BRIGHTENING THE WORLD OF NON-READERS THROUGH PARENTAL PARTNERSHIP

2

Back in 1998, school was reclassified to become School IV and holds the distinction of being the biggest school in Quezon City in terms of school population. Presently, it has a total population of 9300 under the administration of a hardworking and output-oriented principal, Dr. Robert S. Macasieb. 5

BACKGROUND:

Based on the PHIL-IRI pre-test this school year 2015-2016, out of 1624 Grade Three pupils, 349 pupils were identified as non-readers.

400

349

350

2014-2015

300 250

2015-2016

232

200 150

117

100 50

Comparative2 Data of Non-readers 6 0 Grade Three Male Female

8 Total

Phil-IRI Pre-Test Result Word Recognition Grade Three S.Y. 2015-2016

1800 1600 No. of Learners

1400 1200 1000 800 600

400 200 0 Male Female Total

Non reader

Frustration

Instructional

Independent

Total

232 117 349

312 277 589

190 169 359

143 184 327

877 747 1624

11

PHIL-IRI WORD RECOGNITION LEVEL OF GRADE 3 per SECTION S.Y. 2015-2016

(349)

(589)

Based from the re-assessment conducted by the team last August 4, 2015 among the 349 non-readers, 40 pupils (11.5%) were identified as learners who have difficulty in recognizing letters. 400 Number of Learners

350

Grade 3 Reading Category

300 250 200 150 100

50 0 Letter Recognition

Syllable

Reading Level 40 273

CVC

36

Total

349

SECTION

NON-READER (LETTER RECOGNITION)

SYLLABLE READER

TOTAL

TANGUILE

16

23

39

FIR TREE

3

40

43

GOLDEN SHOWER

2

36

38

LAUAN

2

33

35

OAK TREE

17

5

22

TOTAL

40

137

177

14

AUGUST ACTIVITY

1st

2nd

3rd

SEPTEMBER 4th

5th

6th

7th

WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK

OCTOBER

NOVEMBER

DECEMBER

8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th 17th 18th 19th 20th WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK

1. Data

collection (PHIL-IRI Reading Level) Reading reassessment

4-7

2. VOC (Interview) Pupils and Parents 3. Walk the Process 4. Identify Priority Areas 5. Do RCA 6. Develop Solution 7. Finalize Improvement Plan 8. PILOT SOLUTION 9. Roll Out Solution 10. Check Progress of Solution

18

ENGLISH REMEDIAL TEACHING IN GRADE 3 ACTIVITY Week 1. Research reading materials, remedial reading lesson plan and activities through the internet. Search for free websites for reading program. 2. Selection of the appropriate reference materials, lesson plans and activities. 3. Encoding of

reading activities and Preparation of material. 4. Lesson execution 5. Evaluation

AUGUST

SEPTEMBER

OCTOBER

NOVEMBER

DECEMBER

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th 17th 18th 19th 20th WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK WEEK

Current State SIPOC S

I

P

O

C

• REMEDIAL TEACHERS

•

READING DOLCH BASIC SIGHT WORDS

Identifying non-readers

REMEDIAL READING

Pulling out pupils

•

READING LESSON

Remedial Reading EXECUTION

GRADE 3 PUPILS

Evaluation

REMEDIAL READING FLOW CHART (EXISTING) START

Can read ?

Selection of Non-readers

YES

NO

Pulling out pupils

END

EVALUATE

Executed Remedial Reading

22

Current State SIPOC SUPPLIERS

INPUTS

PROCESS

OUTPUTS

CUSTOMERS

Fuller and MASIO taught

English Teachers

Not consistently executed

Process Steps

PRELIMINARY ACTIVITIES

Based from Fuller and Remedial Teaching MASIO Techniques

Not interesting Less execution

DEVELOPMENTAL ACTIVITIES

Grade 3 Learners Poor English reading and comprehension skill

•Traditional style •Less execution

Post Reading Activity

• Application a. Practice reading

EVALUATION

• Individual Oral Reading

Lack of Reading materials at home 35/40 (88 %)

Lack of Training in Remedial reading 2/11 (18%)

Playful/ exposed in computer games 16/40 (40%)

Has difficulty in reading 2/40 (5%)

No follow-up from the parents 37/40 (93%)

Help in household chores 18/40 (45%)

No instructional materials in remedial reading 1/11 (9%)

Late reading implementation 2/11 (18%)

Always absent 11/40 (28%)

Working parents 12/40 (30%) No time 5/40 (13%)

Negative attitude towards Reading 3/40 (8%)

Maingay 13/40 (33%)

Walang ilaw sa bahay 1/40 (3%)

Madaming tao/ magulo 11/40 (28%)

Why RLS-NES has 40 Nonreaders in Grade 3?

