate marinoenne, a` la limite Pre´cambrien/Cambrien (P - ) et a` l’anomalie de Shuram (zone jaune). Les points d’ancrage 87 Sr/86Sr (points rouges) de´finis dans le Tableau 1 sont aussi repre´sente´s, ainsi que la moyenne e´diacarienne (ligne grise pointille´e). L’essentiel des valeurs d13C ne´gatives sont associe´es a` l’anomalie de Shuram commenc¸ant autour de 600 Ma et finissant vers 550 Ma. Voir discussion dans le texte.

E. Le Guerroue´ / C. R. Geoscience 342 (2010) 204–214

fragments are calibrated as coherent block. This procedure is supported by the large residence time of Sr in the ocean (3–5 Ma);  Finally the d13C vales are stacked (Fig. 3B) using the time calibration reconstructed from 87Sr/86Sr values in Fig. 2. It is important to note that the time calibration is constructed entirely without reference to d13C curve. Only samples with both 87Sr/86Sr and d13C measurements at a strictly similar stratigraphic interval are used (Fig. 2). 6. Results With current published isotope data, absolute age constraints, acceptance of minimum diagenetic modification to values, and the use of the 87Sr/86Sr steady rising trend to independently calibrate poorly time constrained fragments, the Ediacaran period provides a compelling example of stratigraphic consistency of carbon isotope values between sections. In the light of this approach, the reconstruction shows that 3 individual negative d13C packages appear in the Ediacaran composite record (Fig. 3). These negative d13C anomalies are well reproduced and have duration and amplitude specificities. They correspond to: (1) the well established Marinoan cap carbonate anomaly immediately preceding the glacial deposits (Halverson et al., 2005; Hoffman et al., 1998; Shields, 2005); (2) a long lived and profound Shuram/Wonoka excursion (Condon et al., 2005; Halverson et al., 2005; Le Guerroue´ et al., 2006c; Melezhik et al., 2008); (3) the Precambrian/Cambrian boundary shift (Amthor et al., 2003; Corsetti and Hagadorn, 2000; Saylor et al., 1998). This composite record fails to recognize, at the global scale, other potential negative d13C excursions such as the one present in the lower stratigraphy of the Krol Formation of India. Such excursions are therefore interpreted as nonsynchronous and are probably related to diagenetic issues or basinal disconnection from the global ocean. The bulk of the negative values associated with the Shuram/Wonoka excursion start around 600 Ma and end somewhere around 550 Ma (Fig. 3). These brackets are supported by published ages constraining the nadir of the excursion in Oman and China (Barfod et al., 2002; Le Guerroue´ et al., 2006c) as well as a cq. 551 Ma constraining the end of the anomaly in China (Condon et al., 2005). Other authors (Bowring et al., 2007; Condon et al., 2005; Fike et al., 2006; Halverson et al., 2007) favour a much younger age for the nadir of the Shuram excursion although no direct radiometric age supports these assignments. The anomaly appears to last 40–50 Ma; this very long duration is well supported by sections like those in Oman and Siberia, whereas sections like those of Australia and China suggest a shorter duration around 20–30 Ma (Fig. 3). It is also to note the partial time overlap of positive or weakly negative d13C values during the Shuram anomaly probably due to inherent flaws in the time reconstruction and the lack of data point in some of the

211

datasets. This is particularly the case in the Brazilian and Canadian sections. However Canada seriously lack data in this very specific interval and the nearly continuous d13C record in Brazil with values around 0% not easily reconcilable with the general trend. 7. Discussion It is important to realize that there is no common mechanism driving the 87Sr/86Sr and d13C record and that standard screenings failed to identify major diagenetic overprinting. Diagenesis generally raises Mn contents and 87 Sr/86Sr ratios and lowers Sr contents and d13C as well as 18 d O values of carbonate (Brand and Veizer, 1980; Veizer, 1983), also carbonates with Mn/Sr < 10 more often retain primary carbon isotope compositions (Derry et al., 1992; Kaufman et al., 1993; Kaufman and Knoll, 1995), while carbonate with Mn/Sr > 10 and d18O > 10% may exhibit altered C-isotope compositions. Isotopic data used here were screened in original publication and the reader is referred to originally published material for further discussion on diagenetic screening of individual data sets that all pass these standard assessments. Given the large (3–5 Ma) residence time of Sr in the ocean this study focuses on minimum 87Sr/86Sr values (closest to past coeval oceanic composition) of coherent stratigraphic fragments allowing to overcome diagenetic overprint of specific horizons. The basinal correction (D on Fig. 2; see method section) from the averaged Ediacaran trend (Table 1) allows compensating for variation in datasets and best time calibrate all sections. These variations are likely to represent after deposition diagenesis, shifting values throughout individual basin. Another hypothesis would be a diachronic nature of the cap carbonate tie point. This appears less likely as the cap carbonate is synchronous on two continental fragments (Condon et al., 2005; Hoffmann et al., 2004) and probably a third (Bowring et al., 2007). The Ediacaran 87Sr/86Sr composite record obtained is in good agreement with past studies (Halverson et al., 2007; Jacobsen and Kaufman, 1999; Thomas et al., 2004; Walter et al., 2000) although datasets from individual basin show some variation (Fig. 3A). The composite section on Fig. 3B shows a rise from about 0.707 to 0.7085 throughout the Ediacaran period without individual basinal correction (D on Fig. 2). Ediacaran average variation is in the order of 0.00121 from the cap carbonate to the Precambrian/ Cambrian boundary tie points (Table 1) with a rise of about 1.30  10 05/Ma that is comparable to the 87Sr/86Sr variation throughout the Cretaceous period based on Prokoph et al., 2008 compilation (their Fig. 4, shows a variation in the order of 1.0  10 05/Ma in the Cretaceous). Classically the Ediacaran large-scale steady variation is interpreted to be the record of the final stage of the Rodinia breakup and the early amalgamation of Gondwana during the Ediacaran (Halverson et al., 2007). The slow variation in the Ediacaran 87Sr/86Sr record could be the witness of this tectonically (erosion rate related) more quiescent period. It should be noted from Fig. 3B, that the absence of such a distinctive d13C long-lived feature in Canada (all positive values (Narbonne et al., 1994)) and Brazil (all negative

212

E. Le Guerroue´ / C. R. Geoscience 342 (2010) 204–214

values (De Alvarenga et al., 2008; De Alvarenga et al., 2004; Nogueira et al., 2007)), and the partial time overlap of positive values in South China (Condon et al., 2005), but see Zhu et al., 2007 and India (that is extremely variable (Kaufman et al., 2006)), argues against a global feature. Studying these basins in greater detail and chemostratigraphic resolution will help clarify inconsistencies. For example, the Johnny Formation of Death Valley (Corsetti and Kaufman, 2003) and Windermere Group of Canada (Narbonne et al., 1994) excursions are based on < 30 values from up to 2000 m of section. Identification of possible significant time break biasing the chemostratigraphic record as well as potential basin restriction from the global ocean needs to be clarified in all successions. For example the Doushantuo Formation has recently been interpreted to be locally deposited in an alkaline lake (Bristow et al., 2009) and probably stratified water column (Ader et al., 2009. Recent improvement in the Ediacaran biostratigraphy (Grey and Calver, 2007; Shen et al., 2008; Willman and Moczydlowska, 2008) and paleogeography (Li et al., 2008; Pisarevsky et al., 2008) will help resolving uncertainties and refine the chronostratigraphic record. Ultimately, a demonstrated synchroneity of the Shuram anomaly equivalent excursions on all continental fragments is a fundamental step towards understanding its origin as a primary oceanographic phenomenon. A noncoeval interpretation will clearly point out to diagenetic alteration of the carbonate material and furthermore questions Neoproterozoic global correlation mainly reconstructed from the d13C record (Halverson et al., 2005; Knoll et al., 2004). 8. Conclusions 87

