IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION SHIRLEY COHEN AND HANNAH COHEN, Plaintiffs, v. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, MEMPHIS AND SHELBY COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY, and MEMPHIS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. 16-cv-2529-SHL-cgc
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Extend Time for Response to Defendants’ Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings. (ECF No. 25.) Defendants Memphis and Shelby County Airport Authority and Memphis International Airport Police Department each filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on August 10, 2016. (ECF Nos. 22–23.) The deadline for Plaintiffs to respond is September 7, 2016. Plaintiffs request an extension of time to file a response to each motion until twenty-one days after an answer is filed by Defendant Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”). The Court finds that the Motion is well-taken, and it is hereby GRANTED. Defendant TSA has until September 24, 2016, to file an Answer. The deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to each Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is now October 15, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of September, 2016. s/ Sheryl H. Lipman SHERYL H. LIPMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-09-02 29 Court Order ...
Plaintiffs request an extension of time to file a response to each motion until twenty-one. days after an answer is filed by Defendant Transportation Security Administration (âTSAâ). The. Court finds that the Motion is well-taken, and it is hereby GRANTED. Defendant TSA has until September 24, 2016, to file an Answer.
P. 24(a)(2), a court must permit anyone to intervene who âclaims an. interest relating . . . to the transaction that is the subject of the action, and is so situated that. disposing of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the movan
Page 1 of 17. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. WESTERN DIVISION. SHIRLEY COHEN AND HANNAH COHEN,. Plaintiffs,. v. NO. 2:16-CV-2529. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,. MEMPHIS-SHELBY COUNTY AIRPORT AUTH
Page 1 of 2. 1. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. WESTERN DIVISION. SHIRLEY COHEN AND HANNAH COHEN,. Plaintiffs,. v. NO. 2:16-CV-2529. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,. MEMPHIS-SHELBY COUNTY AIRPORT AU
think, concentrate, and interact with others. ... Cohen v TSA TNWD 2-16-cv-02529 2016-08-10 23-1 Me ... f MEM PD Motion for judgment on the pleadings.pdf.
... living in Chattanooga Tennessee and is. the mother and legal best friend of Hannah Cohen. 7. The Defendant, Transportation Security Administration (TSA), ...
AND MEMPHIS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT POLICE ... Logan A. Klauss (#34311) ... 34 Joint ... ay ADR requirements pending dispositive motions.pdf. Cohen v ...
A. Facebook's Social Media Platform. Facebook's eponymous social media website allows users to create personalized. webpages that contain information ...
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Sai v TSA SCO ... n to cert.pdf. Sai v TSA SCOT ... on to cert.pdf.
... did he show his. 19 agreement? 20. 21. 22. A. Q. A. He said, II I agree with you, full heartedly. 11. Those were his words? No. 1 1 m -- he just was in agreement with me. Page 2 of 2. Main menu. Displaying MacLean v DHS - MSPB TSA omission of sup
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. MSPB AJ third and final order denying TSA FULL BOAR ... vid Graceson deposition quash denial 2006-09-08.pdf.
