THAILAND

GRADING SYSTEM North America

BBA International Program CHULALONGKORN BUSINESS SCHOOL THAILAND

Grading System – North America

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Canada ..............................................................................................3 1.1 Hec Montreal .......................................................................... 3 1.2 McGill University ..................................................................... 3 1.3 Simon Fraser University .......................................................... 4 1.4 Queen’s University at Kingston ............................................... 4 1.5 University of British Columbia ................................................ 5 1.6 University of Calgary ............................................................... 5 1.7 University of Ottawa ............................................................... 6 1.8 University of Toronto .............................................................. 6 1.9 University of Victoria............................................................... 7 1.10

York University ..................................................................... 7

2. United States of America ..................................................................8 2.1 Baruch College, The City University of New York (CUNY) ....... 8 2.2 California State University at Fresno ...................................... 8 2.3 Grand Valley State University ................................................. 8 2.4 New York University (NYU) ..................................................... 9 2.5 Michigan State University (MSU) ............................................ 9 2.6 Oklahoma State University ..................................................... 9 2.7 Oregon State University ........................................................ 10 2.8 San Diego State University .................................................... 10 2.9 San Francisco State University .............................................. 11 2.10

San Jose State University ................................................... 11

2.11

University of Florida ........................................................... 11

2.12

University of Hawaii at Manoa ........................................... 12

2.13

University of Maryland ....................................................... 12

BBA INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM CHULALONGKORN BUSINESS SCHOOL

1

Grading System – North America 2.14

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill ........................ 13

2.15

University of Northern Colorado........................................ 13

2.16

University of Southern California ....................................... 14

2.17

University of Wisconsin-Madison ...................................... 14

BBA INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM CHULALONGKORN BUSINESS SCHOOL

2

Grading System – North America Each student should be assigned a single letter grade highlighted in pink equivalent to C Chula grade at the end of each course by the course instructor as following universities:

1. CANADA 1.1 HEC MONTREAL Numerical value/Mark 4.3 A+ 4.0 A 3.7 A‐ 3.3 B+ 3.0 B 2.7 B‐ 2.3 C+ 2.0 C 1.7 C‐ 1.3 D+ 1.0 D 0 E

Evaluation Exceptional Excellent Very good Good Fair Fail

1.2 MCGILL UNIVERSITY Grades Grade Points Numerical Scale A 4.0 85 – 100% A3.7 80 – 84% B+ 3.3 75 – 79% B 3.0 70 – 74% B2.7 65 – 69% C+ 2.3 60 – 64% C 2.0 55 – 59% D 1.0 50 – 54% F (Fail) 0 0 – 49%

BBA INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM CHULALONGKORN BUSINESS SCHOOL

3

Grading System – North America 1.3 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Letter Grade Numerical Equivalent A+ 4.33 A 4.00 A3.67 B+ 3.33 B 3.00 B2.67 C+ 2.33 C 2.00 C1.67 C1.67 D 1.00 F 0.00

Definition Excellent Good

Satisfactory Marginal Fail

1.4 QUEEN’S UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON Grade Numerical Range Grade Point Equivalent A+ 90-100 4.3 A 85-89 4.0 A80-84 3.7 B+ 77-79 3.3 B 73-76 3.0 B70-72 2.7 C+ 67-69 2.3 C 63-66 2.0 C60-62 1.7 D+ 57-59 1.3 D 53-56 1.0 D50-52 0.7 F 49 and below 0.0

BBA INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM CHULALONGKORN BUSINESS SCHOOL

4

Grading System – North America 1.5 UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Percentage (%) Letter Grade 90-100 A+ 85-89 A 80-84 A76-79 B+ 72-75 B 68-71 B64-67 C+ 60-63 C 55-59 C50-54 D 0-49 F (Fail) 1.6 UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Grade Grade Point Value Description A+ 4.00 Outstanding A 4.00 Excellent A3.70 B+ 3.30 B 3.00 Good B2.70 C+ 2.30 C 2.00 Satisfactory C1.70 D+ 1.30 D 1.00 Minimal pass F 0 Fail

BBA INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM CHULALONGKORN BUSINESS SCHOOL

5

Grading System – North America 1.7 UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA Letter grade Numerical value A+ 10 A 9 A8 B+ 7 B 6 C+ 5 C 4 D+ 3 D 2 E 1 F 0

Percentage scale value 90-100 85-89 80-84 75-79 70-74 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 40-49* 0-39

1.8 UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO Percentage Letter Grade Grade Point Value 90-100 A+ 4.0 85-89 A 4.0 80-84 A3.7 77-79 B+ 3.3 73-76 B 3.0 70-72 B2.7 67-69 C+ 2.3 63-66 C 2.0 60-62 C1.7 57-59 D+ 1.3 53-56 D 1.0 50-52 D0.7 0-49 F 0.0

BBA INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM CHULALONGKORN BUSINESS SCHOOL