86

The study of different Ediacaran aged Sr/ Sr record of several continental masses leads to the following conclusions:  A d13C excursion of the magnitude and duration of the Shuram/Wonoka anomaly, if representative of a primary oceanographic signal, should be coeval in different sections on different continental margins. Indeed it has to be repeated everywhere connected to the global ocean to rule out diachronous diagenetic imprints. Correlations solely based on the sparse available radiometric ages are currently not able to address robustly the synchroneity issue.  This study proposes a critical test of this hypothesis by using strontium isotopes as an independent chronometer to better time constrain individual pieces of Ediacaran stratigraphy that otherwise only relies on a few, often weak, radiometric age constraints. This new composite section validates the Shuram/Wonoka excursion reproducibility and synchroneity at the global scale and proposes a negative d13C shift reaching a nadir > 10% around 600 Ma and followed by a steady recovery towards positive values ending around 550 Ma. This negative excursion is recorded in many different basins on several continental fragments (Oman, Australia, Siberia, China, Scandinavia) supporting its origin as a primary oceanographic signal.

 The Shuram/Wonoka excursion is a secular phenomenon spanning a few tens of millions of years and is therefore representative of the changing global ocean value in steady state condition. The exogenic cycle must have functioned with very different, and currently unrecognized, controls than during the Phanerozoic (Bartley and Kah, 2004) probably involving a large carbon reservoir with much longer residence time (Rothman et al., 2003) or a protracted release of significant light carbon. The strongly negative d13C excursions (Fig. 1) could imply oxidation of such a large reservoir of organic carbon (Fike et al., 2006; Peltier et al., 2007; Rothman et al., 2003). A primary marine interpretation for this data has significant implications for the interrelationship of evolutionary events and the carbon cycle that has not been fully explored (Peltier et al., 2007) and could record oxidation of this organic carbon reservoir with draw down of atmospheric oxygen. The end of the oxidation event around 550 Ma would allow p02 to build up sufficiently to impact metazoan evolution.

Acknowledgements Swiss national research project (Number: PBEZ2115170) is thanked for financial support. Petroleum Development Oman and especially Jan Schreurs are thanked for long time support. This is a contribution to the IGCP-512 project. Anonymous reviewers helped to improve the manuscript. Appendix A. Supplementary data Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.crte.2009.12.008. References Ader, M., M. Macouin, R.I.F. Trindade, M-H. Hadrien, Z. Yang, Z. Sun, and J. Besse. 2009. A multilayered water column in the Ediacaran Yangtze platform? Insights from carbonate and organic matter paired [delta]13C. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 288, no. 1-2 (October 30): 213-227. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2009.09.024. http://www.sciencedirect.com.biblioplanets.gate.inist.fr/science/article/B6V61-4XFF2S3-3/2/ 77567be090b7a993ee1a6bf55dae9149.. Allen, P.A., 2007. The Huqf Supergroup of Oman: Basin development and context for Neoproterozoic glaciation. Earth-Science Reviews 84, 139–185. Allen, P.A., Leather, J., 2006. Post-Marinoan marine siliciclastic sedimentation: The Masirah Bay Formation, Neoproterozoic Huqf Supergroup of Oman. Precamb. Res. 144, 167–198. Amthor, J.E., Grotzinger, S., Schro¨der, S.A., Bowring, J., Ramezani, M., Martin, M., Matter, A., 2003. Extinction of Cloudina and Namacalathus at the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary in Oman. Geology 31, 431– 434. Anbar, A.D., Knoll, A.H., 2002. Proterozoic ocean chemistry and evolution: A bioinorganic bridge? Science 297, 1137–1142. Barfod, H.G., Albare`de, F., Knoll, A.H., Xiao, S., Te´louk, P., Frei, R., Baker, J., 2002. New Lu-Hf and Pb-Pb age constraints on the earliest animal fossils. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 201, 203–212. Bartley, J.K., Kah, L.C., 2004. Marine carbon reservoir, Corg-Ccarb coupling, and the evolution of the Proterozoic carbon cycle. Geology 32, 129– 132. Bowring, S.A., Grotzinger, J.P., Condon, D.J., Ramezani, J., Newall, M.J., Allen, P.A., 2007. Geochronologic constraints on the chronostratigraphic framework of the Neoproterozoic Huqf Supergroup, Sultanate of Oman. Am. J. Sci. 307, 1097–1145. Brand, U., Veizer, J., 1980. Chemical diagenesis of a multicomponent carbonate system; 1, Trace elements. J. Sedim. Res. 50, 1219–1236.

E. Le Guerroue´ / C. R. Geoscience 342 (2010) 204–214 Brasier, M.D., Dorjnamjaa, D., Lindsay, J.F., 1996a. The Neoproterozoic to Early Cambrian in Southwest Mongolia; an introduction. Geol. Mag. 133, 365–369. Brasier, M.D., Shields, G., Kuleshov, V.N., Zhegallo, E.A., 1996b. Integrated chemo- and biostratigraphic calibration of early animal evolution; Neoproterozoic-Early Cambrian of Southwest Mongolia. Geol. Mag. 133, 445–485. Bristow, T.F., Kennedy, M.J., Derkowski, A., Droser, M.L., Jiang, G., Creaser, R.A., 2009. Mineralogical constraints on the paleoenvironments of the Ediacaran Doushantuo Formation. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106. pp. 13190–13195. Broecker, W.S., Peng, T.H., 1982. Tracers in the Sea. Eldigio Press, Palisades, New York, 690 p. Burns, S.J., Matter, A., 1993. Carbon isotopic record of the Latest Proterozoic from Oman. Eclogae Geol. Helv. 86, 595–607. Burns, S.J., Haudenschild, U., Matter, A., 1994. The strontium isotopic composition of carbonates from the Late Precambrian ( 560540 Ma) Huqf Group of Oman. Chem. Geol. 111, 269–282. Calver, C.R., 2000. Isotope stratigraphy of the Ediacaran (Neoproterozoic III) of the Adelaide Rift Complex, Australia, and the overprint of water column stratification. Precamb. Res. 100, 121–150. Calver, C.R., Lindsay, J.F., 1998. Ediacarian sequence and isotope stratigraphy of the Officer Basin, South Australia. Austr. J. Earth Sci. 45, 513– 532. Canfield, D.E., Teske, A., 1996. Late Proterozoic rise in atmospheric oxygen concentration inferred from phylogenetic and sulphur-isotope studies. Nature 382, 127–132. Chen, D.F., Dong, W.Q., Zhu, B.Q., Chen, X.P., 2004. Pb-Pb ages of Neoproterozoic Doushantuo phosphorites in South China: Constraints on early metazoan evolution and glaciation events. Precamb. Res. 132, 123–132. Christie-Blick, N., von der Borch, C.C., DiBona, P.A., 1990. Working hypotheses for the origin of the Wonoka Canyons (Neoproterozoic), South Australia. Am. J. Sci. 290, 295–332. Condon, D., Zhu, M., Bowring, S., Wang, W., Yang, A., Jin, Y., 2005. U-Pb Ages from the Neoproterozoic Doushantuo Formation, China. Science 308, 95–98. Corsetti, F.A., Hagadorn, J.W., 2000. Precambrian-Cambrian transition: Death Valley, United States. Geology 28, 299–302. Corsetti, F.A., Kaufman, A.J., 2003. Stratigraphic investigations of carbon isotope anomalies and Neoproterozoic ice ages in Death Valley, California. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 115, 916–932. Cozzi, A., Grotzinger, J.P., Allen, P.A., 2004a. Evolution of a terminal Neoproterozoic carbonate ramp system (Buah Formation, Sultanate of Oman): Effects of basement paleotopography. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 116, 1121–1131. Cozzi, A., Allen, P.A., Grotzinger, J.P., 2004b. Understanding carbonate ramp dynamics using d13C profiles: Examples from the Neoproterozoic Buah Formation of Oman. Terra Nova 16, 62–67. De Alvarenga, C.J.S., Santos, R.V., Dantas, E.L., 2004. C-O-Sr isotopic stratigraphy of cap carbonates overlying Marinoan-age glacial diamictites in the Paraguay Belt, Brazil. Precamb. Res. 131, 1–21. De Alvarenga, C.J.S., Dardenne, M.A., Santos, R.V., Brod, E.R., Gioia, S.M.C.L., Sial, A.N., Dantas, E.L., Ferreira, V.P., 2008. Isotope stratigraphy of Neoproterozoic cap carbonates in the Araras Group, Brazil. Gondwana Research 13, 469–479. Derry, L.A., Kaufman, A.J., Jacobsen, S.B., 1992. Sedimentary cycling and environmental change in the Late Proterozic: Evidence from stable and radiogenic isotopes. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 56, 1317–1329. Fike, D.A., Grotzinger, J.P., Pratt, L.M., Summons, R.E., 2006. Oxidation of the Ediacaran Ocean. Nature 444, 744–747. Foden, J., Barovich, K., Jane, M., O’Halloran, G., 2001. Sr-isotopic evidence for Late Neoproterozoic rifting in the Adelaide Geosyncline at 586 Ma: Implications for a Cu ore forming fluid flux. Precamb. Res. 106, 291– 308. Frauenstein,F., Veizer, J., Beukes, N., Van Niekerk, H.S., Coetzee, L.L., Transvaal Supergroup carbonates: Implications for Paleoproterozoic d18O and d13C records, Precamb. Res. In press. Grey, K., Calver, C.R., 2007. Ediacaran oxidation and biotic evolution. Nature 450, E17–E117. Halverson, G.P., Dudas, F.O., Maloof, A.C., Bowring, S.A., 2007. Evolution of the 87Sr/86Sr composition of Neoproterozoic seawater. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 256, 103–129. Halverson, G.P., Hoffman, P.F., Schrag, D.P., Maloof, A.C., Rice, A.H.N., 2005. Towards a Neoproterozoic composite carbon isotope record. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 117, 1181–1207. Hayes, J.M., Strauss, H., Kaufman, A.J., 1999. The abundance of 13C in marine organic matter and isotopic fractionation in the global biogeochemical cycle of carbon during the past 800 Ma. Chem. Geol. 161, 103–125.

