IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION ______________________________________________________________________________ SHIRLEY COHEN AND HANNAH COHEN Plaintiffs, VS. No. 2:16-cv-2529 TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, MEMPHIS AND SHELBY COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY, AND MEMPHIS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT POLICE DEPARTMENT Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR RELIEF UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT AND THE REHABILITATIONS ACT OF 1973 AND FOR OTHER RELIEF ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION The Plaintiffs bring this cause of action pursuant to the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C 12101 et. Seq. and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 701 et. Seq. They also bring state-law causes of action for Tennessee common-law intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This Court has jurisdiction over the Federal Claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1331. 2. This Court also has jurisdiction over the Federal Claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1343(4). 3. This Court has jurisdiction over the Tennessee common-law causes of action pursuant to United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 (1966). 4. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391.

PARTIES 5. The Plaintiff, Hannah Cohen, is a natural person living in Chattanooga, Tennessee. 6. The Plaintiff, Shirley Cohen, is a natural person living in Chattanooga Tennessee and is the mother and legal best friend of Hannah Cohen. 7. The Defendant, Transportation Security Administration (TSA), is a United States governmental entity charged with security for airline passengers. It has servants and agents at the Memphis International Airport. 8. The Defendant, Memphis and Shelby County Airport Authority (MSCAA), is an independent governmental authority established by the County of Shelby, Tennessee and the City of Memphis, Tennessee, to operate the Memphis International Airport. 9. The Memphis International Airport Police Department (MIAPD) is the official police for the Memphis International Airport and is in charge of policing the airport campus. FACTUAL AVERMENTS 10. The Plaintiff, Hannah Cohen, is an individual who has a physical and mental impairment that substantially limit one or more of her life activities and has a record of such impairment. She had this physical and mental impairment on June 30, 2015 and before. 11. More particularly, the Plaintiff, Hannah Cohen, has damage from radiation and removal of a brain tumor that substantially limits her ability to speak, walk, stand, see, hear, care for herself, learn and work, think, concentrate, and interact with others. 12. This substantial limitation on her life activity by the radiation and removal of the brain tumor causes her to be significantly limited in the ability the life activities listed above compared to the manner, duration, and conditions under which individuals are able to perform these activities. This substantial limitation is obvious upon sight and was obvious on June 30, 2015. 13. On June 30, 2015, the Plaintiff, Hannah Cohen, and the Plaintiff, Shirley Cohen, were on the campus of the Memphis International Airport, Memphis, Tennessee, after receiving treatment at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital and planning to embark on an airplane home

to Chattanooga, Tennessee. Both Plaintiffs were required to proceed through a security checkpoint manned by servants and agents of the Defendant, Memphis International Airport Police Department and the Defendant, Transportation Security Administration, to be screened for contraband and weapons before being allowed to board their flight. 14. As the Plaintiff, Hannah Cohen, went through this screening process at the airport campus, a warning alarm went off. This warning alarm was to warn the Airport Police and Transportation Security Administration personnel manning the security checkpoint there was either some kind of contraband on the party being screened or a weapon on the party being screened. The Plaintiff, Hannah Cohen, however carried no contraband or weapon when she went through the screening at the Memphis International Airport campus on June 30, 2015. 15. However, the Plaintiff, Hannah Cohen, became disorientated and confused by the warning alarm and the actions of the personnel manning the security checkpoint to try to search her person because of her disability. The security personnel failed to recognize that she was confused because of her obvious disability and was unable to cooperate with the search. 16. The Plaintiff, Shirley Cohen, repeatedly tried to tell the personnel manning the security checkpoint of her daughter’s brain tumor and disabilities. However, the personnel at the security checkpoint refused to listen to the Plaintiff, Shirley Cohen, concerning her daughter’s disability. They proceeded to assault the Plaintiff, Hannah Cohen, at the checkpoint, causing her physical and emotional injury as well as emotional injury to Plaintiff, Shirley Cohen as she witnessed the assault on her daughter. 17. The Plaintiff, Shirley Cohen, witnessed this assault on her daughter by the personnel at the security checkpoint. This caused her extreme emotional injury as she watched the personnel assault her daughter. 18. The security personnel at the checkpoint arrested the Plaintiff, Hannah Cohen, and she was transferred to the Memphis Police Department. She was arraigned for various charges and these charges were later dismissed in their entirety.

