United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
____________
No. 16-5004
September Term, 2015 1:14-cv-00403-RDM Filed On: June 6, 2016
Sai, Appellant v. Transportation Security Administration, (TSA), Appellee BEFORE:
Kavanaugh and Wilkins, Circuit Judges; Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge ORDER
Upon consideration of the order to show cause filed January 19, 2016, and the appellant’s petition for an initial hearing en banc, which the court denied by order filed March 11, 2016; and the lack of any further response to the order to show cause, it is ORDERED that the order to show cause be discharged. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this appeal be dismissed. This court lacks jurisdiction to review on an interlocutory basis the district court’s denial of appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel. See Ficken v. Alvarez, 146 F.3d 978, 980-83 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (citing Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949)). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41. Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY:
E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 342 (1948) 16. a â Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Company, 727 F.3d 1214, 1226 (Fed. Cir. 2013). 10, 15.
Sai v TSA 1st Cir 15-2526 2016-07-22 Sai Appendix.pdf. Sai v TSA 1st Cir 15-2526 2016-07-22 Sai Appendix.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu.
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Sai v TSA SCO ... n to cert.pdf. Sai v TSA SCOT ... on to cert.pdf.
P. 24(a)(2), a court must permit anyone to intervene who âclaims an. interest relating . . . to the transaction that is the subject of the action, and is so situated that. disposing of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the movan
Plaintiffs request an extension of time to file a response to each motion until twenty-one. days after an answer is filed by Defendant Transportation Security Administration (âTSAâ). The. Court finds that the Motion is well-taken, and it is hereb
Sanford, NC 27330-8941. (510)394-4724 ... Defendant. Department of Homeland Security. (DHS). Defendant. United States (USA). Defendant. MA State Police.
Apr 16, 2016 - Sai v Neffenger CA1 15-2356 2016-04-16 5992534 Sai Th ... tion to compel provision of unpublished citations.pdf. Sai v Neffenger CA1 ...
Sai v Neffenger CA1 15-2356 2016-01-05 5966953 Sai Mo ... to toll Petitioner's response times pending same.pdf. Sai v Neffenger CA1 15-2356 2016-01-05 ...
Sai v Neffenger CA1 15-2356 2016-01-07 5967742 Sai Re ... tion to compel provision of unpublished citations.pdf. Sai v Neffenger CA1 15-2356 2016-01-07 ...
Sai v Neffenger CA1 15-2356 2016-06-02 6005214 Sai Re ... se to TSA's letter re evidence preservation order.pdf. Sai v Neffenger CA1 15-2356 2016-06-02 ...
... did he show his. 19 agreement? 20. 21. 22. A. Q. A. He said, II I agree with you, full heartedly. 11. Those were his words? No. 1 1 m -- he just was in agreement with me. Page 2 of 2. Main menu. Displaying MacLean v DHS - MSPB TSA omission of sup
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. MSPB AJ third and final order denying TSA FULL BOAR ... vid Graceson deposition quash denial 2006-09-08.pdf.
24. 25. 26. DISCUSSION hat after -- posted personal and copyright ... information regarding said blog and it was then later reposted even though this is against ...
obtaining any license or Digital Signature Certificate, as the case may be. Shall be punished with imprisoimient for a term, which may extend to two years, or with ...
international sanctions. At the time, bringing medicine to Iraq without Government permission was. unlawful. The Office of Foreign Assets Control (âOFACâ), an agency within the United. States Department of the Treasury, had promulgated a series o