213

Hoffman, P.F., Kaufman, A.J., Halverson, G.P., Schrag, D.P., 1998. A Neoproterozoic snowball Earth. Science 281, 1342–1346. Hoffmann, K.H., Condon, D.J., Bowring, S.A., Crowley, J.L., 2004. U-Pb zircon date from the Neoproterozoic Ghaub Formation, Namibia: Constraints on Marinoan glaciation. Geology 32, 817–820. Jacobsen, S.B., Kaufman, A.J., 1999. The Sr, C and O isotopic evolution of Neoproterozoic seawater. Chem. Geol. 161, 37–57. James, N.P., Narbonne, G.M., Kyser, T.K., 2001. Late Neoproterozoic cap carbonates: Mackenzie Mountains, northwestern Canada: Precipitation and global glacial meltdown. Canad. J. Earth Sci. 38, 1229–1262. Jiang, G., Kennedy, M.J., Christie-Blick, N., 2003a. Stable isotopic evidence for methane seeps in Neoproterozoic postglacial cap carbonates. Nature 426, 822–826. Jiang, G., Christie-Blick, N., Kaufman, A.J., Banerjee, D.M., Rai, V., 2003b. Carbonate platform growth and cyclicity at a terminal Proterozoic passive margin, Infra Krol Formation and Krol Group, Lesser Himalaya, India. Sedimentology 50, 921–952. Jiang, G.Q., Christie-Blick, N., Kaufman, A.J., Banerjee, D.M., Rai, V., 2002. Sequence stratigraphy of the Neoproterozoic Infra Krol Formation and Krol Group, Lesser Himalaya, India. J. Sedim. Res. 72, 524–542. Kah, L.C., Lyons, T.W., Frank, T.D., 2004. Low marine sulphate and protracted oxygenation of the Proterozoic biosphere. Nature 431, 834– 838. Kaufman, A.J., Knoll, A.H., 1995. Neoproterozoic variations in the Cisotopic composition of seawater: Stratigraphic and biogeochemical implications. Precamb. Res. 73, 27–49. Kaufman, A.J., Jacobsen, S.B., Knoll, A.H., 1993. The Vendian record of Sr and C isotopic variations in seawater: Implications for tectonics and palaeoclimate. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 120, 409–430. Kaufman, A.J., Jiang, G., Christie-Blick, N., Banerjee, D.M., Rai, V., 2006. Stable isotope record of the terminal Neoproterozoic Krol platform in the Lesser Himalayas of northern India. Precamb. Res. 147, 156–185. Kennedy, M., Droser, M., Mayer, L.M., Pevear, D., Mrofka, D., 2006. Late Precambrian Oxygenation; Inception of the Clay Mineral Factory. Science 311, 1446–1449. Kennedy, M.J., Runnegar, B., Prave, A.R., Hoffmann, K.H., Arthur, M.A., 1998. Two or four Neoproterozoic glaciations? Geology 26, 1059– 1063. Knoll, A.H., 2000. Learning to tell Neoproterozoic time. Precamb. Res. 100, 3–20. Knoll, A.H., Walter, M.R., 1992. Latest Proterozoic stratigraphy and Earth history. Nature 356, 673–677. Knoll, A.H., Caroll, S.B., 1999. Early Animal Evolution: Emerging Views from Comparative Biology and Geology. Science 284 . Knoll, A.H., Walter, M.R., Narbonne, G.M., Christie-Blick, N., 2004. A New Period for the Geologic Time Scale. Science 305, 621–622. Knoll, A.H., Hayes, J.M., Kaufman, A.J., Swett, K., Lambert, I.B., 1986. Secular variation in carbon isotope ratios from Upper Proterozoic successions of Svalbard and East Greenland. Nature 321, 832– 838. Le Guerroue´, E., Kennedy, M., 2007. Neoproterozoic Carbon Isotopes of the Neoproterozoic Shuram and Wonoka Formations., AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition. Long Beach, California. (April 1-4 2007). Technical Program.. Le Guerroue´, E., Cozzi, A., Veracity of Neoproterozoic negative C isotope values: The termination of the Shuram negative excursion, Gondwana Research. In press. Le Guerroue´, E., Allen, P.A., Cozzi, A., 2005. Two distinct glacial successions in the Neoproterozoic of Oman. GeoArabia 10, 17–34. Le Guerroue´, E., Allen, P.A., Cozzi, A., 2006a. Chemostratigraphic and sedimentological framework of the largest negative carbon isotopic excursion in Earth history: The Neoproterozoic Shuram Formation (Nafun Group, Oman). Precamb. Res. 146, 68–92. Le Guerroue´, E., Allen, P.A., Cozzi, A., 2006b. Parasequence development in the Ediacaran Shuram Formation (Nafun Group, Oman): High resolution stratigraphic test for primary origin of negative carbon isotopic ratios. Basin Res. 18, 205–220. Le Guerroue´, E., Allen, P.A., Cozzi, A., Etienne, J.L., Fanning, C.M., 2006c. 50 Myr recovery from the largest negative d13C excursion in the Ediacaran ocean. Terra Nova 18, 147–153. Li, Z.X., Bogdanova, S.V., Collins, A.S., Davidson, A., De Waele, B., Ernst, R.E., Fitzsimons, I.C.W., Fuck, R.A., Gladkochub, D.P., Jacobs, J., Karlstrom, K.E., Lu, S., Natapov, L.M., Pease, V., Pisarevsky, S.A., Thrane, K., Vernikovsky, V., 2008. Assembly, configuration, and break-up history of Rodinia: A synthesis. Precamb. Res. 160, 179–210. Ling, H.-F., Feng, H.-Z., Pan, J.-Y., Jiang, S.-Y., Chen, Y.-Q., Chen, X., 2007. Carbon isotope variation through the Neoproterozoic Doushantuo and Dengying Formations, South China: Implications for chemostratigraphy and paleoenvironmental change. Palaeogeog. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 254, 158–174.

