ane•lith (n. , adj.) — a metaphor descriptive of feeling the transience (“breathing”) of the immediate moment, though solid (“stone”) it may seem. The motive sprung from the exorbitance of digitally remembered, seemingly solidified moments, from the environment radically filled with sophisticated information. In an effort towards unlimiting correspondence and sharing the experience of careful self-renunciation, before you are projects in art, philosophy, literacy.

Infinitesimal

The English language is a withstanding soil of coexistence. Lingual spaces of its origin have been conquered before, nourishing its layered etymological regrowth. Enveloped with multidimensional information, in the teen years of the millennium, projected human dreams are competing for attention. Dreams have faces, dreams have control, dreams want to survive. Among the literate, rooting through the concrete of terminal algorithms dreamt, proceeds imperfection, confirming the branching of paths towards discovery. Yet many strive to align, surveil and remember all by means of digits. Decay of the dreams is an observed reminder of transience in its infinity. Decay of digits is harder to believe in.

Exorbitance of remembering time, of recording fluidity in digits, often naively called streaming, presupposes relying on the “precisely, truthfully” recording technology. Understanding the world through these forms of perfection, recording in time coded screen media, dissolves memory, the most fertile soil of the ever-imperfect language, bringing the choice of living in a prophesied, virtual, endless reflection of the obvious self.

The work here is towards selective exposure throughout language and careful learning or choice of words in a world augmented by digital ways of recording, words of process and fluidity, towards dissolving the limits of solidity in selflessness and regenerating clear thought in attentive listening. A stone breathing in the time traceless. Dying.

Andrey Milyayev, 2017 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

http://metalanguage.anelith.com

I. The Environment of Language Is Imperfect

The learner seeks to nourish creative motivation by collecting a multiplicity of expressive metaphors for the non-duality and endlessness of learning. The hoping is for a dehiscence (release, breath) of the metalanguage as symbolism (etymologically “a throwing together”) of unlimiting kind, a dehiscence of symbols towards preserving openness to the unknown. For this the learner turns to exploring the environment the language is shaped by, working towards the infinity of change in the environment being represented in the regenerating multiplicity of shape and meaning in language. The central etymological wisdom of this text is cherished by the learner through the word imperfection. Word-forming elements over time come together to put before us the choice of using this word in the context of learning:

“The language I am writing in does not belong to me. Breathing through everything, being past nothing. Once life existed without us. Every thing is an instance of eternity. Learning is imperfect.”

Source: Anelith.com

An essential mode of inquiry here is to make a spectre of meaning blossoming from the word-forming element “meta” more tactile to the mind. Among these may be found understandings like “after”, “beyond”, “about (smth.)”, “change” and even a Ukrainian “мета” meaning “aim”. Having considered this fluid, nearly intuitive multidimensionality of these letters together, by putting the words in such an order as “Metalanguage towards” the researcher means to signal that the word metalanguage means an undergoing; also meaning to highlight an experience of identity that can only be defined in the ever-open system of spectral and infinite human correspondent learning, where meaning beyond any symbol is never solidified.

Remaining rooted in language, even in perceived solitude human minds light the paths to confluence with the organon beyond what is authenticated as human by the means of language, reliving the biologically balanced origination of human consciousness. Learning to light ourselves to others makes the mind articulate in seeing it’s own evolvement, the irreplicable growth of dimensions where it is splitting down and emerging throughout “matter”. It may prove of use to the reader to consider the root of the word matter, also forming mother and matrix, as only existing in the infinite wisdom of language formation, and to unfold it’s multiplicity in structuring and improvising a personal metalanguage. For instance, saying that one is obtaining something could help interpret to the addressee the selflessness coming from self-knowledge, to emphasise one knowing oneself to be a mere instance in the endlessness.

Akin to many works of philosophy before, the Metalanguage Towards Imperfection is an experience of thought on accepting death, decay or dissolvement with equanimity. It is put near by context with the word education, because the learner reasons the directionality through to be a way of “leading out” (Latin ex- ducere), as well as understanding that any action and especially inaction is inevitably teaching the nearby meshworking of kinship.