Validation of RCA Number of Respondents

Percentage

PC/C

No follow-up from the parents

37/40

93 %

C

Lack of appropriate reading materials

35/40

88%

C

Help in household chores

18/40

45%

PC

Playful/ exposed in computer games

16/40

40 %

C

Maingay

13/40

33 %

PC

Working parents

12/40

30%

PC

Always absent

11/40

28 %

C

Madaming tao / magulo

11/40

28 %

PC

Late reading implementation

2/11

18 %

C

Lack of training in remedial reading

2/11

18%

C

No time

5/40

13.%

C

No instructional materials in remedial reading

1/11

9%

C

Negative attitude towards reading

3/40

8%

C

Has difficulty in reading

2/40

5%

C

Walang ilaw sa bahay

1/40

3%

PC

Root Cause Analysis/ Problem

PROBLEM STATEMENT

There are 40 Grade Three pupils (11.5%) of 349 non-readers identified as learners who have difficulty in letter recognition.

28

OBJECTIVE:

Improve the reading ability of

at least 16 or 40% of the 40 nonreaders into word reader.

Identified Priority Root Cause • NO FOLLOW-UP FROM PARENTS • LACK OF APPROPRIATE READING MATERIALS AT HOME

SOLUTION: •The team decided to create module suited to the target learners that can be used at home. •Exposed the learners on ICT/online reading strategy. •Engaged/utilized parents in teaching reading at home.

READING CATEGORY OF 40 PUPILS BEFORE AND AFTER PILOT IMPLEMENTATION AFTER

BEFORE 30 25

4

20 15

13 2 3

10

5

10 8

0 MALE FEMALE 33

Reading category of 40 Pupils Before and After roll-out implementation Before

After 30 25

2 2

20

8

15 10

1 3 15

5

4 4

0 MALE

FEMALE 34

PROGRESS CHART Name of Pupils 1

Alano, Borero

2

Alcotas, John Roland

3

Araojo, John Paul

4

Basco, Jasper

5

Bontigao, Wilfredo

6

Caspe, Aldrin

7

Cura, Axel

8

Delfina, Ferdie

9

Enriquez, Rommel

10

Fernandez, Renan

11

Garcilliano, Jasper

12

Gerarcas, Jashen

13

Gravamin, Russel

Pre-Test

LEGEND

NONREADER

Mid-Test

SYLLABLE READER

WORD READER

Post-Test

PHRASE READER

SENTENCE READER 35

Name of Pupils 14

Guillera, Jaspher

15

Lancian, Alfriel

16

Lareza, Rafael

17

Magbiro, John Carlo

18

Mahinay, John Allan

19

Malayang, Remy O.

20

Manlangit, Kenth Paul

21

Marquez, John Michael

22

Naval, Stephen U.

23

Obosa, Zenjie D

24

Resuelo, Jan Ronald

25

Rodriguez, Daniel

26

Sabandal, Joshua Paul

27

Verzosa, James Bryan

Pre-Test

LEGEND

NONREADER

Mid-Test

SYLLABLE READER

Post-Test

WORD PHRASE READER READER

SENTENCE READER 36

Name of Pupils 1

Antanoy, Jamaica

2

Arsenal, Lorie Jane

3

Baliguat, Kathleen Kate

4

Cruz, Mariah Joe

5

Dayag, Bernalyn M.

6

Dillion, Aurora

7

Estrada, Jasmien

8

Estrada, Jolina

9

Ezar, Jeanalyn

Pre-Test

Mid-Test

Post-Test

10 Jusayan, Kim 11 Magbitang, Myka Honey 12 Morados, Ma. Drexsie 13 Tugade, Ma. Lourdes

LEGEND

NONREADER

SYLLABLE READER

WORD READER

PHRASE READER

SENTENCE READER 37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

Albert R. Saguibo Coach

48

Access to free reading websites www.starfall.com

49

Access to free reading websites

50

PROPOSED REMEDIAL READING FLOW CHART START

Can read ?

Selection of Non-readers

YES Reading implementation at home

EVALUATE

END

Executed Remedial Reading

Pulling out pupils

NO

Informed parents for their role as reading partners

YES

Did parents agree?

NO 52

PREPARATION OF MATERIALS FLOW CHART (FUTURE) START

Preparation of Lesson Plan

Assignment & Reinforcement • Reading implementation in the home.

Research through the internet * Reading materials * Online reading activities

Execution of the Lesson

Selection of the appropriate reference materials, lesson plans and activities

Encoding of reading activities

53

NEW S

I •

• REMEDIAL

•

TEACHERS • PARENTS

• •

Identifying nonreaders

ICT/ ONLINE READING DOLCH BASIC SIGHT WORDS READING MODULE PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT

Reassessment of Reading ability

SIPOC P REMEDIAL READING

Informing parents for their role as reading partners

O

C

• READING LESSON

Pulling out pupils

GRADE 3 PUPILS

Remedial Reading at school Follow up at home

Evaluation

RECOMMENDATION This Project will not just die a natural death. After this, we’ll be having a roll-out in Grades 1,2,4,5,and 6. Rest assured that Continuous Improvement is here to stay in our school. RLS-NES CI team is hereby recommending this to other schools who may want to implement this project. Dr. Robert S. Macasieb Principal RLS-NES