214

E. Le Guerroue´ / C. R. Geoscience 342 (2010) 204–214

Magaritz, M., 1991. Carbon isotopes, time boundaries and evolution. Terra Nova 3, 251–256. Melezhik, V.A., Gorokhov, I.M., Kuznetsov, A.B., Fallick, A.E., 2001. Chemostratigraphy of Neoproterozoic carbonates: Implications for ‘blind’ dating. Terra Nova 13, 1–11. Melezhik, V.A., Roberts, D., Fallick, A.E., Gorokhov, I.M., 2008. The ShuramWonoka event recorded in a high-grade metamorphic terrane: Insight from the Scandinavian Caledonides. Geol. Mag. 145, 161–172. Narbonne, G.M., 1994. New Ediacaran Fossils from the Mackenzie Mountains, Northwestern Canada. J. Paleontology 68, 411–416. Narbonne, G.M., Kaufman, A.J., Knoll, A.H., 1994. Integrated chemostratigraphy and biostratigraphy of the Windermere Supergroup, northwestern Canada; implications for Neoproterozoic correlations and the early evolution of animals; with Suppl. Data 9434. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 106, 1281–1292. Nogueira, A.C.R., Riccomini, C., Sial, A.N., Moura, C.A.V., Trindade, R.I.F., Fairchild, T.R., 2007. Carbon and strontium isotope fluctuations and paleoceanographic changes in the Late Neoproterozoic Araras carbonate platform, southern Amazon craton. Brazil Chem. Geol. 237, 168–190. Ohno, T., Komiya, T., Ueno, T.H.Y., Maruyama, S., 2008. Determination of 88 Sr/86Sr mass-dependent isotopic fractionation and radiogenic isotope variation of 87Sr/86Sr in the Neoproterozoic Doushantuo Formation. Gondwana Res. 14, 126–133. Peltier, W.R., Liu, Y., Crowley, J.W., 2007. Snowball Earth prevention by dissolved organic carbon remineralization. Nature 450, 813–818. Peterman, Z.E., Hedge, C.E., Tourtelot, H.A., 1970. Isotopic composition of strontium in sea water throughout Phanerozoic time. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 34, 105–120. Pisarevsky, S.A., Murphy, J.B., Cawood, P.A., Collins, A.S., 2008. Late Neoproterozoic and Early Cambrian palaeogeography: Models and problems, Geological Society, London. Special Publications 294, 9–31. Pokrovskii, B.G., Melezhik, V.A., Bujakaite, M.I., 2006. Carbon, Oxygen, Strontium, and Sulfur isotopic compositions in Late Precambrian rocks of the Patom Complex, central Siberia: Communication 1. results, isotope stratigraphy, and dating problems. Lithology Mineral Resources 41, 450–474. Prokoph, A., Shields, G.A., Veizer, J., 2008. Compilation and time-series analysis of a marine carbonate d18O, d13C, 87Sr/86Sr and d34S database through Earth history. Earth-Sci. Rev. 87, 113–133. Rothman, D.H., Hayes, J.M., Summons, R.E., 2003. Dynamics of the Neoproterozoic carbon cycle. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 10. pp. 8124–8129. Saylor, B.Z., Kaufman, A.J., Grotzinger, J.P., Urban, F., 1998. A composite reference section for terminal Proterozoic strata of southern Namibia. J. Sedim. Res. 68, 1223–1235. Schidlowski, M., Aharon, P., 1992. Carbon cycle and carbon isotope record: Geochemical impact of life over 3. 8 Ga of Earth history. In: Schidlowski, M. (Ed.), Early Organic Evolution: Implications of Mineral and Energy Resources. Springer, Berlin, pp. 147–175. Shen, Y., Zhang, T., Hoffman, P.F., 2008. On the coevolution of Ediacaran oceans and animals. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105. pp. 7376–7381. Shields, G.A., 2005. Neoproterozoic cap carbonates: A critical appraisal of existing models and the plumeworld hypothesis. Terra Nova 17, 299– 310.

Shields, G., Veizer, J., 2002. Precambrian marine carbonate isotope database: Version 1.1. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems 3, 1031. Shields, G., Stille, P., Brasier, M.D., Atudorei, N.-V., 1997. Stratified oceans and oxygenation of the late Precambrian environment: A post glacial geochemical record from the Neoproterozoic of W. Mongolia. Terra Nova 9, 218–222. Shields, G.A., Brasier, M.D., Stille, P., Dorjnamjaa, D.-i., 2002. Factors contributing to high 13C values in Cryogenian limestones of western Mongolia. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 196, 99–111. Swart, P.K., Eberli, G., 2005. The nature of the d13C of periplatform sediments: Implications for stratigraphy and the global carbon cycle. Sedim. Geol. 175, 115–129. Tewari, V.C., Sial, A.N., 2007. Neoproterozoic-Early Cambrian isotopic variation and chemostratigraphy of the Lesser Himalaya, India, Eastern Gondwana. Chem. Geol. 237, 64–88. Thomas, C., Graham, C., Ellam, R., Fallick, A., 2004. 87Sr/86Sr chemostratigraphy of Neoproterozoic Dalradian limestones of Scotland and Ireland: Constraints on depositional ages and time scales. J. Geol. Soc. 161, 229–242. Veizer, J., 1983. Chemical diagenesis of carbonates; theory and application of trace element technique. In: Arthur, M.A., Anderson, T.F., Kaplan, I.R., Veizer, J., Land, L.S. (Eds.), Stable isotopes in sedimentary geology, 10. Society for Sedimentary Geology Short Course, pp. 1–100. Veizer, J., 1989. Strontium Isotopes in Seawater through Time. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 17, 141–167. Veizer, J., Compston, W., 1974. 87Sr/86Sr composition of seawater during the Phanerozoic. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 56, 431–443. Veizer, J., Ala, D., Azmy, K., Bruckschen, P., Buhl, D., Bruhn, F., Carden, G.A.F., Diener, A., Ebneth, S., Godderis, Y., 1999. 87Sr/86Sr, d13C and d18O evolution of Phanerozoic seawater. Chem. Geol. 161, 59–88. Vinogradov, V., Belenitskaya, G., Bujakaite, M., Kuleshov, V., Minaeva, M., Pokrovskii, B., 2006a. Isotopic signatures of deposition and transformation of Lower Cambrian saliferous rocks in the Irkutsk amphitheater: Communication 2. Strontium isotopic composition. Lithology Mineral Resources 41, 165–173. Vinogradov, V., Belenitskaya, G., Bujakaite, M., Kuleshov, V., Minaeva, M., Pokrovskii, B., 2006b. Isotopic signatures of deposition and transformation of Lower Cambrian saliferous rocks in the Irkutsk Amphitheater: Communication 3. Carbon and oxygen isotopic compositions in carbonates. Lithology Mineral Resources 41, 271–279. Walter, M.R., Veevers, J.J., Calver, C.R., Gorjan, P., Hill, A.C., 2000. Dating the 840-544 Ma Neoproterozoic interval by isotopes of strontium, carbon, and sulfur in seawater, and some interpretative models. Precamb. Res. 100, 371–433. Willman, S., Moczydlowska, M., 2008. Ediacaran acritarch biota from the Giles 1 drillhole, Officer Basin, Australia, and its potential for biostratigraphic correlation. Precamb. Res. 162, 498–530. Yang, J., Sun, W., Wang, Z., Xue, Y., Tao, X., 1999. Variations in Sr and C isotopes and Ce anomalies in successions from China: Evidence for the oxygenation of Neoproterozoic seawater? Precamb. Res. 93, 215–233. Zachos, J., Pagani, M., Sloan, L., Thomas, E., Billups, K., 2001. Trends, Rhythms, and Aberrations in Global Climate 65 Ma to Present. Science 292, 686–693. Zhu, M., Zhang, J., Yang, A., 2007. Integrated Ediacaran (Sinian) Chronostratigraphy of South China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 254, 7–61.