CAUSES OF ACTION 19. The defendants are liable to the Plaintiff, Hannah Cohen, for discriminatory acts on June 30, 2015, at the security checkpoint where officers, servants and agents of the Transportation Security Administration and the Memphis Airport Police, discriminated against the Plaintiff, Hannah Cohen, because of her disability in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act. These acts of discrimination were intentional. 20. More particularly, the Transportation Security Administration and Memphis Airport Police officers did not provide any reasonable accommodation for screening for the disability of the Plaintiff, Hannah Cohen, and did not screen her providing for her disability at the checkpoint. The Defendant, Memphis and Shelby County Airport Authority, is liable for failure to properly supervise the personnel at the security checkpoint and provide proper regulation of the campus of the Memphis International Airport as required by the Americans With Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act. 21. The Defendants, Transportation Security Administration and Memphis Airport Police are liable to the Plaintiff, Hannah Cohen, for intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress, because the acts of their servants and agents of assaulting her in an airport without cause and arresting her for no cause. These acts were either done intentionally or with reckless indifference or negligence, entitling the Plaintiff, Hannah Cohen, to damages. 22. The Defendants, Transportation Security Administration and Memphis Airport Police, are liable also the Plaintiff, Shirley Cohen, for intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress, because the acts performed to her daughter were performed in her presence, causing her severe emotional distress. 23. The Defendant, Memphis and Shelby County Airport Authority, is liable for the intentional infliction and negligent infliction of emotional distress by the personnel at the security checkpoint because of its failure to properly manage the campus of the Memphis International Airport and the personnel at the security checkpoint.

DAMAGES 24. The Plaintiffs have suffered medical expenses, personal injury, emotional injury, pain and suffering, and embarrassment from the actions of the Defendants, their servants and agents. 25. The Plaintiffs are entitled to punitive damages because the actions of the Defendants, their servants and agents, were done maliciously, intentionally, and with reckless disregard to the rights of the Plaintiffs. 26. The Plaintiffs are entitled to their reasonable attorney fees and costs. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Plaintiffs pray for damages in a reasonable sum not exceeding $100,000.00 (One Hundred Thousand Dollars) and costs. The Plaintiffs pray for all other relief they are entitled to under the law and the facts. Respectfully submitted, /s/William Hardwick William G. Hardwick II Attorney at Law 4745 Poplar Avenue, Suite 201 Memphis, Tennessee 38117 #13264 901-683-3292 [email protected] /s/Kelly Pearson Kelly Pearson Attorney at Law 4745 Poplar Avenue, Suite 212 Memphis, Tennessee 38117 #032300 901-338-2638 [email protected]

Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-07-03 12-1 Amended ...

... living in Chattanooga Tennessee and is. the mother and legal best friend of Hannah Cohen. 7. The Defendant, Transportation Security Administration (TSA), ...

57KB Sizes 1 Downloads 220 Views

Recommend Documents

Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-09-30 44 TSA Opposition ...
Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-09-30 44 TSA Opposition to Sai motion to intervene.pdf. Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-09-30 44 TSA ...

Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-08-10 22 MSCAA Motion ...
Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-08-10 22 MSCAA Motion for judgment on the pleadings.pdf. Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-08-10 22 ...

Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-08-10 23 MEM PD Motion ...
Page 1 of 2. 1. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. WESTERN DIVISION. SHIRLEY COHEN AND HANNAH COHEN,. Plaintiffs,. v. NO. 2:16-CV-2529. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,. MEMPHIS-SHELBY COUNTY AIRPORT AU

Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-08-10 23-1 Memorandum in ...
think, concentrate, and interact with others. ... Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-08-10 23-1 Me ... f MEM PD Motion for judgment on the pleadings.pdf.

Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-08-10 22-1 Memorandum in ...
Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-08-10 22-1 Me ... of MSCAA Motion for judgment on the pleadings.pdf. Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 ...

Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-07-29 21 MEM PD Answer.pdf
Page 3 of 18. Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-07-29 21 MEM PD Answer.pdf. Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-07-29 21 MEM PD Answer.pdf.

Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-11-10 50 Court Order re ...
Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-11-10 50 Court Order re MJP and MSJ.pdf. Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-11-10 50 Court Order re MJP ...

Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-07-29 20 MSCAA Answer.pdf
Page 1 of 17. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. WESTERN DIVISION. SHIRLEY COHEN AND HANNAH COHEN,. Plaintiffs,. v. NO. 2:16-CV-2529. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,. MEMPHIS-SHELBY COUNTY AIRPORT AUTH

Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-09-02 29 Court Order ...
Plaintiffs request an extension of time to file a response to each motion until twenty-one. days after an answer is filed by Defendant Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”). The. Court finds that the Motion is well-taken, and it is hereb

Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-09-15 34 Joint Motion to ...
AND MEMPHIS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT POLICE ... Logan A. Klauss (#34311) ... 34 Joint ... ay ADR requirements pending dispositive motions.pdf. Cohen v ...

Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-10-21 47 Sai Reply re ...
Oct 21, 2016 - Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-10-21 47 Sai R ... ne and unopposed motion for leave to file same.pdf. Cohen v TSA TNWD ...

Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-11-08 49 Court Order ...
P. 24(a)(2), a court must permit anyone to intervene who “claims an. interest relating . . . to the transaction that is the subject of the action, and is so situated that. disposing of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the movan

Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-10-31 48 MSCAA Notice ...
Page 1 of 3. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. WESTERN DIVISION. SHIRLEY COHEN AND ...

Cohen v. Facebook.pdf
A. Facebook's Social Media Platform. Facebook's eponymous social media website allows users to create personalized. webpages that contain information ...

Brooks v Delegas Amended Complaint.pdf
Raphael Brooks (“Named Plaintiff) brings this collective action pursuant to the Fair Labor. Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. (“FLSA”), Mass. General Laws ...

Sai v TSA SCOTUS 16-287 2016-12-02 TSA Opposition to cert.pdf ...
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Sai v TSA SCO ... n to cert.pdf. Sai v TSA SCOT ... on to cert.pdf.

(Amended)
Dec 30, 1994 - from IEEE Electron Device Letters, Feb. 12, 1991, vol. 12,. No. 2, pp. ... sile Seeker Simulation” by W.S.Chan, J.S.Shie, C.H.Wang,. V.K.Raman ...

MacLean v DHS - MSPB TSA omission of supervisory dialogue ...
... did he show his. 19 agreement? 20. 21. 22. A. Q. A. He said, II I agree with you, full heartedly. 11. Those were his words? No. 1 1 m -- he just was in agreement with me. Page 2 of 2. Main menu. Displaying MacLean v DHS - MSPB TSA omission of sup

Rauner v. AFSCME 120 First Amended Complaint 2015.06.01.pdf ...
AFSCME 120 First Amended Complaint 2015.06.01.pdf. Rauner v. AFSCME 120 First Amended Complaint 2015.06.01.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In.

Ayala v CyberPower First Amended Complaint.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. Ayala v ...

Rauner v. AFSCME 120 First Amended Complaint 2015.06.01.pdf ...
Central Management Services, ). in his official capacity, ). ) Defendants, ). ) ) LISA MADIGAN, Attorney General of ). the State of Illinois, ). ) Intervenor-Defendant.

Rauner v. AFSCME 120-1 Exhibits to First Amended Complaint ...
Service Commission to implement that Section; and the. Union is the historical representative pursuant to the. Illinois Public Labor Relations Act, for the ...

Ayala v CyberPower First Amended Complaint.pdf
Ford Lane, Bartlett, Illinois 60103. 2. ... with its principal place of business at 4241 12th Ave East, Suite 400, ... 1, 2009 reflecting an increase in his base pay from $220,000 to $234,000 per ... Ayala v CyberPower First Amended Complaint.pdf.

RAVEN BLCN Amended Amended Further Amended Statement of ...
Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.), ... RAVEN BLCN Amended Amended Further Amended Statement of Claim-0001.pdf.