Grade Definition Excellent Good Adequate

Marginal Inadequate

6

Grading System – North America 1.9 UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Grade Grade Point Value Percentage A+ 9 90 - 100 A 8 85 - 89 A7 80 - 84 B+ 6 77 - 79 B 5 73 - 76 BC+ C D F

4 3 2 1 0

70 - 72 65 - 69 60 - 64 50 - 59 0 - 49

1.10 YORK UNIVERSITY From Percentage To Letter Grade 90-100 A+ 80-89 A 75-79 B+ 70-74 B 65-69 C+ 60-64 C 55-59 D+ 50-54 D 40-49 E 0-39 F

Description Exceptional Work Outstanding Work Excellent Work Very good work Acceptable work that fulfills the expectations of the course Unacceptable work revealing some deficiencies in knowledge, understanding or techniques Failing grade

Grade Point 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

BBA INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM CHULALONGKORN BUSINESS SCHOOL

7

Grading System – North America

2. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2.1 BARUCH COLLEGE, THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK (CUNY) Letter Grades and Grade Point Equivalents A 4.0 93.0–100.0 A3.7 90.0–92.9 B+ 3.3 87.1–89.9 B 3.0 83.0–87.0 B2.7 80.0–82.9 C+ 2.3 77.1–79.9 C 2.0 73.0–77.0 C1.7 70.0–72.9 D+ 1.3 67.1–69.9 D 1.0 60.0–67.0 F 0.0 below 60.0 2.2 CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY AT FRESNO Grade Explanation Points A Excellent 4.0 B Good 3.0 C Average 2.0 D Passing 1.0 F Failing 0.0 2.3 GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY Grade Quality Points A 4.0 A3.7 B+ 3.3 B 3.0 B2.7 C+ 2.3 C 2.0 C1.7 D+ 1.3 D 1.0 F 0.0 BBA INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM CHULALONGKORN BUSINESS SCHOOL

8

Grading System – North America 2.4 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY (NYU) Letter Grade Legend A Excellent AExcellent B+ Good B Good BGood C+ Satisfactory C Satisfactory CSatisfactory D+ Minimum Passing Grade D Minimum Passing Grade F Failure

Quality Points 4.0 3.7 3.3 3.0 2.7 2.3 2.0 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.0

2.5 MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY (MSU) The Numerical System 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.0 2.6 OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY Grade Note Point/Hour A Excellent 4 B Good 3 C Average 2 D Below average 1 F Failure 0

BBA INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM CHULALONGKORN BUSINESS SCHOOL

9

Grading System – North America 2.7 OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY Grade Grade Points Notation A 4.0 Exceptional A3.7 B+ 3.3 B 3.0 Superior B2.7 C+ 2.3 C 2.0 Average C1.7 D+ 1.3 D 1.0 Inferior D0.7 F 0.0 Failure 2.8 SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY Grade Points A 4.0 A3.7 B+ 3.3 B 3.0 B2.7 C+ 2.3 C 2.0 C1.7 D+ 1.3 D 1.0 D0.7 F 0.0

BBA INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM CHULALONGKORN BUSINESS SCHOOL

10

Grading System – North America 2.9 SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY Grade Points A 4.0 A3.7 B+ 3.3 B 3.0 B2.7 C+ 2.3 C 2.0 C1.7 D+ 1.3 D 1.0 D0.7 F 0.0 2.10 SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY Grade Symbol Grade Value A+ 4.0 A 4.0 A3.7 B+ 3.3 B 3.0 B2.7 C+ 2.3 C 2.0 C1.7 D+ 1.3 D 1.0 D0.7 F 0 2.11 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA Passing Grade A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D+ D Grade Points 4.0 3.67 3.33 3.0 2.67 2.33 2.0 1.67 1.33 1.0

BBA INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM CHULALONGKORN BUSINESS SCHOOL

D- S 0.67 0

11

Grading System – North America 2.12 UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA

Letter Grade A+ A AB+ B BC+ C CD+ D DF-

Grade Points 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.3 3.0 2.7 2.3 2.0 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.0

2.13 UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Grade Grade Policy A+, A 4.0 A3.7 B+ 3.3 B 3.0 B2.7 C+ 2.3 C 2.0 C1.7 D+ 1.3 D 1.0 D0.7 F 0.0

BBA INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM CHULALONGKORN BUSINESS SCHOOL

12

Grading System – North America 2.14 UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL Grade points A 4.0 A3.7 B+ 3.3 B 3.0 B2.7 C+ 2.3 C 2.0 C1.7 D+ 1.3 D 1.0 F 0.0 2.15 UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO Standard Grading Quality Points A = superior 4.00 A- = A minus 3.67 B+ = B plus 3.34 B = above average 3.00 B- = B minus 2.67 C+ = C plus 2.34 C = average 2.00 C- = C minus 1.67 D+ = D plus 1.34 D = poor, passing 1.00 D- = D minus, passing 0.67 F = failure 0.00

BBA INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM CHULALONGKORN BUSINESS SCHOOL

13

Grading System – North America 2.16 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Letter Grade Grade Point A 4.0 A3.7 B+ 3.3 B 3.0 B2.7 C+ 2.3 C 2.0 C1.7 D+ 1.3 D 1.0 D0.7 F 0.0 2.17 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON Grade Grade Points Per Credit A (Excellent) 4 AB (Intermediate grade) 3.5 B (Good) 3 BC (Intermediate grade) 2.5 C (Fair) 2 D (Poor) 1 F (Failure, see section below) 0

BBA INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM CHULALONGKORN BUSINESS SCHOOL

14

Grading system - North America.pdf

Page 1 of 15. GRADING. SYSTEM. THAILAND. North America. BBA International Program. CHULALONGKORN BUSINESS SCHOOL. THAILAND. Page 1 of 15 ...