Table S1 supplementary material: Isotopic data used in this study. δ13C

Country

Location

Formation name

Sample name

Oman

Huqf

Ara

-

0.70918

2.0

Oman

Huqf

Buah

WBA76/1

0.70899

0.6

Oman

Huqf

Buah

WBA103

0.70884

2.2

Oman

Huqf

Buah

-

0.70921

-1.9

Oman

Huqf

Buah

-

0.70879

-0.2

Oman

Huqf

Buah

-

0.70889

0.0

Oman

Huqf

Buah

-

0.70876

-1.0

Oman

Huqf

Buah

-

0.70905

-1.3

Oman

Huqf

Buah

-

0.70880

-1.1

Oman

Huqf

Buah

-

0.70856

-5.0

Oman

Huqf

Buah

-

0.70867

-4.5

Oman

Huqf

Shuram

-

0.70859

-4.0

Oman

Huqf

Shuram

-

0.70873

-6.1

Oman

Huqf

Shuram

-

0.70876

-7.2

Oman

Huqf

Shuram

-

0.70852

-8.3

Oman

Jabal Akhdar

Khufai

1216

0.70800

1.7

Oman

Jabal Akhdar

Khufai

1211

0.70789

3.2

Oman

Jabal Akhdar

Khufai

1206

0.70791

5.7

Oman

Huqf

Khufai

-

0.70855

3.0

Oman

Huqf

Khufai

-

0.70844

2.3

Oman

Huqf

Khufai

-

0.70852

3.6

Oman

Huqf

Khufai

-

0.70840

3.2

Oman

Huqf

Khufai

-

0.70822

3.9

Oman

Huqf

Khufai

-

0.70801

4.2

Oman

Huqf

Khufai

-

0.70847

4.8

Oman

Huqf

Khufai

-

0.70843

3.5

Oman

Huqf

Khufai

-

0.70799

3.3

Oman

Huqf

Khufai

-

0.70844

3.7

Oman

Jabal Akhdar

Abu Mahara

-

0.70822

-1.7

Oman

Jabal Akhdar

Abu Mahara

-

0.70855

-0.7

Oman

Jabal Akhdar

Abu Mahara

-

0.70851

-0.9

Oman

Jabal Akhdar

Abu Mahara

-

0.70838

-0.5

Oman

Jabal Akhdar

Abu Mahara

-

0.70833

-0.6

Oman

Jabal Akhdar

Abu Mahara

-

0.70856

-1.0

China

Dengying

-

0.70999

2.4

China

Dengying

-

0.70937

2.7

China

Dengying

-

0.70999

2.5

China

Dengying

-

0.70989

3.2

China

Dengying

-

0.70847

2.6

China

Dengying

-

0.70841

2.9

China

Dengying

-

0.70872

3.0

China

Dengying

-

0.70916

1.5

China

Doushantuo

-

0.70847

-3.1

China

Doushantuo

-

0.70871

-1.2

China

Doushantuo

-

0.70950

-0.1

China

Doushantuo

-

0.70803

0.4

China

Doushantuo

-

0.70781

5.3

China

Doushantuo

-

0.70789

4.1

China

Doushantuo

-

0.70817

4.1

China

Doushantuo

-

0.70775

6.4

China

Doushantuo

-

0.70869

1.6

87

Sr/86Sr

‰ PDB

Data source Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Le Guerroué et al. (2006) Le Guerroué et al. (2006) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Le Guerroué et al. (2006) Le Guerroué et al. (2006) Le Guerroué et al. (2006) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Burns & Matter (1993) & Burns et al. (1994) Yang et al. (1999) Yang et al. (1999) Yang et al. (1999) Yang et al. (1999) Yang et al. (1999) Yang et al. (1999) Yang et al. (1999) Yang et al. (1999) Yang et al. (1999) Yang et al. (1999) Yang et al. (1999) Yang et al. (1999) Yang et al. (1999) Yang et al. (1999) Yang et al. (1999) Yang et al. (1999) Yang et al. (1999)

India

Tal

T4

0.70920

-2.5

India

Tal

T3

0.70980

-2.9

India

KrolE

KE2

0.71510

0.0

India

KrolE

KE1

0.71510

0.5

India

KrolD

KD3

0.70940

2.4

India

KrolD

KD2

0.70910

4.6

India

KrolD

KD1

0.70910

4.8

India

KrolC

KC6,1

0.71100

2.4

India

KrolC

KC6

0.70940

6.5

India

KrolC

KC5,1

0.71040

2.4

India

KrolC

KC

0.70880

2.1

India

KrolC

KC2

0.71220

2.1

Siberia

B. Zhigalovo

Middle Moty

cambrian

0,70863*

-4.0

Siberia

B. Zhigalovo

Middle Moty

cambrian

0,70868*

-3.5

Siberia

Chara River

Lower Sen

-

0.70730

-3.5

Siberia

Chara River

Sen

-

0.70990

-

Siberia

Chara River

Kumukulakh

-

0.70725

-2.9

Siberia

Chara River

Kumukulakh

-

0.70734

-2.9

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Barakun

-

0.70776

8.1

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Barakun

-

0.70790

7.2

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Barakun

-

0.70727

7.1

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Barakun

-

0.70952

6.0

Siberia

Berezovsk

Moldoun

-

0.70872

5.9

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Barakun

-

0.71051

4.6

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Barakun

-

0.70890

5.6

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Valyukhta

-

0.70781

5.9

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Valyukhta

-

0.70791

5.9

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Valyukhta

-

0.70769

5.1

Siberia

Berezovsk

Kalancha

-

0.71031

2.9

Siberia

Berezovsk

Kalancha

-

0.71055

3.2

Siberia

Berezovsk

Khalatyrbyt

-

0.71198

3.7

Siberia

Berezovsk

Khalatyrbyt

-

0.71067

3.6

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Valyukhta

-

0.70802

3.6

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Valyukhta

-

0.70920

5.1

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Nikol’skoe

-

0.70832

-10.8

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Nikol’skoe

-

0.70932

-10.2

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Nikol’skoe

-

0.70942

-10.8

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Nikol’skoe

-

0.70829

-12.5

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Nikol’skoe

-

0.70790

-13.3

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Nikol’skoe

-

0.70801

-13.5

Siberia

Berezovsk

Chencha

-

0.70823

-9.9

Siberia

Berezovsk

Chencha

-

0.70836

-9.4

Siberia

Chara River

Torgo

-

0.70917

-9.6

Siberia

Chara River

Torgo

-

0.70822

-10.4

Siberia

Chara River

Torgo

-

0.70810

-8.8

Siberia

Chara River

Torgo

-

0.70832

-9,0*

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Chencha

-

0.70813

-9.6

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Chencha

-

0.70874

-9.1

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Chencha

-

0.70812

-9.3

Siberia

Chara River

Torgo

-

0.70832

-8.9

Siberia

Chara River

Torgo

-

0.70799

-8.8

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Chencha

-

0.70855

-8.3

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Chencha

-

0.70826

-7.6

Siberia

Borehole 2730

Chencha

-

0.70836

-7,7*

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Chencha

-

0.70812

-7.8

Tewari & Sial (2007) Tewari & Sial (2007) Tewari & Sial (2007) Tewari & Sial (2007) Tewari & Sial (2007) Tewari & Sial (2007) Tewari & Sial (2007) Tewari & Sial (2007) Tewari & Sial (2007) Tewari & Sial (2007) Tewari & Sial (2007) Tewari & Sial (2007) Vinogradov (2006a, b) Vinogradov (2006a, b) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006)

