Bond Planning Committee
Agenda • •
• •
•
Welcome & introductions • •
Bond Visioning Committee S H E RW O O D S C H O O L D I S T R I C T 8 8 J F E B R U A RY 1 6 , 2 0 1 6
Strategic Plan Origins September 2015 Visioning • Community members • Teachers • Classified staff • Administrators • Board Members
Two evenings • Developed a vision for Sherwood Schools • Sorted into six “Game Plans”
Game Plan Areas of Focus Increase Student Achievement Equity – Close the Achievement Gap Integration of Instructional Technology
Develop Early Learning Opportunities Prepare Students for College and Career Increase Instructional Time*
Focus Area #1: Increase Student Achievement • Funded curriculum adoptions • Additional professional development • System of K-12 assessment • Attract and retain top educators and staff
Sherwood Cycle and Cost Estimates Estimated Cost
Long Range Plan Funding Est. Balance
Year 2014-15 Beg Balance
Subject Elem. Math
$100,000
$150,000
$50,000
2015-16*
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
2015-16*
ELL/ELP Secondary Math
$300,000
$200,000
-$50,000
2016-17
ELA
$350,000
$200,000
-$200,000
2017-18
Science
$500,000
$200,000
-$500,000
2018-19
Health/PE
$150,000
$200,000
-$450,000
2019-20
Social Studies World Language Art
$500,000
$200,000
-$750,000
$150,000
$200,000
-$700,000
$2,100,000
$1,400,000
2020-21 *Delayed until 2016-17
Totals
• Add days to calendar • Add embedded (CLT) Professional time Development • Surveys result in 90% staff satisfaction
K-12 System of Assessment
• Common assessments strongly correlated with achievement • Facilitates collaboration in CLTs • Teachers able to access classroom data from previous levels • Software and system for interim monitoring of student progress
Attract, Retain, and Develop Top Staff District-level hiring best practices (complete) • All administrators trained Implement New Teacher Academy • August 2015 Mentoring for new teachers • 2015-16 school year Continue and develop incentives • • • •
Continue to fund skip step model Seek incentives for other employee groups Address starting salary of new employees with years of experience Hire more full-time staff as resources improve
Focus Area #2: Equity • By June 2016, develop a comprehensive Equity Plan to guide our work
Focus Area #3: Integration of Instructional Technology • By Fall 2017, modify and redefine teaching and learning via a 1:1 deviceto-student implementation
Focus Area #4: Early Learning • Align and coordinate wrap-around services for students and families entering the Sherwood School District, ensuring all students are ready for kindergarten
Focus Area #5: Prepare Students for College & Career • All students prepared for college or for a meaningful transition to the workforce with the ability to earn a living wage • Enable and support students to make purposeful decisions for postgraduation plans
College and Career Readiness
Activities to Reach Goal • Elective pathways aligned to careers • Internships • College credits in high school • 8-year career path plan in 5th grade • Evidence-based mentorship program
What feedback do you think we received from staff?
Too many initiatives Too little focus Slow down Only do what we can do well
Next Generation Learners
The New Learning Paradigm
The New Learning Paradigm
Swing (69+) 10.5%
Baby Boomers
Gen Z (<19)
25.9%
(50-68)
23.6% Millennials Gen X (38-49)
15.4%
(20-37)
24.5%
Who are these kids?
Who are these kids?
Who are these kids?
Who are these kids?
Who are these kids?
Who are these kids?
Who are these kids?
How are they different from their predecessors?
How are they different from their predecessors?
How are they different from their predecessors?
How are they different from their predecessors?
How are they different from their predecessors?
How are they different from their predecessors?
How are they different from their predecessors?
How are they different from their predecessors?
How are they different from their predecessors?
How are they different from their predecessors?
How are they different from their predecessors?
How are they different from their predecessors?
How are they different from their predecessors?
How are they different from their predecessors?
The New Learning Paradigm
The New Learning Paradigm
The New Learning Paradigm
Interpersonal Competencies
Intrapersonal Competencies
Global Citizenship
How to Learn
Leadership
Intrinsic Motivation
Collaboration
Grit
Communication
Growth Mindset
The New Learning Paradigm
The New Learning Paradigm
The New Learning Paradigm
20%
20%
30%
50%
75%
95%
READ
READ HEAR
READ HEAR SEE
READ HEAR SEE GROUP
READ HEAR SEE DO
READ HEAR SEE DO TEACH
The New Learning Paradigm
The New Learning Paradigm
The New Learning Paradigm
The New Learning Paradigm
The New Learning Paradigm
The new Learning Paradigm
Curriculum
The New Learning Paradigm
The New Learning Paradigm
The New Learning Paradigm
The New Learning Paradigm
The New Learning Paradigm
The New Learning Paradigm
The new Learning Paradigm
The New Learning Paradigm
The New Learning Paradigm
Visioning the Future
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Next Steps
•
•
Bond Planning Committee