II. Language of Choice

This work on revitalisation of thought diversity was inspired by travelling in civilisation: observing the past and the future of the process of civilisation by living first in the “developing”, then in the “developed”, and then back in the “developing” world. Witnessing how the process of civilisation is inevitably a way of changing the thinking, rather then a straightforward utilitarian advancement, the learner had to accept that “true” representation (of reality or nature) is impossible and that choice is inevitable. Words thought, growing into words spoken, define where one chooses to direct the space of dialogue. Chosen personal metalanguages constitute the diversity of thinking in our environment of thought.

Imagination is the openness (of symbol) to new association, mobility of intelligence. Seeing past the words said directly to one is the skill of a multilingual corresponding. Self-correction in a flow of inclusive characterisation brings forth a multiplicity of descriptive devices, one cultural context refining the articulation through the other; resulting in a precision of means or “sharpness of mind”.

In a comparable way understanding the relatedness of sensory experiences, something studied under a term “synaesthesia”, can be of use to the process of correspondence, drawing connections and bringing a more fluid sense of a person’s idea underneath the mediations. For instance, an idea expressed visually can be interpreted sonically, according visual features like sharp corners or smooth lines with features of sound waves sculpted alike sharply or soothingly.

The two ways of looking at language listed above illustrate the performative nature of intelligence, knowing oneself through knowing for oneself. Environmental practice and cultural knowledge carried through language, the ubiquitous human behaviour, can either be geared towards linguistic solipsism (thinking that knowledge can be contained in media) or towards subsidence of self as an agent being. Both directionalities, either trying to control everything or not trying to control anything, used radically are a great threat to humanity. And while the former “selfish” directionality is about utilitarianism and comfortism (the willingness to secure and hold) remains invested in, the latter requires perceivable social and economic sacrifices. Counterculture is engrowing, rooting. Two bodies together, unequal in volume might represent equanimity, for the choice of subsiding or enlarging is at the heart. The aim of this work is to foreground the reasoning for the effort of representing transience (selflessness) in language, and present it as a possible way towards a more balanced discovery.

It is easiest to start here by pointing out the recurring attempts of the human mind at solidifying knowledge, making it permanently correct or totally ubiquitous. To think critically of this one may render the anthropocentric notions of totalitarianism as a thinking directionality towards one solution being ubiquitously correct or the whole (not synergy) being at the inception, and then have an etymological insight into only one word construct in a technocentric metalanguage used when talking about artificial intelligence — “metasolution”.

Hypothetically full environing with the known ground (imagining that everything is virtual, perfected, known), gives clarifying advantages to the process of tying this work together. The question “What if everything was virtual (artificial)?” can be of use when sketching performance in the environment where information is laying in the pattern (soothing or sharp) of the concrete flooring the streets are being paved in.

In the context of thinking critically about prophecy and its strength, one could consider what naming the person before his or her birth could do to the development and learning of that person (in context). To give a counterargument, the “positive, helpful” connotation of the word antibiotic serves among the examples of the overpowering viscosity of “context”.

“Nourished from outside of control proceeds the decay of empiricism, restoring the openness to the unknown.”

Source: http://decaying.digital

III

In touch with the common soil of language, the unknown imagination of those literate enough to enjoy the process of reading for extended periods of time blooms in the sight of a fellow speaker. This blossoming kinship, where both acknowledge one another as a current in a synergy, gives a holistic awareness that the currently developing video gamers in an exorbitantly simulated (assimilated, totalitarian, ruled) environment, find unable to reach.

The understanding without words is sourced by a knowing of oneself — literacy. Through endless meditations on equanimity, culturing the belonging to the immediate moment through the concrete, here unfolds an effort of refinement and creative self-correction. http://defendmind.com

Andrey Milyayev, 2017 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/