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Chencha

-

0.70803

-7.7

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Chencha

-

0.70798

-8.2

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Chencha

-

0.70786

-7.7

Siberia

Chara River

Tinnaya

-

0.70837

-0.1

Siberia

Ura Uplift

Tn

-

0.70855

-0.5

Siberia

Borehole 1G

Torgo 3

-

0.71034

-10,0*

Siberia

Borehole 1G

Torgo 3

-

0.70836

-10,0*

Siberia

Borehole 1G

Torgo 3

-

0.71055

-10,0*

Siberia

Borehole 1G

Torgo 2

-

0.70860

-10,0*

Siberia

Borehole 1G

Alekseev

-

0.70975

4,0*

Siberia

Borehole 1G

Alekseev

-

0.71432

4,0*

Siberia

Borehole 1G

Alekseev

-

0.71103

4,0*

Australia

Buyneroo G.

Wonoka

-

0.70901

2.4

Australia

Officer Bassin

Narana

-

0.70886

-

Australia

Brachina G.

Wonoka

-

0.70874

-

Australia

First Hill

Wonoka

-

0.70883

-5.4

Australia

Brachina G.

Wonoka

-

0.70888

2.3

Australia

Brachina G.

Wonoka

-

0.70874

2.7

Australia

First Hill

Wonoka

-

0.70876

-6.5

Australia

First Hill

Wonoka

-

0.70876

-

Australia

Buyneroo G.

Wonoka

-

0.70876

-

Australia

Wonoka

-

0.70861

-7.3

Australia

Wonoka

-

0.70900

-7.5

Australia

Wonoka

-

0.70902

-7.4

Australia

Wonoka

-

0.70901

-

Australia

Buyneroo G.

Wonoka

-

0.70899

-6.3

Australia

Buyneroo G.

Wonoka

-

0.70876

-6.4

Australia

Buyneroo G.

Wonoka

-

0.70868

-7.7

Australia

Buyneroo G.

Wonoka

-

0.70888

-7.5

Australia

Buyneroo G.

Wonoka

-

0.70910

-7.5

Wonoka

-

0.71673

3.7

Australia Australia

Amadeus bassin

Julie

-

0.70843

-

Australia

Amadeus bassin

Julie

-

0.70836

-

Australia

Officer Bassin

Karlaya

-

0.70791

-

Australia

Bunyeroo

-

0.78002

-

Australia

Buyneroo

-

0.77825

-

Australia

Buyneroo

-

0.77165

-

Australia

Buyneroo

-

0.74299

-

Australia

Buyneroo

-

0.74241

-

Australia

Buyneroo

-

0.73966

-

Australia

Buyneroo

-

0.73947

-

Australia

Buyneroo

-

0.73385

-

Australia

Brachina

-

0.76928

-

Australia

Brachina

-

0.74394

-

Australia

Nuccaleena

-

0.71308

-3,0

Australia

Nuccaleena

-

0.70948

-

Australia

Nuccaleena

-

0.70966

-

Australia

Nuccaleena

-

0.70947

-2.4

Canada

Blueflower

N91-23K

0.70862

2.1

Canada

Blueflower

N91-23H

0.70861

1,0

Canada

Blueflower

N91-23F

0.70842

0.5

Canada

Blueflower

N91-23A

0.70855

2.2

Canada

Sheepbed

N91-21-25

0.70889

5.9

Canada

Tepee

N89-128A

0.70723

-4.6

Canada

Redstone

N98-1,00

0.71314

-1.9

Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Pokrovskii et al. (2006) Calver (2000) Calver & Lindsay (1998) Calver & Lindsay (1998) Calver (2000) Calver (2000) Calver (2000) Calver (2000) Calver & Lindsay (1998) Calver & Lindsay (1998) Foden et al. (2001) Foden et al. (2001) Foden et al. (2001) Foden et al. (2001) Calver (2000) Calver (2000) Calver (2000) Calver (2000) Calver (2000) Foden et al. (2001) Calver & Lindsay (1998) Calver & Lindsay (1998) Calver & Lindsay (1998) Foden et al. (2001) Foden et al. (2001) Foden et al. (2001) Foden et al. (2001) Foden et al. (2001) Foden et al. (2001) Foden et al. (2001) Foden et al. (2001) Foden et al. (2001) Foden et al. (2001) Calver (2000) Foden et al. (2001) Foden et al. (2001) Foden et al. (2001) Narbonne (1994) Narbonne (1994) Narbonne (1994) Narbonne (1994) Narbonne (1994) Narbonne (1994) James et al. (2001)

Canada

Redstone

N98-1,01

0.71586

-2.6

Canada

Redstone

N98-1,02

0.71288

-3,0

Canada

Redstone

N98-1,08

0.71863

-2.9

Canada

Redstone

N98-1,10

0.71702

-2.7

Canada

Redstone

N98-1,18

0.71746

-3.0

Canada

Redstone

N98-1,21

0.71317

-3.6

Canada

Redstone

N98-1,26

0.71183

-5.2

Canada

Redstone

N98-1,31

0.71848

-5.1

Canada

Redstone

N98-1,36

0.71749

-4.6

Canada

Redstone

N98-1,40

0.71915

-3.6

Canada

Shale L

N98-10E

0.70818

-4.2

Canada

Shale L

N98-10N

0.70766

-4.6

Canada

Shale L

N98-10P

0.70712

-4.6

Canada

Shale L

N98-11,0

0.71095

-3.4

Canada

Shale L

N98-11,13

0.71315

-3.4

Canada

Shale L

N98-11,17

0.70971

-4.9

Canada

Shale L

N98-11,2

0.71065

-3.1

Canada

Shale L

N98-11,20

0.70862

-4.9

Canada

Shale L

N98-11,4

0.71822

-2.7

Canada

Shale L

N98-11,7

0.71797

-2.8

Canada

Shale L

N98-12C(M)

0.71365

-1.2

Canada

Shale L

N98-12C(R)