602KB Sizes 57 Downloads 181 Views

Recommend Documents

Grading system - Asia.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. Grading system ...

Grading system - Europe.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. Grading system ...

Grading system - Europe.pdf
Page 2 of 25. BBA INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM. CHULALONGKORN BUSINESS SCHOOL 1. Grading System – Europe. THAILAND. TABLE OF CONTENTS.

Grading system - Australia & New Zealand.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. Grading system ...

Grading Guidelines.pdf
Whoops! There was a problem loading this page. Whoops! There was a problem loading this page. Grading Guidelines.pdf. Grading Guidelines.pdf. Open.

Oral Presentation Grading Rubric
Nonverbal Skills. 4 – Exceptional. 3 – Admirable. 2 – Acceptable. 1 – Poor. Eye Contact. Holds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact ...

Grading Manual.pdf
Appendix H: PowerSchool Parent Acceptable Use ... Leslie Dowling Roberta Montgomery Angela Tomlin-Hart ... Dana Fall Mary Kay Norton Dana Williams.

10 point grading scale
9th graders earn “quality points” for taking courses at a more rigorous level. Students in grades 10-12 will continue to earn quality points the same as in years ...

Grading Policy.pdf
Grading Policy.pdf. Grading Policy.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu. Displaying Grading Policy.pdf. Page 1 of 1.

Grading
Candidates use sources of information to research career areas ... career areas, giving sound information on how ... likely to be in the form of a list. Candidates ...

Discrimination in Grading - Leigh Linden
human capital investments (Mechtenberg 2009; Tajfel 1970; Arrow 1972; Coate and. Loury 1993). Additionally, since such external evaluations are often used to deter- mine access .... discrimination against black children in Brazil. While these studies

grading-plan-view.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item.

WHS Grading Policy.pdf
20% - Minor Assignments (homework, classwork, worksheets, formative quizzes, etc.) will be weighted at 20%. Completing these assignments is critical to a student's success. on a major assessment. ○ NOTE: The EOC will factor in as 20% of a student's

10 point grading scale - PTSA
Beginning this school year, 2015-16, the state board of education requires all school districts to implement a new grading scale. This new scale applies to ...

TOEIC Grading Rubric.pdf
is generally intelligible and coherent, with some fluidity of expression though it exhibits some. noticeable lapses in the expression of ideas. Response is ...

Grading Permit Process
Permit Package includes but is not limited to: 1. 2 Sets of approved Civil Plans or 2 Grading Plans signed by City Engineer and Building Official. 2. CC Desert Conservation Program Mitigation Fee Form (Tortoise Form). 3. 1 permit application with all

Updated Draft - Grading Philosophy.pdf
and performance criteria. 4. Behaviors (e.g., attendance, on task behavior, time management, working with peers). should be reported separately from academic ...

Grading Procedures 2016-2017.pdf
Mr. Trent's Classroom Grading Procedures ... Any work not handed in by the last day of the term will earn a ... Displaying Grading Procedures 2016-2017.pdf.

Grading Standards Chemistry 3202 June 2009
Many students did not use the bond energy formula correctly. They added 184.6. kJ (the ∆H for the reaction) to the product bond energy and then subtracted the.

Imperialism*Poster*Presentation*Grading*Rubric
Imperialism*Poster*Presentation*Grading*Rubric:* ! *. *. Topic: **Period: *. Student*Names:* ! : ! ! : ! ! : ! ! : ! ! : ! ! : ! ! Criterion:* Descriptor:* *. *. *. *. *. Points:*.

PE Grading Policy (Syllabus).pdf
or white t-shirt or school PE uniform,) athletic shoes, socks, lock, clean up kit, including. soap, deodorant, band aids, safety pins, hair ties, sunscreen, feminine protection. Sweats at. teacher discretion ONLY! YOUR UNIFORM IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY!

Library Practice Grading Rubric
sign-in, counter neat, stamp clean. Consistently is willing to dust and vacuum. Picks up trash and cleans tables. Puts items in their proper place. Generally keeps.

Landlady Extended Ending Grading Rubric.pdf
157. Whoops! There was a problem loading this page. Retrying... Landlady Extended Ending Grading Rubric.pdf. Landlady Extended Ending Grading Rubric.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu. Displaying Landlady Extended Ending Grading Rubric