0.70867

-1.3

Canada

Shale L

N98-12G

0.70753

-1.0

Canada

Ravensthroat

N98-20-10,3

0.70728

-2.3

Canada

Ravensthroat

N98-20-10,5

0.70735

-2.3

Namibia

Maieberg

F232

0.71059

1.5

Namibia

Maieberg

F220

0.70983

1.1

Namibia

Maieberg

F216

0.70782

3.0

Namibia

Maieberg

F213

0.70767

0.0

Namibia

Maieberg

F203

0.70766

-0.2

Namibia

Maieberg

F200

0.70860

4.0

Namibia

Maieberg

F196

0.70883

3.0

Namibia

Maieberg

F194

0.71098

1.5

Namibia

Maieberg

F183

0.70916

1.4

Namibia

Maieberg

F169

0.70987

2.0

Namibia

Maieberg

F135

0.70858

0.7

Namibia

Maieberg

F133

0.70803

0.9

Namibia

Maieberg

F130

0.70807

2.0

Namibia

Nama Group

SN102

0.70870

1.7

Namibia

Nama Group

SN103

0.70892

0.8

Namibia

Nama Group

GG76

0.70942

-1.2

Namibia

Nama Group

GG2B

0.70962

1.7

Namibia

Nama Group

GG3

0.70909

1.6

Namibia

Nama Group

SN75

0.70940

1.8

Namibia

Nama Group

SS17

0.70851

1.7

Namibia

Nama Group

SH12

0.70846

1.3

Namibia

Nama Group

NG91

0.70859

1.4

Namibia

Nama Group

SH43

0.70853

1.2

Namibia

Nama Group

NG90

0.70857

2.4

Namibia

Nama Group

SH54

0.70858

1.5

Namibia

Nama Group

NG87

0.70857

2.0

Namibia

Nama Group

NG86

0.70885

2.2

Namibia

Nama Group

SH49

0.70849

1.6

Namibia

Nama Group

NG85

0.70858

-0.8

Namibia

Nama Group

NG84

0.70871

-0.5

James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) James et al. (2001) Kennedi et al. (1998) Kennedi et al. (1998) Kennedi et al. (1998) Kennedi et al. (1998) Kennedi et al. (1998) Kennedi et al. (1998) Kennedi et al. (1998) Kennedi et al. (1998) Kennedi et al. (1998) Kennedi et al. (1998) Kennedi et al. (1998) Kennedi et al. (1998) Kennedi et al. (1998) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993)

Namibia

Nama Group

NG83

0.70852

0.1

Namibia

Nama Group

NG81

0.70868

0.1

Namibia

Nama Group

NG/N2

0.70849

0.2

Namibia

Nama Group

KS145

0.70854

3.0

Namibia

Nama Group

KM0115

0.70928

6.6

Namibia

Nama Group

KM0116

0.70953

5.3

Namibia

Nama Group

K0140

0.70884

2.8

Namibia

Nama Group

K0137

0.70840

2.1

Mongolia

19

Tsagaan Oloom

96TST35

0.70716

3.9

Mongolia

19

Tsagaan Oloom

96TST37

0.70729

4.9

Mongolia

19

Tsagaan Oloom

96TST42

0.70713

8.3

Tsagaan Oloom

T9

0.70729

6.9

Tsagaan Oloom

96TST55

0.70734

9.5

Mongolia

Tsagaan Oloom

Tsag.19-TS7

0.70735

9,5*

Mongolia

Tsagaan Oloom

Tsag.20-TS8

0.70725

9,5*

Mongolia

Tsagaan Oloom

Tsag. 11

0.70827

9,5*

Tsagaan Oloom

96TST66

0.70729

7,4

Tsagaan Oloom

Tsag.20-TS9

0.70725

5,5*

Mongolia Mongolia

Mongolia

19

19

Mongolia Mongolia

Tsagaan Oloom

96TST69

0.70735

9.2

Mongolia

Tsagaan Oloom

Tsag.20-TSI0

0.70769

6,0*

Mongolia

Tsagaan Oloom

Tsag, 12

0.70786

6,0*

Mongolia

Tsagaan Oloom

Tsag,13

0.70830

6,0*

Mongolia

Tsagaan Oloom

Tsag,14

0.70836

6,0*

Mongolia

Tsagaan Oloom

Tsag, 16

0.70789

6,0*

Tsagaan Oloom

96TST71

0.70725

2.4

Mongolia

Tsagaan Oloom

KTN 1

0.70786

4,0*

Mongolia

Tsagaan Oloom

KTN2

0.70810

4,0*

Mongolia

Tsagaan Oloom

Tsag,21

0.70787

3,0*

Mongolia

Tsagaan Oloom

KTN3

0.70805

3,0*

Mongolia

Tsagaan Oloom

KTN4

0.70812

3,0*

Mongolia

Tsagaan Oloom

Bay Sla

0.70864

2,0*

Mongolia

Tsagaan Oloom

Bay SO

0.70853

2,0*

Mongolia

Tsagaan Oloom

Tsag,20

0.70842

1,0*

Mongolia

Tsagaan Oloom

BayS4

0.70853

1,0*

Mongolia

Tsagaan Oloom

BayS5

0.70843

1,0* 1,0

Mongolia

19

19

Mongolia

20

Tsagaan Oloom

96TST75

0.70725

Mongolia

22

Tsagaan Oloom

96TST77

0.70769

1,0

Mongolia

Cambrian

Tsagaan Oloom

Tsag,24

0.70855

0,0*

Mongolia

Cambrian

Tsagaan Oloom

Bay, By 02

0.70843

0,0*

Mongolia

Cambrian

Tsagaan Oloom

Bay, Bd14

0.70849

0,0*

Mongolia

Cambrian

Tsagaan Oloom

Bay 2

0.70856

-1,0*

Mongolia

Cambrian

Tsagaan Oloom

Bay 4

0.70844

-1,0*

Mongolia

Cambrian

Tsagaan Oloom

Bay 33

0.70846

-2,0*

Mongolia

Cambrian

Tsagaan Oloom

Tsag,25

0.70848

-2,0*

Mongolia

Cambrian

Tsagaan Oloom

Bay 40

0.70857

-2,0*

Mongolia

Cambrian

Tsagaan Oloom

Bay 42

0.70865

-4*

Mongolia

Cambrian

Tsagaan Oloom

Bay 44

0.70850

-4*

Mongolia

Cambrian

Tsagaan Oloom

Tsag,26

0.70869

-3,0*

Mongolia

Cambrian

Tsagaan Oloom

Tsag,28

0.70843

-3,0*

Mongolia

Cambrian

Tsagaan Oloom

Tsag, 31

0.70854

-2,0*

Mongolia

Cambrian

Tsagaan Oloom

Tsag,32

0.70889

-1,0*

Mongolia

Cambrian

Tsagaan Oloom

Tsag,34

0.70873

0,0*

Scandinavia

Nestbyfjellet

Leivset marble

1

0.70872

-6.6

Scandinavia

Nestbyfjellet

Leivset marble

2

0.70871

-6.7

Scandinavia

Nestbyfjellet

Leivset marble

6

0.70859

-6.3

Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Kaufman et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Brasier et al. (1993) Melezhik et al. (2008) Melezhik et al. (2008) Melezhik et al. (2008)

Scandinavia

Nestbyfjellet

Leivset marble

9

0.70858

-6.2

Scandinavia

Nestbyfjellet

Leivset marble

13

0.70862

-6.5

Scandinavia

Nestbyfjellet

Leivset marble

14

0.70870

-8.5

Scandinavia

Nestbyfjellet

Leivset marble

15

0.70857

-7.5

Scandinavia

Nestbyfjellet

Leivset marble

16

0.70877

-7.9

Scandinavia

Nestbyfjellet

Leivset marble

17

0.70889

-7.9

Scandinavia

Nestbyfjellet

Leivset marble

18

0.70866

-8.1

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

cap

0.70795

-8.9

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

cap

0.70798

-6.8

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

cap

0.70744

-4.5

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

Mira-01

0.70852

-4.3

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

cap

0.70765

-4.9

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

cap

0.70781

-4.2

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

cap

0.70774

-5.1

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

Cac-16

0.70753

-2.7

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

cap

0.70827

-3.9

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

cap

0.70852

-5.2

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

cap

0.70843

-4.2

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

Mira-06

0.70848

-7.0

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

cap

0.70904

-4.6

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

cap

0.70953

-3.6

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

cap

0.71129

-4.9

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

cap

0.71120

-8.1

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

Mira-09

0.70803

-4.6

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

cap

0.70811

-5.1

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

cap

0.70711

-4.7

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

Cac-09

0.70754

-1.6

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

cap

0.70766

-5.1

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

cap

0.70795

-5.0

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

cap

0.70764

-4.9

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

TG-25

0.70740

-4.9

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste BX-10-124/4-11

0.70763

-1.9

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

cap

0.70783

-4.7

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

Cac-06

0.70761

-1.4

Brazil

Mirassol d'Oeste

Araras-27

0.70982

2.2

Brazil

Guia

NB-24

0.70767

0.1

Brazil

Guia

NB-10

0.70776

-0.9

Brazil

Guia

NB-12

0.70780

-0.7

Brazil

Serra do Quilombo

-

0.70797

-1.6

Brazil

Serra do Quilombo

Araras-23

0.70854

2.7

Brazil

Serra do Quilombo

-

0.70849

-1.6

Brazil

Serra do Quilombo

Araras-20

0.70734

1.9

Brazil

Serra do Quilombo

-

0.70891

-0.9

Brazil

Serra do Quilombo

-

0.70823

-0.4

Brazil

Serra do Quilombo

-

0.70869

0.2

Brazil

Nobres

Araras-13

0.70875

2.7

Brazil

Nobres

-

0.70852

0.1

Brazil

Nobres

-

0.70850

-0.8

Brazil

Nobres

-

0.70813

-1.3

Brazil

Nobres

Araras-04

0.70870

1.8

Brazil

Nobres

-

0.70858

-1.6

Brazil

Nobres

Araras-01B

0.70960

9.6

Brazil

Nobres

-

0.70882

-2.2

Brazil

Nobres

-

0.70818

-1.0

Brazil

Nobres

Araras-31

0.70907

-1.0

Melezhik et al. (2008) Melezhik et al. (2008) Melezhik et al. (2008) Melezhik et al. (2008) Melezhik et al. (2008) Melezhik et al. (2008) Melezhik et al. (2008) Nogueira et al. (2007) Nogueira et al. (2007) Nogueira et al. (2007) De Alvarenga et al. (2004) Nogueira et al. (2007) Nogueira et al. (2007) Nogueira et al. (2007) De Alvarenga et al. (2004) Nogueira et al. (2007) Nogueira et al. (2007) Nogueira et al. (2007) De Alvarenga et al. (2004) Nogueira et al. (2007) Nogueira et al. (2007) Nogueira et al. (2007) Nogueira et al. (2007) De Alvarenga et al. (2004) Nogueira et al. (2007) Nogueira et al. (2007) De Alvarenga et al. (2004) Nogueira et al. (2007) Nogueira et al. (2007) Nogueira et al. (2007) Nogueira et al. (2007) Nogueira et al. (2007) Nogueira et al. (2007) De Alvarenga et al. (2004) De Alvarenga et al. (2004) De Alvarenga et al. (2008) De Alvarenga et al. (2008) De Alvarenga et al. (2008) Nogueira et al. (2007) De Alvarenga et al. (2004) Nogueira et al. (2007) De Alvarenga et al. (2004) Nogueira et al. (2007) Nogueira et al. (2007) Nogueira et al. (2007) De Alvarenga et al. (2004) Nogueira et al. (2007) Nogueira et al. (2007) Nogueira et al. (2007) De Alvarenga et al. (2004) Nogueira et al. (2007) De Alvarenga et al. (2004) Nogueira et al. (2007) Nogueira et al. (2007) De Alvarenga et al. (2004)

Brazil

Nobres

-

0.70880

-0.6

Nogueira et al. (2007)

* recalculated from original illustration

references: Brasier, M. D., G. Shields, et al. (1996). "Integrated chemo- and biostratigraphic calibration of early animal evolution; NeoproterozoicEarly Cambrian of Southwest Mongolia." Geological Magazine 133(4): 445-485. Burns, S. J., U. Haudenschild, et al. (1994). "The strontium isotopic composition of carbonates from the late Precambrian (~ 560-540 Ma) Huqf Group of Oman." Chemical Geology 111(1-4): 269-282. Burns, S. J. and A. Matter (1993). "Carbon isotopic record of the latest Proterozoic from Oman." Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae 86(2): 595-607. Calver, C. R. (2000). "Isotope stratigraphy of the Ediacaran (Neoproterozoic III) of the Adelaide Rift Complex, Australia, and the overprint of water column stratification." Precambrian Research 100: 121-150. Calver, C. R. and J. F. Lindsay (1998). "Ediacarian sequence and isotope stratigraphy of the Officer Basin, South Australia." Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 45: 513-532. De Alvarenga, C. J. S., M. A. Dardenne, et al. (2008). "Isotope stratigraphy of Neoproterozoic cap carbonates in the Araras Group, Brazil." Gondwana Research 13(4): 469-479. De Alvarenga, C. J. S., R. V. Santos, et al. (2004). "C-O-Sr isotopic stratigraphy of cap carbonates overlying Marinoan-age glacial diamictites in the Paraguay Belt, Brazil." Precambrian Research 131(1-2): 1-21. Foden, J., K. Barovich, et al. (2001). "Sr-isotopic evidence for Late Neoproterozoic rifting in the Adelaide Geosyncline at 586 Ma: implications for a Cu ore forming fluid flux." Precambrian Research 106: 291-308. James, N. P., G. M. Narbonne, et al. (2001). "Late Neoproterozoic cap carbonates: Mackenzie Mountains, northwestern Canada: precipitation and global glacial meltdown." Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 38: 1229–1262. Kaufman, A. J., S. B. Jacobsen, et al. (1993). "The Vendian record of Sr and C isotopic variations in seawater: Implications for tectonics and palaeoclimate." Earth and Planetary Science Letters 120: 409-430. Kennedy, M. J., B. Runnegar, et al. (1998). "Two or four Neoproterozoic glaciations?" Geology 26(12): 1059-1063. Nova 18(2): 147-153. Melezhik, V. A., D. Roberts, et al. (2008). "The Shuram-Wonoka event recorded in a high-grade metamorphic terrane: insight from the Scandinavian Caledonides." Geological Magazine 145(2): 161-172. Narbonne, G. M. (1994). "New Ediacaran Fossils from the Mackenzie Mountains, Northwestern Canada." Journal of Paleontology 68(3): 411-416. Nogueira, A. C. R., C. Riccomini, et al. (2007). "Carbon and strontium isotope fluctuations and paleoceanographic changes in the late Neoproterozoic Araras carbonate platform, southern Amazon craton, Brazil." Chemical Geology 237 168–190. Pokrovskii, B. G., V. A. Melezhik, et al. (2006). "Carbon, Oxygen, Strontium, and Sulfur isotopic compositions in late Precambrian rocks of the Patom Complex, central Siberia: Communication 1. results, isotope stratigraphy, and dating problems." Lithology and Mineral Resources 41(5): 450-474. Tewari, V. C. and A. N. Sial (2007). "Neoproterozoic-Early Cambrian isotopic variation and chemostratigraphy of the Lesser Himalaya, India, Eastern Gondwana." Chemical Geology 237: 64-88. Vinogradov, V., G. Belenitskaya, et al. (2006). "Isotopic signatures of deposition and transformation of Lower Cambrian saliferous rocks in the Irkutsk amphitheater: Communication 2. Strontium isotopic composition." Lithology and Mineral Resources 41: 165-173. Vinogradov, V., G. Belenitskaya, et al. (2006). "Isotopic signatures of deposition and transformation of Lower Cambrian saliferous rocks in the Irkutsk Amphitheater: Communication 3. Carbon and oxygen isotopic compositions in carbonates." Lithology and Mineral Resources 41: 271-279. Yang, J., W. Sun, et al. (1999). "Variations in Sr and C isotopes and Ce anomalies in successions from China: evidence for the oxygenation of Neoproterozoic seawater?" Precambrian Research 93(2-3): 215–233.